My sainted mother saddled me with a name that many people find lovely, but after years of having it mispronounced, misspelled, and misunderstood, I changed it. For most of my adult life, I have been known as Ann. Very few people know that this is my middle name, and fewer know what goes before it.
Ann is a good, solid, American name, simple to spell, and truly difficult to mispronounce. I like it. It is mine. It’s on my credit cards, my bills, my driver’s license, my checks.
One day, I decided to leave the country and applied for a passport. Enter that beacon of obtuseness, the U.S. Department of State. In order to get a little book that identifies me by photograph and proves my U.S. citizenship, I fill out a multiple-page application and submit certified copies of every legal document I have ever had issued in my name. Among these papers was an innocuous-looking yellow document issued by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: my birth certificate.
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania issues a certified birth certificate which is best described as taciturn. Along with the issuing authority, the information on the document includes first, middle, and surnames, city and county of birth, birth date and sex. That is all. No mother’s name, father’s name, time, astrological sign, or race. Nothing else, not even the fact that I was born alive.
Now a State Department employee might have looked at the certificate and thought “this must be a mistake,” and asked for another copy, since the only name on the certificate that matched any other on any of the paperwork was “Ann.” Else they might have figured that I had discarded the use of my first name, and issued my passport to match all the other documents I submitted. But no. I got Mother Superior herself at the State Department, whose duty it was to ensure that the name my mother gave me, that other first name, should hound me to the grave, and issued the passport in my given name.
It’s hard to describe the look on someone’s face when they address you by the name they are certain is yours, only to have you ignore them because you don’t realize they are talking to you. It’s something along the lines of, “Is anyone really so stupid that they don’t recognize their own name?” In point of fact, some people are, and I am one of them.
Customs and border patrol agents are particularly put off because obviously, someone who doesn’t know their name must be traveling with a falsified passport, ergo, must be a terrorist, therefore they should empty all their belongings and submit to a “random” (my ass) search.
When I didn’t leave the country for several years running, the problem faded from my consciousness. It faded, that is, until I lost my driver’s license. I could have used my social security card to prove my identity to the Texas Department of Public Safety, but because this is illegal (at least according to the card itself), I chose not to. Alas, thus began my journey to the dark side.
I grabbed my passport without thinking and went off to replace my license, not realizing that the clerk would question the fact that my names didn’t match exactly. She did. Then she changed my name, but not before some big, angry state trooper woman with a gun (and my passport in her hand) told me that I could agree, leave, or go away in handcuffs for disorderly conduct. Now, driving while not in possession of one’s license is illegal in Texas, which means that if I chose option B, I would be ticketed the minute I left the parking lot. So I agreed, which was the only choice.
Being madder than a wet hen, I decided that I would legally jettison this moniker my mother hung on me once and for all, before any more of these kinds of ripples cascaded through my life.
Off to the Internet I go, ready to change my name. The first thing I discover is that to legally change my name, which involves filing 2 pieces of paper and spending 5 minutes with a judge, costs $230 in addition to notary fees, certified copy fees, and a lawyer, if you employ one. The day comes when I have enough money to change my name, and I print out the forms. This is when I discover that along with proving who I’ve been for all of my life through certified copies of everything, I also have to be fingerprinted.
I have the option to go to the Department of Public Safety, but since I think of them as the Gestapo now, I decide to have the county sheriff do the work. Bad idea. On arriving at the courthouse, after passing through the metal detector and having my purse x-rayed, I ask for the sheriff’s office. Just go to the county jail, the deputy says. I should have known that I was in for a treat.
Jails are not pleasant places, nor should they be. Our county, however, went above and beyond the call of duty and employed Satan as their interior decorator.
A sheriff’s deputy let me know he was coming to get me through a bullet-proof window in the waiting area, which was dingy and badly lit. A few minutes later, I heard a loud metallic clanking sound, which turned out to be the jail doors unlocking. He opened the heavy, yellow, steel door that had no handle on the outside and motioned me in.
