As a person who has lived most of my life in CA, I must say that I still get a chuckle every time that I see signs saying "substance is known to the state of California to cause cancer". I start thinking, hmm, I better fill up with gas in Arizona because I don't want cancer. I then start thinking, hmm, do other states just not know that this substance can cause cancer? I understand how different states have different laws about what MUST be shown as a warning label, but why include "the state of California" in the warning label? Why not simply put, "warning, substance is known to cause cancer"?
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16961, "Pacino"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 12
(saying "substance is known to the state of California to cause cancer")
The thought that ran through my head was, "So if we all know this why don't we chose a different material?"
I am commenting on all of your articles and photos as you have asked us to do in the mass email sent out! Not all my comments will be personalized as there are 20 pages of articles to read through and even more than that on photos and I would rather spend the time reading and looking and enjoying then writing! Btw I saw you were listed as having 20 pages of articles but it will only let me see 19 of them so I will Comment on everything it lets me see!
http://friendsofdanh.gather.com.
Our goal is to help you further your exposure and to support other gather members.