Pentagon can eliminate Iranian Military in three days

If we can defeat Iran so easily why are we having so much trouble with Iraq and Afghanistan?

Works for me.

How much "collateral damage"?

James- I think it is because we learned if we take out the military let the people work out their government without the military force they can supress them. Peacekeeping is not our army's strength

A very correct assessment I am sure. We have the best aircarft and military in the world. I am sure that an attack on Iran would do wonders for the price and supply of crude oil from the Middle East.

Elizabeth-

"Collateral Damage" should not be the overwelming concern. They have supported this rouge government if we can nuetralize their army we will be much better off and not as many Americans will have to risk their lives

Propaganda

remember when we: "Have to attack Iraq NOW before the summer heat comes".

"Collateral Damage" doesn't matter Publius - aren't you one of the ones screaming about terrorists hitting the WTC? Weren't those people "collaterel damage'.

You need to learn how to think, not just run off at the keyboard.

That was unprovocated act of terrorism there sharon. I have no problem thinking. Iran is supporting attacks on US troops that is unacceptable. I am thinking, sorry it gets in the way of waving the white flag

Modern,

Two considerations here. First, that we can do it does not make it right!

Second, if we can do it and not put boots on the ground, then we finished in Iraq four years ago! Why are we still there? If Iraq requires boots on the ground for an occupation of sorts, would not Iran require the same? Apparently we are going to stay in Iraq until Osama, the Saudi, signs the articles of surrender!

Modern, your way of thinking here gets in the way of waving the American flag!

What some seem to fail to realize here is that if Iran continues on the nuclear path that they are so clearly on, there is the real possibility that they will become aggressive against Israel, who if I read correctly, is prepared to also strike Iran in this event. Should that happen, we would back Israel, as they are our ally, and now we have lost the element of surprise.

We are certainly pushing all moderates out of the area with our provocative occupations. We may get our wish soon and HAVE to attack a few more Middle Eastern countries (making them even more anti-American extremists) - and where are we going to find the U.S. troops to take over all the Middle East?


And all for oil. How disgusting and immoral.

I would very much like to see a peaceful outcome to all of this, but I dont think it will happen. I think that little midget in Iran, is a bonefide nut case, who wants to challage the USA, because of its hatred for Israel as well as the USA. I dont think any sanctions will work against them. I think its all in the mix and already set in motion. These countries would love nothing better than to take down the US and Great Britian, they wont to run the world themselves, If we invade, we are the bad guys, but if we wait until they bomb Israel, it may be to late, because even though Israel is a tough little country, I fear that most of the Middle East will jump on Israel once the US, gets involved. I dont think it has a thing to do with BUsh. Iran has showed itself, years ago, when it took the American hostages, while Carter was in office. They have a total hatred of anyone who doesnt agree with them, or isnt of their faith.

Uh, yes politicalpaine, I would agree with vickey, and I think it's a safe bet the we DO
FAVOR the US and Israel. I did not see where vickey said in any way that she sees them as equal in making a decision. Personally, yes I DO Favor the US in every matter especially concerning foreign affairs. If the US makes a decision that is in agreement with Israel, guess it goes along without saying that I favor the decision of my country and government. I personally believe that to support a country other than your own is moral treason.

If my government is supporting Israel, and I support my country and her leaders decisions that is not moral treason. If representatives (citizens) of my country with her blessing advance the causes of that country, the same applies. However, if a citizen advances the causes of another country that is detrimental to their home country, that is a different story. If a citizen acts in accordance with the laws of the US, I don't see a problem with that.
Sorry pp, I'm not really in a mood to play semanitcs games with you.

Our soldiers are in Iraq with her BLESSING (our government's). You forgot to read that part.
When our government (and citizens of a young US) killed Indians, again it was with the blessing of the government. I did not say it was a moral decision, but with the laws of the time, it was indeed legal.
This is the last time I will respond to you on this thread PP, you keep jumping all over the place touching on many subjects.
To finish this dialogue, please understand that I support my government and her leaders whether I agree with the actions or inactions to be in compliance with my morals or not. "Render unto Caesar". There are laws now that are in direct contradiction to my moral beliefs, but they are the laws. As long as I am not forced to act in any way that contradicts my beliefs we're good. If ever faced with that dilema, I will deal with whatever the consequences may be. The fact is that ever being put into such a dilema will not happen as long as our great country continues to strive for our freedoms, both personal and countrywise. God Bless America.

"To finish this dialogue, please understand that I support my government and her leaders whether I agree with the actions or inactions to be in compliance with my morals or not."

Insanity.

Bruce

MDP interesting. The United States govenment is the biggest terrorists on the planet. We should all be proud.

The liberal/anti-war side is out in full force on this one, isn't it?

ModernDay - I have some problems with this idea of air power smashing the Iranian military. First, it gives the idea that all things will be fixed in 3 days. Now, I don't believe that Bush buys that - but the idea will be sold by the wrong people to set us up for failure.

Secondly, air power doesn't hold anything. You need "boots on the ground" for that. Whether they are Iranian revolutionairies (as in Afghanistan) or others, lasting results won't come solely from the air bombardment.

The fact that we are planning this (actually, I'm sure this has been planned for years - military contingency planners do this sort of thing all the time for many, many scenarios) and letting it be known in such a public forum is like taking a shot across the bow of the Iranian ship of state.