I couldn’t help but shudder when he closed that door. It would have taken a stick of dynamite to open it without the key. He led me deeper into the jail than I had ever hoped to go, past similar yellow doors with shutters over the windows, and bad smells emanating from behind them. We arrived in the booking area, where two female "subjects" were sitting in chairs answering occasional questions from one of several deputies behind the desk. There, Officer Bowser, for such his name was, proceeded to take my fingerprints.
Note carefully, I did not say he made them, he printed them, or any other verb you might think applied. He took them by placing my fingers on a scanner which photographed them. My fingerprints are now property of the United States Government. Wait a minute. Don’t you have to do something wrong to end up in this position? Isn't this how we treat criminals? Nope. In 2003, Congress passed a law that mandated that persons changing their names legally had to supply their fingerprints (biometric identification) to the government to keep on file.
Maybe it sounds like Chicken Little, but I don’t like it. Don’t we take the fingerprints of criminals to ensure that if they do bad things in the future, they get caught? Now we are taking the fingerprints of everyone, criminal or not. The State of Texas has required drivers to supply their social security cards and give both thumbprints for years. What is to stop someone from falsifying “evidence” using the information on file? At first blush, it sounds cloak-and-dagger, but is it really?
That old bastion of anti-patriotism, the American Civil Liberties Union reports that people don’t care for the idea, but that Big Brother is finding ways to launder policies by instigating them outside normal governmental channels. In this way, biometric databases can be touted as a good thing in foreign countries, and when we set up ours, we can say, “Look! The Czech Republic has had biometric IDs for years, and nobody is fussing.”
Yeah, I wanna be just like the Czech Republic, don’t you?


Comments: 67
:)
so my 'friend' tells me..
kobyasha maru..
If that freaks you out, check out what's going on in Britain.
Your story is quite entertaining though--I can especially relate to your use of "Ann". Whenever I order something in one of those places that ask for your name to put on the order, that's exactly the name I give them. :-)
We have several women clients who have decided mid stream to use their middle names in place of their first, what a pain and ton of paperwork it involves just to update our records, not counting what they probably have to go through legally outside of our business. Most of our male clients who go by their middle names leave all their legal documents in their given names...its so much easier. We even have some male clients who go by nicknames that have nothing to do with their first or middle names, but their business with us is in their legal given names. Men don't seem to have so many issues about their names...they live with what they were given it seems.
Didn't you also have to pay for an ad in the newspaper announcing your legal name change?
The point is that I am not a criminal, and I am not in any kind of security-sensitive position, and I still have to give my biometric data to the government. I wouldn't object to a background check, but to keep me on file puts me in a club that I don't want to join--criminals and people who are at risk of becoming criminals. And it keeps me there forever.
As for my name, I changed it more because DPS ticked me off than anything.
Some new U.S. passports have a radio frequency identification (RFID) chip in them. My daughters had to have theirs renewed this summer and one got the chip. These passports can be read by machine from a distance, without your consent, while they sit in your purse or pocket, although government publications swear that such a thing will never happen. Our first official act was to wrap the chip-embedded passport in aluminum foil.
They are also gearing up for the ability to machine-identify people from the chips. That means your face will be scanned and the machine decides whether you match your passport or not. Woe to those who have nose jobs.
A last note on passports: for a fee which brings the total for a passport to just over $100, you can have your application expedited. I'm not sure that it's really any faster, but it saves sweat and tears if your departure date is looming. I'd prefer to take care of business well ahead of time and save my dollars for travel.
Great article about a great inconvenience.
Don't wanna share that former name, eh?
I have had to be finger printed for several jobs, and once went to the sheriff dept but they did it in the front office.
Informative article and Igive you a ten because it is so well written.
Blessings
The only up side I see is if I ever turn up missing, then the police already have my prints on file...
