Hillary Clinton got angry with a person at one of her rallies for asking about her vote on Iran in the Senate. I believe this is one step in showing Hillary's true colors. The side she does not want us to see.
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/10/07/clintons_iran_vote_prompts_a_h.html


Comments: 27
Wrong party, Kate.
Expecting politicians or anyone else to be calm and positive all the time is silly. Sure, we want a higher standard from politicians than our kids but it's not very realistic to talk about seeing the side of a person we're not supposed to see because of an angry remark.
No Health insurance NO job - Hellery
5k Manditory college savings account for each kid - Hellery
Declare Iran's military a terrorist - Hellery
Want war? Want to be on the breadline? Want socialized medicine?
In any case, Hillary will make a great President. She continues to prove that over and over again on the campaign trail. Standing up to the questioner the way she did raises my level of respect for her.
But, since we DO see it, uh.... isn't that a bit of a monkey wrench in the theory ??
On the other hand, given the current political climate, it means he has to give a lot fewer speeches these days.
Shari F - by YOUR definition, what or who exactly is a "Neo-Con"??
She can't afford to be seen beating up on a supporter, even if he was a "left-wing" plant, which I doubt. People have read about her "nasty" side, and many find it believable. We all have the capability to be mean or rude, so it's not abnormal.
It's just her particular problem, and it's a big one. Ya can't teach charisma, and the art of political debate as charisma combat. She just lacks talent in that department, though she has some skill.
Like Ivan, I'm glad Billary voted the way she did, she continues to show some balls in standing up to the far left losers from move on and DailyKos.
I've said many times, and I'll say it again, we could do worse than Billary, or Obama, as president. Neither one, in my opinion, will tolerate "disrespect" from foreign leaders, and won't be pushed around or used as the "first woman," or "first black" president.
I think Billary understands quite clearly, the war in Iraq is necessary, and that it could become necessary to deal with Iran.
http://bestoftoday.gather.com/
Good question ! ! ! Most of the people that use that phrase, when I ask them what it means, they have no freakin' idea the term refers to JEWS ! ! ! !
Jews that SELF IDENTIFIED with the word, and chose it as their own.
Only through the tool and exploitation of the politics of personal destruction were the liberal "progressive" types able to so completely denigrate the Jews with their baiting and name calling, that the average uninformed person was able to graft their own meaning onto the word.
Pathetic really.
Christopher, now I understand your usage.