
Part 2 of 2; to begin at Part 1, click HERE)
But this occasion was unique because Salim had decided to lease the land to ICAHD and, instead of a home, build the Beit Arabiya Peace Center. Dedicated to the memory of two women who had been killed during home demolitions earlier in the year -- Rachel Corrie, an American run over by a bulldozer, and Nuha Sweidan, a pregnant Palestinian killed when a wall fell on her -- people from all walks of life had come to take part in its construction. One couple hailed from Sante Fe, New Mexico. "My husband and I are retired from the CIA," the woman said, "and when we heard about this project, we knew we wanted to be here." Another volunteer was a Muslim, a twenty-six-year-old Briton of Pakistani descent who had taken two weeks off work in London. Several other foreigners would be here later in the week, and all of us shared the conviction that travel, at its best, is not a self-indulgent foray into foreign lands; it is to help our global neighbors in the modest ways we can.
Elizabeth was the youngest member of the group. An 18-year-old Palestinian with flowing dark hair and braces, she had met Jeff the day a bulldozer came to demolish her neighbor's home in Beit Hanina, a Palestinian district of Jerusalem. "My family is originally from Ikrit, a Christian village near the Lebanese border," she said. "Do you know the story?"
I had read about this village before; it was one of more than 400 Palestinian communities that Israel leveled in the years following its independence in 1948. While the destruction of Ikrit occurred years before Elizabeth was born, it was part of her story, and this contributed to the beauty of what was happening now in Anata. As we worked, she conversed about the history of the region and its political dynamics with a maturity beyond her years.
The sun climbed higher and I joined two young Israeli men in moving garbage and heavy stones -- mostly rubble from the last demolition -- away from the building site. One of the men, 24-year-old Michael, had recently finished four years of active military duty. We talked about his years as an Israeli officer in Lebanon and the West Bank. We also talked about my impressions as an outsider who had friends on both sides of the political divide. When I mentioned that for three months I had lived in a village adjacent to the West Bank town of Jenin, he told me his unit had fought in Jenin and that some of his men were killed there. "I wasn't actually in Jenin," Michael said as he held open a bag so I could toss in some faded plastic Coke bottles. "A few days before the invasion we were in Nablus, and I was hit in the head by a rock. I was in the hospital while my men went to Jenin." He paused a moment and then said, "But maybe being hit by that rock was one of the best things to happen to me in the West Bank. I should have been with my men, but Jenin would have been a moral nightmare."
Michael was referring to the 2002 Israeli invasion of Jenin that left at least fifty-two Palestinians dead and many more injured.
As we heaved the last few stones downhill and wiped the sweat from our eyes, bad news came. In the last hour, Palestinian suicide bombers had struck two locations, one outside a Jewish settlement in the West Bank, the other within Israel itself. This vicious storm of violence had taken its latest turn, slamming against another set of lives and taking them away.
Not only were lives lost, but tomorrow's news headline had been made. Media consumers around the world would read their papers and watch CNN, and many would shake their heads at the hatred here. But this is precisely why the evening news is sometimes a culprit in conflict: it trawls the world for tragedy and then beams this half-story into our living rooms, leaving the other half abandoned among the olive trees. But when we are robbed of hearing good news-no matter how small that news may seem-our imagination withers, and we become too content to view the world from a distance. With sickly imaginations we fortify our walls, even though there are gaps where people are already coming together -- and where we could too, if we wanted.
The hour's bombings did not interrupt our work. As Michael handed up some tools to a Palestinian laboring on the roof, the Palestinian serenaded Michael with a Hebrew song he had learned in an Israeli jail. Another Israeli, who like Michael had also recently completed his army service, shared a bottle of water with a thirsty Palestinian who was shoveling gravel. And at midday, when a group of Canadian Christians arrived for a short visit and sang "Amazing Grace," all of us -- Jew, Muslim, and Christian-stopped our work and listened.
