The modern novel has been killed, according to critic Dale Peck, in his essay collection aptly entitled Hatchet jobs. The culprits: James Joyce, Thomas Pynchon, and Don DeLillo, along with their followers. The current crop of bad novelists, Peck says, includes David Foster Wallace, Jim Crace, and "the worse writer of his generation," Rick Moody.
Hatchet Jobs includes Peck's reviews of such notable recent works as Philip Roth's American Pastoral, Colson Whitehead's John Henry Days, and Terry McMillan's How Stella Got Her Groove Back. He hates them all. In fact, the only positive reviews in the book are of Kurt Vonnegut's Timequake and Rebecca Brown's Excerpts From a Family Medical Dictionary.
In a brief afterward, Peck explains his own philosphical approach. "Fiction is like dance: it's susceptible to the egos of its practitioners. Bad writers can't do it much damage because they'll simply be ignored, but a self-indulgent writer with a single compelling skill can do incalculable harm." It is because the writers whose work he pans have some talent, or what he sees as "an authentic gift," that he reviews them so harshly. "These novels aren't bad," he says. "They just aren't novels. They aren't art." On the other hand, he describes Stanley Crouch's Don't the Moon Look Lonesome as "a terrible novel, badly conceived, badly executed, and put forward in bad faith."
Whether one agrees with Dale Peck's assessments or not, this volume of negative reviews (punctuated by a pair of glowing reviews as evidence that the author does occasionally find something new worth reading) provides some insight into the mind of a critic and the standards he applies to the novels he reads.
[Hatchet Jobs, by Dale Peck, was published in 2004 by The New Press; isbn 1-56584-874-8]


Comments: 25
I did like Crying of Lot 49 though.
Interesting article, J.K.
I intend to read and enjoy and read some more. Maybe, as Jill suggested, Peck should read a few unknowns. Perhaps walk among the shelves at an unfamiliar bookstore and pull out a dozen novels at random rather than reviewing those specifically sent to him for critique or review. He'd be sure to discover some treasures.
Solid review, JK. Thanks.
What's that old saying? "Those who can, write; those who can't, criticize." Or something like that.
As a general rule I don't pay much attention to reviews. The man makes a good point though.. just because they can get away with it; should they?
By the way, they said God was dead also. I think they both will survive
This sounds fascinating. My take? I think the novel is evolving. You might want to read my latest review here about a novel called PostSecret, which began as an online community and then evolved into a book. Actually, it is still evolving. In any case, the premise of the book? Send in an anonymous secret on a postcard. You'd be amazed how fascinating the results were.
I'm too tired to provide a link. Click on my name and you'll see the article. :)
It's possible that the "serious" novel (as opposed to genre fiction) has wandered down some dead-end roads over the last century, and that's going to happen as long as creative writers are exploring all the possibilities. While we may treasure the novels of Woolf, Faulkner, Hemingway, or whichever author floats your individual boat, what kind of world would it be if every author thereafter stuck faithfully to the trail those authors blazed?
I think there's a lot of room for good work in the novel. The three act play has been around for a long time and people are still going to see them. Novels and plays deal with timeless themes. People always find human relationships fascinating.
There's no reason that new forms of writing shouldn't develop. Chances are that most of them will be terrible because most everything new in the arts is terrible. People keep trying to invent things because they're looking for that tiny percentage that's good.
Nippy, Fitzgerald was an example of the moderately healthy guy who can eat and drink excessively in his youth, can write like an angel even when hungover, can make a million and still be broke at the end of the year...and then drops dead of a heart attack before he turns fifty. Faulkner worked in Holywood, too. Didn't he write "Moby Dick"--or was that Ray Bradbury? I'll look it up and get back to you.
Yup, it was Ray Bradbury. Faulkner wrote "The Big Sleep."
I'm not sure how much was Faulkner and how much was the book but regardless it was a beautifully written movie.
Looks as if none of us believe that the novel is dead. And I guess we'll prove that when we're each published to great acclaim.
Great conversation starter, JK.