U.S. homeowners be warned: Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson says the housing slump is "not ending as quickly" as presumed and looks like "it will continue to adversely impact our economy, our capital markets and many homeowners for some time yet."
Sure, you'll be able to buy your next home for less. However, if housing prices continue to drop by up to 7 percent per month then your equity will drop as well.
That's not good news for those planning to finance their retirement years with the sale or equity from their current home. It's also not good news for those considering refinancing to help pay their other consumer debts.
Plus, many homeowners have already borrowed against that equity - to send their children to college or get through tight spots. As homes are devalued, homeowners who have home loan amounts near their home's value could face lenders calling for additional collatoral or immediate payment of the whole home loan. Would you be impacted?
| Jennifer D. Meacham, Gather Money Correspondent | ||||
Jennifer's column, "The Bottom Line," is published every week to the Gather Essentials: Money channel. Jennifer covers money matters for RedwoodAge.com and self-directed retirement account investing for RISMedia. She's co-author of the best-selling retirement investing guide "IRA Wealth: Revolutionary IRA Strategies for Real Estate Investment" (Square One Publishers, New York). Keep up on the latest news and analysis into how you can take control of your business and personal financial future by joining Jennifer's "Self-Directed Investing 101" network. | ||||



Comments: 23
The whole domino effect of the this mortgage/homebuyer travesty is reminiscent of the saving and loan debacle in the latter part of the 1980's. That similar situation ,resulting in home buyers losing their homes, was also based upon trumped up financial hyperbole and pie-in -the -sky availabilty of mortgage loan money beyond what the applying consumer could realistically afford.
The difference between then and now is that this global economy is being negatively impacted (as evidenced by all those European banks screaming that got stuck with those loans once the loan-originating companies sold them overseas )versus just the domestic economy taking it on the chin . But the effects will be long reaching and long lasting as it was 20 years ago. In the '80's the resultant end effect was the closure and bankruptcy of thousands of domestic saving and loans that could not collect on defaulted mortgages(even though homes were turned over to the S&L they still lost profit )and the loss of jobs associated with those institutions in addition to people losing their homes, savings and dreams. Additionally the nation suffered an economic recession lasting several years .
Frankly, I believe this was great money making scheme ,re-created by those that ended up benefiting the most, recycled into a much bigger package . You know: "Those who do not heed the lessons of History are doomed to repeat them"( or something like that) and the more fittingly" A sucker is born every minute".
And we'll probably witness a similar incarnation of this ruse in another generation.....
Thank you!
Many factors have contributed over the past decade to create an artificially high real estate market - questionable lending practices, overly aggressive realtors, the proliferation of guru get-rich-qwik books, infomercials, and cable flip-this shows - and it is now time to pay the piper.
The equity position of many homeowners is what they call in automobile sales - UP-SIDE-DOWN - they owe more than the home is worth ... and it's quite likely it may continue to depreciate. Add to it, that many loans are experiencing rising interest rates because the buyer opted for an ARM (Ascending Rate Mortgage) instead of a tradtional fixed rate mortgage.
For those that missed it, I covered one aspect of the real estate slump last week in the article You've Been Evicted! about unforeseen consequences for renters as the housing and lending markets crash around them.
ALSO:
People should not have borrowed against the inflated equity so they could have those vacations or pay for inflated college courses. weddings etc. My friend did this and now is finding out her house isn't truly worth what she owes on it.
Nor should they believe it can be a cash cow for retirement years. It should be your property that you live on and when you sell it -get what you paid or a little more...not 4 times the amount.
This is just my opinion.....
FYI: I do agree with you that the stabilization or decline in home prices -- which were rising in my area as much as 10 percent per year -- is an expected "market correction." I referred to it here as a slump, since even if you're standing up quickly once you're at the top the fastest way down is to slump. That slump may indeed be our normal posture, but it's nonetheless a slump. That's my rationale at least.
Meanwhile, thank you all for your insightful and personal comments. I think this discussion adds a lot to the housing issues in the news.
This is the scariest quote I have read in days. I wonder if many people have thought about this. I know I hadn't. Thank for the info.
I always thought of a house as an asset ----- but NEVER as the bedrock of a retirement plan. I've seen too much temporary fluctuation in the housing markets over the years. When we bought our current home, over 20 years ago, the sellers were DESPERATE to sell. Guess 20 years seems like a long time to some people but I still remember those days.
Sure, there are people like an old lady in Chicago who had ONLY her home and then prices skyrocketed and she sold at the top of the market and was set for the rest of her life (mainly because she was pretty old when she sold) but that was luck - and timing. Her heirs got a windfall because she couldn't outspend her money, not even close.
On the other end of the spectrum.. I know a home investor and renovator who needs to sell after real estate taxes skyrocketed and can't find a buyer for a lovely home, not at the price she needs to get just to break close to even. She is trying to pay the mortgage by selling off antique furniture, piece by piece. Sad.
We have never borrowed more money than we had saved already. I guess we could have tapped our savings but they were in retirement funds and other vehicles we wanted to grow- and had a company match. So we'd take out a small home loan, pay it back quickly and eat the interest. But we knew that we had the funds to pay it back, in a pinch. I hated borrowing, both times.
I don't see owning a home as necessary for EVERYONE. I know it is touted as "the American Dream' but I was happy as a renter just as I am happy as a homeowner - but less so than last year ;)
Thank you for the article suggestion Jane. There are certainly many times when renting, or at least not full ownership, makes sense.
Thank you all again for your feedback!
That is not good news at all. I am very concerned about the economy but even more concerned because we were wanting to sell when we retired and build a new smaller home on our farm to live in. Not good news at all.
Thanks for telling us about it.
"As homes are devalued, homeowners who have home loan amounts near their home's value could face lenders calling for additional collatoral or immediate payment of the whole home loan."
This is the scariest quote I have read in days. I wonder if many people have thought about this. I know I hadn't. Thank for the info.
I'm getting concerned that the money we have put in to renovations may not have been well spent...I'm hoping we'll be able to sell and move in the next year???