It's Science Fiction come alive. The readable chips so they can track your whereabouts, the fingerprint file, the medical file with all surgeries listed including cosmetic. Enemies of the government (gee, I thought that was US) can and will be hunted. Is there any doubt there will be people living "off the grid" in the sewers of big cities?
1984 was just mistitled.
whew... please don't lose any more important documents....hehe
I've been fingerprinted - for teaching, being on grand jury, working for the federal govt.
I've been photographed... mostly when I travel by cab, and also when I went, last summer, to Ellis Island.
I have been searched at airports - repeatedly - only because my govt. ID was my work ID - I work for the NYC Dept of Ed.
Many of the rights in the Bill of Rights have been eroded since 9-11.
If we don't speak up, they will be gone to sea with the next hurricane's beach erosion.
For driver's license. The letter of the law says we must show it and they can make note of it in our file, but it does not demand that it be printed on the license. Even insurance companies are now required to issue us numbers that are not our - that is an option and I decline as does any smart person in these days of identity theft.
That's why they're taking your fingerprints, in case some illegal from mars or venus found your original name and decided to use it, at least the goverment could prove that you're the legal owner of that name & that you went for a name change but your fingerprints just the same. Thus they could deport the illegal (whos fingerprints are differents than yours) back to the planet where they came from. :^)
And I'll tell you my hideous first name if you post your...
As for Godzilla the cop at the DMV, be aware that it is perfectly legal in all 50 states to defend yourself against a false arrest using deadly force. I met him recently and won round one.
Background: I am approaching legally blind (glaucoma) and have a rather unsteady gait. I was walking across to the convenience store from my office the other day for my second Mountain Dew of the day, when a cop stopped me on the sidewalk.
Cop: Have you been drinking?
Me: No.
Cop: Then you're on drugs.
Me: Nope. Not that either.
Cop: Let me see some identification.
I hand him my passport. He looks at it quizzically.
Cop: I need your driver's license.
Me: A driver's license is certification that I am conversant in the vehicular laws of the state of Arizona and was physically capable of safely navigating a motor vehicle at the time it was issued. Do I look like I'm operating a motor vehicle?
Cop: State law says you have to show your license.
Me: Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Nevada before the Supreme Court of the United States says I only have to provide identification. That pasport is recognized around the world as legal identification, it better be accepted in Arizona, as well. Federal law trumps state law.
Cop: You're under arrest for resisting arrest.
Me: I'd seriously reconsider that because I am perfectly willing to blow up a balloon, have my cheeck swabbed, pee in a bottle, or give blood. I just won't turn over my driver's license.
Cop: Why not?
Me: Because the chances of you handing it back to me range somewhere between zero and none and I plan to drive home this evening.
Cop: Why wouldn't I give it back?
Me: Because I'm blind, you feces for gray matter. I have to drive 8 miles each way every day so that I can eat. I have never struck another vehicle and I intend to keep this certification until it expires in 2011.
Cop: You drove here today, that's enough for me to demand it.
Me: Did you witness me driving?
Cop: No (this was 4 hours after I got to work).
Me: Then you don't need to see my certification.
Cop: You're an accident waiting to happen!
Me: Constitutionally, until you witness me breaking or bending a law, you haven't got a leg to stand on.
He's getting red now.
Me: Sappington v. Garcia upholds the fact that I can use deadly force to defend myself against a bogus charge by a police officer. Again, I recommend you rethink what you're doing.
He walked back to his car at the gas pump.
I had to stay at the office 45 minutes longer than I should have because he parked up the street to catch me in my truck.
I'm so glad I am not the ONLY one in my family who knows how to talk to cops!!
Do I like handing out information to people randomly? Certainly not. I just don't think that it's something that should be a big deal if you aren't doing anything wrong.
Fingerprints are taken to have on record- yes, for help in indentifying a criminal, but also for identifying a dead body, as well. The reason you were asked for them likely stems from the fear that you are changing your identity to hide who you were or who you will become.