At 2:30 p.m. we set our work aside and, under a canopy held up by pieces of the demolished home, dug into lunch: chicken schnitzel, hot dogs, and veggie burgers. Our appetites were ravenous.
After eating, I lay down to rest by an olive tree, where rugs had been spread across a shaded portion of ground. With my head propped up, I watched several Palestinian boys sitting with Michael, playing. After a while one of the boys, Salim's son, pointed to the yarmulke worn by Michael, an observant Jew. Michael removed it from his head and gave it to the boy, who promptly put it atop his own head. Here was a Palestinian boy -- a boy whose home had been destroyed four time by a Jewish government, whose father had been beaten by Jewish soldiers -- wearing atop his head the religious head covering of a Jew. And here also was a Jewish man -- a man whose friends were killed in combat with Palestinians, who had served as an officer and would still be called up for reserve duty once a year -- sitting with his head uncovered before God because he was sharing his yarmulke with an inquisitive Palestinian child.
The Israelis and Palestinians meeting today did not have to travel far to reach Anata, but the words of Maya Angelou were as true for them as they were for the rest of us: "Perhaps travel cannot prevent bigotry, but by demonstrating that all peoples cry, laugh, eat, worry and die, it can introduce the idea that if we try and understand each other, we may even become friends."
Relaxed by hard work and good food, and with the heat reaching its afternoon peak, I grew sleepy. As I drifted from wakefulness, happy for the beautiful coat of dust and dirt that covered me, I dreamed I was in a land full of good news, where enemies ate veggie burgers and played together. Some would call this a hippie's vision, a fantastic dream that doesn't mesh with reality. But as for me, I only wished that the New York Times, the Jerusalem Post or anyone else with an audience-had been here in Anata, even if only to write one line: If you want to behold an incredible gathering of individuals, the West Bank may be just the place to be.


Comments: 22
I can't wait for the book to come out! Congrats.
dehumanizing of Israelis by making their attempts to survive
against daily terrorism from Palestinians seem like terrorism
while humanizing terrorists for having their houses torn down
- within the microcosm of your short visit, disguised with thin
attempt at balance.
It seems to me you want to slip a political commentary by under
cover of a happy travelog so you can a avoid responsiblity for
these propagandistic political statements - which are very strong.
I don't appreciate that, and it does deserve comment. I mentioned
several issues in your last article which you blew me off for as
well. If you are going to be a travel correspondent don't you have
some responsiblity to either refrain from political discussion or to
put it out there as your opinion and support it and not be afraid
to back up what you say?
I've backed up what I've written on Gather in various posts, and in addition I direct interested readers to websites and reports that cover these issues in depth. Furthermore, as I've already done with you, I encourage everyone to read Sandy Tolan's "The Lemon Tree: An Arab, A Jew, and the Heart of the Middle East." This book will provide some helpful background, and just as importantly it will show that there is broken humanity on BOTH sides, something you seem unwilling to acknowledge among the Palestinians, particularly innocents who have their houses destroyed by a discriminatory government policy. I do not dehumanize Israelis in my articles; I do criticize particular policies that I believe are clearly immoral.
The only accusing finger you point is at the news media which deserves the scorn. The media fuels the fires of hatred and intolerance by only printing stories that sell their papers or bring in their advertising dollars. They honestly believe only tragedy and turmoil attracts readers.
And, sadly, too often that is the truth. We only want to read "feel good stories" at Christmastime.
>> there is a big difference between someone having
>> political and humanitarian opinions that differ from
>> another's and being a "propogandist for terror."
That is a true statement, however it does not apply
to your article and I will explain how and why.
First, you admitted that you are expressing political
opinions here in your comment, so it is propaganda
in the broad sense. To characterize it, let's look closer.
>> there is broken humanity on BOTH sides, something
>> you seem unwilling to acknowledge among the
>> Palestinians,
Now that is not true. I know there are lots of
great Palestinian people, a macro-reality can always
be hidden by focusing on anecdotal images or
stories about people or event and then making
sweeping generalization that apply past that limited
subject, which is what I believe you are doing for
immoral reasons.
