The US Air Force has launched an investigation after a B-52 bomber flew across the US last week mistakenly loaded with nuclear-armed missiles.
It follows reports in the Army Times that five missiles were unaccounted for during the three-hour flight from North Dakota to Louisiana.
The air force said the cruise missiles were safe at all times.
Army Times said the missiles were to be decommissioned but were mistakenly mounted on the bomber’s wings.
The W80-1 warhead has a yield of five to 150 kilotons, the paper said.
Johnathan thinks that if these planes had been on bombing practice a lot of people might have been killed. I think that’s probably an overreaction. For one thing, I believe (but I’m no expert so correct me if I’m wrong) nuclear weapons have to be activated before they can be blown up. If you just drop an unactivated nuke it’d just hit the ground.
Plus, I don’t believe they practice bombing by actually dropping bombs in North Dakota. I think the practice bombing ranges are all in other parts of the country. So this mistake was more of a proliferation threat than anything.
Regardless, an embarrassing mistake to be sure.
Original article


Comments: 19
As far as nuclear weapons are concerned, I agree with Einstein. It is worse than giving children matches to play with in a pool of gasoline.
Wonder what the results of that would be?
Two-headed cows and other mutant livestock.
Brian, if that were to happen in ND, based on past behavior, I'd suggest that Cheney would say, "Hey, see I told you Saddam had WMD. Let's go bomb the hell out of Pakistan, Syria, China, Russia, Iran... even Denmark, for crying out loud..." All those dominoes. Then we'll not even have those rocks to throw that Spartan described, since they'll all be radioactively hot.
either way, it's a very messed up situation...
could it be that the military is so badly stretched that such 'mistakes' are more likely to happen...?
very messed up...
Minnesota and Wisconsin would
probably get some of the fallout,
depending on what the weather
conditions were at the time.
I was raised in Minot, North Dakota. During the mid-to-late 50's we drank powdered milk. We could not drink milk from our cows. The "Mandan Milk Mystery" is still being studied. Animals were slaughtered and burned. Fields were plowed under or burned. Butter was a pound of oleo margarine made yellow with food coloring. Just about everything we ate came out of a can, not our gardens. My mother gave birth to a still-born child with spina bifida in 1957; as did an alarming number of other women in this sparsely populated state.
22 different types of cancer rose up from the poisoned Earth following those years. Child mortality, birth defects, thyroid cancer and leukemia were the early side effects. Muscular sclerosis and breast cancer waited until the late 80's to appear. The crap that fell out of North Dakota's clear blue skies poisoned the ground water. I have personally witnessed the burial of 8 of my closest high school girl friends. Several more have survived breast cancer, two are in wheel chairs with MS, and five have children that require constant care.
"If a nuke blew up in North Dakota,
Minnesota and Wisconsin would
probably get some of the fallout,
depending on what the weather
conditions were at the time."
Brian S, Sep 6, 2007, 7:57pm EDT
You'd better believe it would, Brian. Across the Great Plains - and especially across the state of North Dakota - the wind never stops.
Am I in fear of moving nuclear weapons across the country? No. The warheads that are currently in the news were not armed. I fear the idiots in Washington that would even CONSIDER building or using these devastating devices.
I read that the squad leader responsible for the loading has been relieved of duty, and several other technicians were de-certified on nuclear weapon handling. That's no little thing. That can drastically alter their career.
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474977110024