As for the name thing- your legal name on your birthcertificate is what is legally supposed to be entered onto any state or federal identification card- license, state id, passport, etc. This is regardless of whether you go by your first or middle name.
The people you dealt with who gave you a hard time were simply following the laws they needed to follow, and the rules they have in their jobs. It isn't their fault they were doing that- it's what they are taught to do. A simple, "Yes, that is my legal name, but I go by my middle name, could you please address me that way?" would have gone much further than arguing state laws about how your name should be listed on a license.
Legally speaking, your first name is your name. Middle names are great and all, but but they are not a legal means of identifiying who you are. The only 2 names that really matter are your first and last name in that sense.
About 1/3 of the population doesn't even have middle names. Middle names come from customs in different religions and countries. They've evolved in the past 100 years to become more mainstream, but they are not required, nor are they universially used or recognized.
Then there are those who have multiple middle names. In some countries, it's considered an honor to have 1 middle name for each of your dead relatives that go back in a straight line for 5 generations. You can imagine that this can result in some long names.
Some other places have customs that a new child born carry a name for every immediate family member, which would mean that each brother, sister, grandparent, and parent add 1 name to the child.
While many of the tactics for allowing name "fudging" on official documents were allowed for a long time, the government has become more stringent on keeping tabs on who is who. This means that the problems you encountered are more typical now than 10 years ago. Technically speaking, it wasn't allowed then, either, but people were more willing to work around it as long as you were using at least 1 of the names given to you.
Well well now Ms. Weaver, it's abundantly clear to me and most of the others here that you obviously pose a serious threat to national security under interpretation of the mandates of the "patriot" Act and the "Military Commissions Act" No doubt your most immediate fate will involve you being whisked away to a place such a Gitmo with out access to legal council for an indefinite period of time or till this administration's Gestapo deems appropriate.
On the other hand as an true American patriot, you can stand with me and the millions of others who feel and are acutely aware of the systematic erosion of our Constitutional entitlements by the abusive and corrupt administration in office at the moment.
I use the term moment, because it is my hope that anytime in the very near future members of Congress will awaken and institute the Articles of Impeachment as soon as possible to set the stage for aggressive prosecutions of these criminals. Yes those criminals who:
.... have criminally brought irreparable harm to the families of those brave and dedicated in principal who've lost their lives warrantlessly as a consequent of self serving greed oozing from this administration
... who've reaked havoc on skewing the flow of billions of our tax dollars to their business associate defense contractors in an over sea free for all, from real and starving important budgets here at home that gravely need attention and funding
... that arrogantly and with no apparent remorse continue to lie and cover up the truth from the American people and damage the very living breathing fabric of our society and
... have mutilated our civil rights, privacy, and Habeas Corpus entitlements with warrantless wire taps, evesdropping completely circumventing the well proven system of checks and balances of judicial oversight; compelling communications providers to release private records without subpoena or a competent courts consent
... seek to cripple the fortitude of we who seek that path back to the mindset and ethics of our founding fathers, you know, those old visionaries who are no longer here to defend freedom so we as the citizenry must stand united on their and our own behalf.
Have a gander at my most recent article and remember I sincerely welcome your comments.
... and Ms. Weaver, remember where your liberty and justice still resides; within the ailing but still breathing Bill of Rights.
Before it's too late and we are unable to do so or even speak out of it, spread the word and keep up the watch on behalf of the beloved sanctions of our Constitution of OUR United States.
Alexander
Please consider reading my most recent article if you think you've nothing to worry about if your on the correct side of the law. A slippery slope it is my dear.
Alexander
Texas requires three full names on its drivers' licenses. Ann Weaver Hart equals three names. I have four. I get to pick which three the State gets.
My social security card even has Ann on it! I never changed my name before because I did not want to offend my sainted mother. She doesn't mind now that she's a saint, so I went ahead.
We are in the process of helping a friend who lost a folder holding her passport, birth certificate and citizenship papers.
She is at the end of her patience with a bureaucratic mess that requires a birth certificate and proof of citizenship for the issuance of a passport replacement.
