Hillary just does not want us to see the REAL Hillary. ABC News is now reporting that another set of papers that were going to be released are going to be held back until 2009. Its time Hillary came clean with the American People. What is that this woman has to hide?
http://www.abcnews.go.com/print?id=3825609
rate
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 37
Hey, I'd like to see 'em, too. There can't be anything damning about the '92 campaign that anti-Clintonistas haven't already put out there. But, a "cover-up"? Nah.
Second, The Presidential Staff cant testify before Congress because the President has claimed executive privilidge. That is something that the courts need to decide, but Congress does not want them to testify or they would have already taken it to court instead they are using it for polical points. Bill Clinton did the same thing with some of his e.p. claims. The court needs to decide whether it is covered under ep or not.
Every time the Righties try to vilify her, it backfires, they forget they have Bush and Cronies on their side of the aisle making a mockery of their search for improprieties.
He is too busy attacking Democrats to explain why his hero continues to violate his oath and break the law.
They think the "swiftboating" will work again in 2008 , but they are wrong..
The only way one of their terrible candidates could win in by theft , as boosh did twice .
The subject at hand is the release and disclosure of H Clintons papers. If she is as squeeky clean as she claims she would be more than happy to let the whole nation see anything they want. The fact that papers are being held back and not released tell us all She Has Some things To Hide. A Presidentian candidate does not have the right to hide any of his/her background. What the candidate has Done tells us what they will Do to a very large extent.
Oh well never mind.
***
Some of you shooting off don't even take the time to read the article that forms the basis for MDP's article. It deals with private interviews about the '92 campaign, that were turned over to a university. Charles, nothing to do with "experience".
No the constitution does not address Executive Privilege, but nor does it address classified documents either. Somethings are contained in law
"Who she really is". OK, so it is just about trying to dig up a statement about what a bitch she was in a meeting, etc. That's what I thought.
Yes the Bush admin. has pushed the boundries just like the Clinton admin. did. That is why courts have to get involved.
No surprise, that nuclear secrets went missing in New Mexico shortly after Bill's election, and turned up in Chinese "designed" weapons a few years later.
The rotten fruit isn't falling far from the tree in the Clinton "Family".
At least Bill wasn't pushing their Communist agenda as hard as Hillary is.
As Chavez stumbles, hopefully she will to.