The founder of the weather channel has finally said what many believe. That the human impact of global warming while up for debate is being railroaded down our throats for other reasons. http://media.newsbusters.org/stories/weather-channel-founder-global-warming-greatest-scam-history.html?q=blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/11/07/weather-channel-founder-global-warming-greatest-scam-history
"It is the greatest scam in history. I am amazed, appalled and highly offended by it. Global Warming; It is a SCAM. Some dastardly scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long term scientific data to create in [sic] allusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental whacko type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the "research" to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims. Their friends in government steered huge research grants their way to keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to be a consensus.
Environmental extremists, notable politicians among them, then teamed up with movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists to create this wild "scientific" scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda. Now their ridiculous manipulated science has been accepted as fact and become a cornerstone issue for CNN, CBS, NBC, the Democratic Political Party, the Governor of California, school teachers and, in many cases, well informed but very gullible environmental conscientious citizens. Only one reporter at ABC has been allowed to counter the Global Warming frenzy with one 15 minutes documentary segment.
[...]
I have read dozens of scientific papers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct. There is no run away climate change. The impact of humans on climate is not catastrophic. Our planet is not in peril. I am incensed by the incredible media glamour, the politically correct silliness and rude dismissal of counter arguments by the high priest of Global Warming.
In time, a decade or two, the outrageous scam will be obvious."
rate
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 40
Just because its on the internet doesnt mean it is factual.
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977171353
This guy says the earth is flat I posted a link and he firmly believes it....so I found this info on the net so is the earth really flat?
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977171387
Lets be realistic. This is what drives the "renowned climatologists"
"wild "scientific" scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda."
This is what drives politicians like Gore., and his politics.
Fear is a great motivator, as half the country has bought into junk-science like E-85, which will become the next environmental catastrophe.
How many of you believe Ethanol is a solution because the agenda based media, and politicians have told you so? Now how many of you have actually done any research on this scam?
this article was posted but the moderator censors it. MPD ---> Step forward
all the other scientific research must be wrong
mad dog, read a couple more republican blogs then let us know how objective you are
this article was posted but the moderator censors it. MPD ---> Step forward
read the debunking of the mono-thinking
Now that is Mono-Thought. Use your heads America, well those of you that aren't letting Gore, Hillary and the like think for you.
Hey, what is happening to your hero Hugo Chavez Libs? Educated Venezuelans are rejecting him, while mindless idiots and fascists are suppressing them to the point of Murder. Looks like a model for America if any Democrat (accept maybe Richardson) wins.
mono-thinker to accept, but your point isn't made
but attacking democrats
and speaking of thinking in the monolithic variety
who have you decided Hugo Chavez is a hero to?
btw when you broaden your mind
and you happen to be talking about global warming
you don't don't bring up dictators...
and to suddenly throw Hilary into the discussion
is very very very mono-thinking
at least Al Gore relates to the topic
which --- by the way --- I am wondering about how close the Weather channel guy is to winning the nobel prize for his research into global warming --- he must have done some research right...you know, maybe in a republican think tank or something... (I know it really fries republicans in general that someone like Gore can be respected by science --- good news, Weather Channel guy has his research too)
well I am off to google scholar to see his insight ---
All who believe that global warming is a scam perpetrated by elites for mass consumption, in order to bring about a radical changes to society along the lines of an extremist agenda, despite there being apparent widespread "scientific" consensus....
you are a CONSPIRACY THEORIST, engaging in CONSPIRACY THEORY.
Read again the paragraph above, except substitute "global warming" with "9/11 and the 'war on terror'." Get my drift?
The facts are that those that disagree with Global Warming are censored. Those who disagree with Lord Gore are dismissed while no government funding is given to those that disagree with Global Warming. It is a social movement not a scientific one.