Try telling a bureaucrat that both documents were lost along with the passport. You will be told to get replacements for those documents.
So... You go to the next office in the next county and will be told that those documents can not be replaced without proper ID's...
You guessed it, the other bureaucrats want a passport to prove rightful ownership to the birth certificate and citizenship papers.
And round and round you'll go..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjALf12PAWc
Her research was inspired by conversations with an acquaintance, apparently, who survived the Jewish Holocaust in Germany.
Apparently the point of CHANGING you name seems to be lost to several of the previous posters. If you had wanted to give your ORIGINAL name, you WOULD have.
Since you use the name -- as above -- it's clear as a bell, that THAT is what you WISH to be called: Ann. And what it was before, no longer matters NOR is anyone's business. Glad you stood your ground.
Curiousity aside, you ARE Ann.
My birth certificate was legally amended by the court's when I was FOUR years old, when my Dad shortened all our names -- last name, that is. That shortened name has NEVER caused anyone any problems identifying me. In the original, the old name appeared with a line through it, with the new name hand-written in at an angle. My current COPY issued about 5 - 7 years ago is computer produced with NO mention made of my original last name at birth. (State of Illinois, where I no longer reside.)
Interestingly, my Mom had FOUR last names during her life, while married only the one REAL time. Her family shortened THEIR original last name, then she married my Dad with the old, long last name, then THAT was shortened.
Great points in your article, Ann. THANKS
Ron
most leo do not know the law but instead operate based on internal, political and cultural biases when deciding what people should do. If you look at history, leo enforces the will of companies (strike breaking), politics (removal of protesters, spying on dissent groups) and local racism. I'm willing to bet that if they do enforce the law it is more by accident than intent.
the aclu website has good info on deal with leo intransigence when to and when not to cooperate.
Why is it of any consequence that Naomi Wolf is a Jewish American author? Or that academics and other "non Muslim Americans" are on the watch lists? Is it okay for all Muslim Americans to be on the watch lists simply because of their religion? You mention Wolf's human rights being violated (the right to travel freely restricted by being placed on the list) because it doesn't seem to make sense that she is listed on the watch list.
What sense does it make for all the 7.5 million Muslim Americans to be watched? Because somehow they are a greater security risk than everyone else? Come on. Profiling is wrong, anti-American and Alexander W is right, it's a slippery slope. Everyone seems okay with OTHER people being watched or profiled, or those people's rights getting taken away, and only seems to care when it directly affects them. That, my friend, is wrong, anti-American and makes me think of two quotes:
"Those who sacrifice liberty for security deserve neither" Ben Franklin
and
"They came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up, because I wasn't a Communist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Catholics, but I didn't speak up because I was Protestant.
Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up for me. "
Pastor Norman Niemoller
P.S. Everyone should definitely watch the YouTube clip of Naomi Klein's speech about her new book on the historical blueprint that marks the march towards fascism; its chilling and fascinating.
Thanks for posting this article Ann! You definitely sparked conversation ;)
In a country where part of the promise of the American Dream is that we can reinvent ourselves the idea that changing ones name for reasons as simple as making it pronouncable never mind having a more "American" moniker can get you treated like a criminal is truly terrifying.
I wonder how this affects common-law states like New York where you are allowed to use any name you want as long as you are not committing fraud by doing so.
Unfortunately, since judges and legislators in New Jersey, California, Delaware, New Hampshire and Rhode Island don't seem to read US appeals court decisions, citizens in those states (who have illegal statutes or invalid state court decisions disallowing resistance to false arrest) will have to remain vigilant and aware of their rights.
On a further note, I was not aware that it was required to provide hard-copy identification anywhere: just to give your name and address. I'm not sure that Nevada law is legal, either.
No thanks to you, Alexander, for providing a droning, politically biased rant that adds nothing to this discussion.
