Before my blood reaches its boiling point, let me make two things perfectly clear:
First, I have nothing against pink. In fact, my grandmother used to say it was my best color. To this day, I have plenty of pink in my wardrobe because Granna was never wrong about anything.
Second, I am incredibly grateful for all the breast cancer awareness-raising that happens during this month. So far, I’ve lost three terrific friends to this hideous disease. I also know dozens of other women, including myself, who are fighting the good fight. And we are winning.
Having said that, though, I walk into a local grocery store this week and see pink-ribboned Campbell tomato soup cans stacked to the ceiling. Suddenly I have this urge to grab a bowling ball and aim it at the entire display, knocking down every last can.
Not because I have anything against traditional red soup cans sporting pink ribbons. But I can’t help but wonder: who’s really winning here? This year's unlucky 179,000 who will be diagnosed with breast cancer? The 56,000 people, women and men, who will die from this cancer in 2007?
Or the Campbell Soup Company?
I go home and do some research. For every can sold during this promotion, Campbell is donating 3.5 cents. The maximum donation will be $250,000. Which is great, right? I mean, come on, Lorraine. Would you turn down a quarter of a million dollars for this cause?
I wouldn’t. But as one who has been on the inside of this disease and held onto the hand of my best friend during her final days of breast cancer, I would like to tell Campbell this:
“You’re going to make more than a million dollars on this October promotion. So yeah, thanks for donating one quarter of that bonus to this worthy cause. It just about covers the medical expenses for one woman with metastatic breast cancer. If that’s where the money is going.
“By the way, is that where the money is going? To directly serve breast cancer patients through medical care or research? All I could find on your website was that the money would go to ‘support initiatives in communities.’ Meaning, what? Cocktail parties? Coffee and doughnuts? Pink mops and nail kits? What?”
I could ask the same thing of any company that promotes a charitable cause. You should, too. Exactly how much is being donated and exactly how is that money being spent? Companies like Campbell know it’s savvy marketing to link up with a cause, especially one in which one out of eight women will be directly touched. They’ve got a captive audience.
Also, we Americans are awesome at pitching in when it’s for a good cause. In fact, nine out of ten of us choose products because of a company’s good will promotions. Company’s know this. What’s good for business is, well, good for business.
But let’s not pretend that these promotions are, in fact, making a significant difference. Seven years ago, I went on a 60 mile walk for breast cancer, sponsored by Avon. I felt like giving all my donors their money back when I learned afterward that only .18 on the dollar went to breast cancer. (Since then, the percentage from this walk has increased remarkably – as well it should have).
If a company genuinely wants to make a difference, then I suggest it gives more money, gives it year round, and earmarks it for medical care and research. Did you know that 5% fewer women are getting mammograms now than in the 1990’s? That's a frightening step backward.
If companies want to make a real difference, then for starters, they should use the money to educate people about the importance of mammograms. The one I considered skipping seven years ago bulls-eyed my cancer. Or how about funding affordable mammogram centers, especially in low income areas? Or setting up scholarships for high school graduates who want to pursue cancer research? Or for college graduates who want to go on to medical school?
The possibilities for businesses making real strides against breast cancer are exciting and endless.
Only problem is, they’re not as easy as building a cute, pink front end display.


Comments: 27
I kind of like the Yoplait campaign with the pink lids--it is strictly a Komen fundraiser, which I know some people have trouble with--but they are clear about that part.
Here is the truth, and the main problem: why bother?
Why bother if there's something in it for us?
Why bother when we can sit at home and watch other people live their lives on TV?
Cancer kills, and so does apathy. Cheers to you for posting this.
My grandmother died of breast cancer. My aunt is battling it now. And my mother is scheduled to have her 3rd lumpectomy in a couple of weeks.
I for one am grateful that at least someone is doing something. We certainly have become the nation of the offended. Its sad when even people who are trying to do a little are critized for not doing more. Eventually no one will want to help at all.
Why don't you slam the drug companies for charging so much for the medications or the doctors and hospitals for charging outrageous fees for their services?
These companies are going to be profitable anyway and donating a share of that, even with advertising that fact, is a nobel thing. If the benefits are not going directly to the patients, there is still the premise that much of this money goes to research! Should that be stopped.
I'm sorry, I understand that you are angry for the reasons you stated, but I believe your anger is misplaced.
Yes, companies that make big profits should/could donate more to medical research or directly to clinics to sponsor more women that cannot afford mammograms.....but at least, they are doing something and whether it is a good publicity stunt, at least they are donating....and more companies should take the hint and copy them.
I do agree that printing labels with a pink ribbon is a waste of money when a big sign above the display could accomplish the same thing....but for some reason the customer tends to see the label before they see the signs.....
your article is extremely well written and thought provoking.
My eldest sister so far has beat it...
The next youngest is Just into chem-o to fight it...
The next sister goes to the Dr preparing for when it is her turn to fight it...
3.5 cents per can sucks. I will instead give much more then 3.5 cents for every can of some other companies I buy...
you've got me going and angry... my sister whit it now has a fast moving version... there was nothing to be seen 6 months before then a huge lump according to statistics for the type and the stage she has a fighting chance of 82%... becouse she found it this early... another month and it may well have been below 50%...
I am scared, for my family, and for her children and grandchildren...
my sister is 48 at most...
I am not ready to loose her...
Thanks for listening...
So, yes I think pink is good. What we do need is what you suggested. A better breakdown of where all the funds raised is going to go. And that is for any charity. they should tell us. not let us know many years later that so little goes to this and the rest goes to Coat and tails parties to try and raise even more. Even that can have it points.
Okay, I am lost in my own thinking. But I still like pink! And i am a fall colors person :)
Yup, Campbell has a good racket going. What can you say? They are champions and contributors to a worthy cause, and also rake in an extra million or two in profits.
I suspect that Dan Tomkins' thought, that the $250,000 ceiling is placed on every product line stamped with the pink ribbon, is probably not the way of it. The "program" is probably defined as putting ribbons on many products, and the $250,000 ceiling is a collective that is probably met within the first few days of the promotion. The rest of the increased sales just equals a nice fat profit boost for the company.
Yes, $250,000 is better than nothing. Lowering the contribution to 2.5 cents per item with NO ceiling would be even better and still allow for significantly increased profits courtesy of the increased sales. In fact, sales might increase even further, since there then would be no doubt in the mind of the consumer that their purchase was helping the cause and not just fattening company coffers.
Good article. 10