The only mono thinking going on is those that refuse to see the other side of a converstation. I write articles about what I feel is intresting. If you dont agree you are welcome to debate, but I do not surrender my beliefs because some dont like them
rules out all research
this article was posted but the moderator censors it. MPD ---> Step forward
you objective? prove IT
your problem with Gore:
this article was posted but the moderator censors it. MPD ---> Step forward
okay enough asking for you to open your mind
(About Modern Day Publius Letters: A look at modern politics in regards to the constitution. ... more)
I just ask that you admit to the lack of objectivity
Now I'm still waiting and debating global warming/climate change or whatever else you want to call it. The earths biosphere is so vast and complicated that I still have a hard time believing that these computer models have accounted for everything that could possibly happen to this planet and the climate. And I feel that we are rushing ahead and that there is a very real chance that we could ultimately cause more harm than good in our attempts to control everything. And there have been many many example of our arrogance in thinking that we could control our environment that has come back to bite us.
So that's why I listen to to people who question whether or not global warming is man made or not and if we could do anything about it. We need to approach this with caution lest we cause more harm than good.
Sorry I seem to be a fly in your ointment. I write the articles I want and they are not just right wing. I take on both sides but I dont write a whole lot negative about the bush administration because there is plenty of that and amazinly it is not all their fault. My objectivity has nothing to do with partisan politics. It is my opinion is based on my view of the consitution and my political opinions. You are welcome to deal or post all the articles you want attacking me.
My Group has to do with a project I started but have not worked on in a while that is a series of letters based on my what I think the biggest problems and changes that need to be addressed in our country. (See letter one: reform the tax code)
Look at what you read --- rightwing propaganda, and if you looked close, much of that would fall under the category of whako
look at what you publish --- only mono-thinking
open your eyes, your mind will follow
nice rethoric, but look at what you have published ---- all attacks
look at the world --- it is beautiful
your mind will follow
continue to attack and you will continue on your path of bitterness
You need a life. I read all kinds of news. I know more about the world out there then most people. I write about what I want to that is the end. I see both sides of an issue and choose the one that I think is right. I do not like Hillary because she refuses to come clean with the american people and actually answer a question. I feel her polocies are unconsitutional and not the role of government. I dislike Rudy for the same reasons. You want to discount it as right wing propaganda that is fine think that. I believe it is the true constitutional view. Read your constitution, where does it say we should have a large federal government that does everything and tells you what you should do. It does not, It was established to promote freedom and limit the power of the Federal Government. I love how my writing attrack such ire. Thanks for the attention.
Gore won the Nobel PEACE Prize, not a science award of any kind. Why?
Because although the Arctic Ice is melting, The Antarctic Ice is growing.
Temperatures for the past ten years are DOWN.
Since the industrial revolution began, overall temperatures are down 1 degree.
During the great depression, while American carbon emission was at it lowest point since industry began, Temperatures rose.
Ten years ago the same environmental alarmists where crying the dangers of the coming ICE AGE.
Oh yeah, what is better than Carbon Credits? Actually living an environmentally sane lifestyle.
Hypocrite, junk science alarmist, politically motivated fear monger. Mono thinker. Al Gore.
Also, when it comes to science, believe the scientist, not the politician. Hehehe
Instead you parrot Al Gore's fear mongering, and call anyone with a reasonable view of energy a member of the Flat Earth Society.
To find out, Koch radiocarbon-dated wood from the stumps to see how long they have been in cold storage. The result was a surprising 7000 years.
http://www.physorg.com/news112982907.html
For me that is not the point anyway. Gore and his worshipers want to scare Americans into a false sense that he can control of the environment. Seems few Libs understand how ridiculous that mindset is.
The responsible and reasonable mind should look at issues like pollution, and it's effect on health. We should be discussing energy independence to ensure the security of our economy, our independence from a religion that teaches its members to kill us. We should be talking about preserving our environment so that we can enjoy it, not fear it.
When I got up this morning there was snow on a tree stump in my back yard. Must be the next ice age.