Outstanding point about the false arrest issues, some statutory law is oblivious to major Federal court decisions and thus intrusive on many civil rights issues. I am all to familiar with this as I am a New Jersey resident. Here there is a six points of hard copy identification requirement. These are point values assigned and not referring to six separate elements. It usually works out to at least three or four hard documents.
I'm surprised you didn't understand the connection in what I would more correctly characterize as a Constitutionally biased rant.
But then if you align yourself with this president and administration you might not be interested in preserving the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. Re-read them sometime and the seek to acquire their "patriot Act", its tentacle like amendments and the laws and principals it modifies or nullifies.
Then perhaps you might feel more at ease, as you could then certainly speak more authoritatively about bully police and the deeper reasons as to why their conduct is more and more approaching that of an oppressive regime.
You know much like the dictatorship like governments we send our brave troops to defend against, who make horrific sacrifice, in order to preserve the American liberties and equity we all cherish so deeply, which are slipping away so rapidly.
Or in ever increasing numbers lately the defense contractors with diminishing quality and rising outrageous cost, hosing out so much of our blood soaked tax dollars over seas, allegedly doing the same thing while fattening their wallets and the wallets of those who allow them to continue the rape in spite of the protests of so many many Americans. Those enablers would be this current administration.
You see Steven, it's so clear that with outrages as such abounding right before our eyes, it's little wonder that the engorged cops, or over inflated clerks feel so empowered as to abuse good citizens such as Ann. This is not to say that all police and clerks are bad, only the ones who find it more fitting to over step and bully unnecessarily, a pattern also apparently established in the current presidency.
I don't know what you mean by politically biased, as I did not raise any partisan issues; only those related to the limitations of or ever eroding liberties here on US soil where the abuses of power run from Godizilla the Cop on up to the White House and seemingly everywhere in between.
You must have been mistaken because you intuitively understood that this president is the bad guy here and assumed I was making a left vs right argument. I've no desire to do so as my interest concerns Ann's civil rights, mine and yours too and the endangerment to the Constitutional aspects germane to such.
As far as the person that I've seen you refer to as OUR president in other comments; firstly, I didn't vote for him so I would more accurately refer to him as YOUR president. Secondly there appears to be some very substantial evidence that he and his crew are ripe for impeachment and criminal prosecution and I know you can't be blind to this as it seems that you are quite well read.
So Stephen, ignoring what this is really all about and focusing on only the microcosm of bully police and DMV clerks is short sighted. Think about the changes since 911 that have only further empowered these bullies while stripping our civil rights more and more each year.
It is exactly that focal mentality which may only serve to continue to allow this already icy slope to pitch further until we are very much as the Czech Republic or worse.
None of us want that, so the only means for us not to end up there is to stand UNITED against those that threaten this Constitution which I know, like me, you are also a big fan and supporter of. Very clearly Mr. Bush and his business associates are not. I'm sure the bully cops and over zealous clerks would disagree.
Standing UNITED; perhaps that is what the founding fathers had in mind when they came up with the moniker, the UNITED States of America.
I hope you've enjoyed reading this long droning rant as much as I've enjoyed composing it.
By the way, what's with the A-10 photograph laden so heavily? Just curious, have you ever seen, or moreover felt, an A-10 deploy any of those warm flashing buggers?
Alexander
My middle name is Helwig, my great great grandfather's name. I think it's a pretty classy middle name. But I sympathise with your plight. The best solution to the bad name problem is to reduce it to an initial, as one of the commentators said. You know, like " E. Gordon Liddy ".
I, also, noticed that you didn't mention your original first name. It is your right to not do so.
In 1969, I got drunk at Sholz Gardens in Austin. Upon arriving home, I decided I needed to take a walk around the block to sober up before going to sleep. Regrettably, I fell asleep on someone's front yard, was arrested, FINGERPRINTED, and put in jail. My concunyo came down and bailed me out. I'm glad my fingerprints are on file SOMEWHERE.
Jerome H. Zoeller, Jr. 10/23/07