If You Read the NY Times, Please Read This: It Ain't Your Daddy's Liberal Media, Anymore.

keep saying that at any moment Bush will call for martial law. Maybe my eyes need to be re-cleaned, especially when the media has been hi-jacked. Maybe we already ARE under martial law and Bush just forgot to tell us. Why else THIS with the "Times".

Ron, interesting post. I still find it hard to believe that these NY Times reporters are spreading false propaganda. I read the link you supplied and it claimed they were Bush supporters in the run up to the Iraq war. However, I really do not think there are any Bush supporters left. When ultra conservative Anne Coulter calls Bush a "Nicompoop" you know you are in trouble.

good one as always Ron

Mickey b.,
After looking at your one post, and a whole bunch of your comments, I don't doubt you find it hard to believe that anything Bush supporters do is spreading false propaganda, considering you are yourself doing it. If there are no Bush supporters left, then you don't exist, as you go around the gather sphere supporting his ideals.

Liberal media???? WHAT "liberal media"??? That's the best little gimmick Corporate America's thought up since they sent all their money-making operations overseas...

It seems like most people here are already aware that the MSM AND the NYT are really just "Trojan Horses" for their corporate owners. The purpose they serve is that the real far-out 'right' that ONLY watches FOX are told that the MSM and the NYT are liberal rags, and any self-respecting conservative would never trust anything from those sources, they need only stay with FOX the 'fair and balanced' ...

Meanwhile the 'liberals', being also aware of what FOX says, make their comparison and figure that FOX is right (correct), the MSM and NYT can be trusted for liberal views ... NOT ! Maybe in comparison to FOX, but never otherwise. They are all masters of deception and disinformation well mixed in with a lot of Liberal views so the faithful will trust them and the right-wing will hate them and stay further right with FOX.

That is why people in the know write it; "liberal" media , rather than "liberal media", there is a huge difference in meaning.

So, they will keep on giving liberal slants to much to maintain that credibility rating, but on the things that make the most difference and which count the most to their conservative corporate owners, the story line will surely serve their purpose ... you can bet on it.

keep up the good fight to keep things on the table! :-)

All news reports go for the "angle". It was only a matter of time before that concept got exploited as well.
Thanks, Ron.

"don't doubt you find it hard to believe that anything Bush supporters do is spreading false propaganda, considering you are yourself doing it. If there are no Bush supporters left, then you don't exist, as you go around the gather sphere supporting his ideals"

Ron,

Wrong assumption. I am not a Bush supporter. I am a Joe Biden (D) supporter. He is the only candidate w/ a sound plan. I also am a supporter in Petraeus. This man is brilliant. The big question is the surge working. Both you and I can only go off what we read in the media since we do not have inside information. . I personally would take the credibility of the New York Times over a blog any day of the week. I really do not believe there are any Bush supporters left. So your conspiracy theory is in question.

Right, you've had the republican duh! moment, fine, and support everything, the war, the surge, everything but the man. The two dudes aren't what they said they are either, so that's what is known as propaganda, and the surge isn't going to do a bit of good anyway, the government is falling apart. As for no Bush supporters left, you haven't been on here long, have you? I can reel off double digits, right here on gather.

. "As for no Bush supporters left, you haven't been on here long, have you? I can reel off double digits, right here on gather"

Ron,

I would call Gather Bush supporters a vocal minority. When I 1st joined Gather It seemed everyone believed in the 911 conspiracy theory. They turned up in every Gather conversation. Upon reflection, it turned out they are a very vocal but small minority at Gather. They bottle or muzzle their radical opinion at work or in public for fear of ridicule and strike out with jihad full force on the anonymous internet. There zealous behavior magnifies their numbers. I suspect the same may be occurring here.