>> particularly innocents who have their
>> houses destroyed by a discriminatory
>> government policy.
Focusing on and demonizing Israeli government
policy that is attempting to and has mostly succeeded
at destroying people's houses instead of destroying
them personally is propaganda that does not
include the bigger picture. That government policy
would not be relevent if Israel had neighbors who
did not want them dead, would it?
Furthermore, your lack of acknowlegement of this,
indeed your persistence in "feel good stories" and
images on holiday when you have been there and
are pretending to be reporting accurately and objectively
on this matter is truly disgusting. This propaganda ploy
is an underhanded act of war, which I why I characterized
it as terrorism.
By framing the broad discussion as "both sides are wrong"
and then focusing only on a small location and the subject
of demolished houses and ignoring what you very well must
know are the larger issues you are blatantly propagandizing
for what is the enemy. Using the tools of war and dehumanizing
people while pretending to be the traveling innocent.
everybody, read this link or this book or watch this documentary. People
should be able to describe their arguments without evading discussion.
Here is one negative customer review from Amazon.Com of the book you
are recommending:
I would like to remind the readers, who are crying over
the fate of the poor victimized Palestinians, that every inch
of the State of Israel was bought from these so-called
victims, not only with blood, but with hard cash. Try to
remember the little blue box marked "Keren HaKayemet,"
where even school children donated part of their allowances
so more land could be purchased.
Try to remember that America returned Jewish refugee
boats to Nazi Germany, and England placed police on the
shores of Israel with the same intent. No one helped the
Jews who were being killed by the millions and had only
one place to go.
And try to remember that currently, most Palestinians
(those who do not indulge in suicide bombing) are gainfully
employed by the so-called Jewish oppressors.
It's all very well to be open minded and liberal. It's another
matter when an author twists the truth.
From:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/1596913436/ref=cm_rev_sort/104-3964229-8595165?customer-reviews.sort_by=%2BOverallRating&s=books&x=18&y=13
My point in citing this is to show that there is another side
to this that you are stubbornly and purposefully igoring
just as much as you are purposefully focusing only on
some Palestinians who lost their houses. Indeed you
are avoiding discussion of Palestinians who lost their
houses because the relatives were terrorists/suicide
bombers, you are not even being honest in that.
" If you want to behold an incredible gathering of individuals, the West Bank may be just the place to be. "
I will be watching for more.
During the years I spent in Israel I watched our society become so fearful from all of the nonprovoked terrorist attacks within the borders of Israel that something had to take place in order to preserve our tranquility and quality of life.
People nowadays seem to think that Yasser Arafat was a moderate. When I lived in Israel he was known as a terrorist. Of course we knew that there were men that were much more violent and to be feared.. Osama Bin Laden, to name one. During those years we were able to tolerate Yasser Arafat and his thugs because we at least knew what to expect from them. Nowadays there are terrorists amongst the Moslem population that will stop at nothing.... they completely and irrevocably want to inhilate the Jews and Israel.
I am not saying that tearing down people's homes is a good tactic to start peace talks. What I am saying is that before all of these stories of the atrocities happening today, there were other stories that caused the climate that now prevails.
Someday someone from all the sides will understand that we can no longer fight war with war. Rabin understood this and he tried so desparately to accomplish peace in his lifetime. I think that Yasser Arafat also understood in the end, as did Anwar Sadat. Even Menachem Begin understood that we had to find peace with our Arab neighbors. And hopefully there will be other brave men to come forth and carry on where these people left off.
Thanks so much for your comments, as well as the tone of your comments even when you disagree with me.
I've also witnessed more aspects to this conflict than what I've written here. I've eaten in the homes of Israeli settlers and in the home of a suicide bomber, have had Palestinian friends stripped nearly naked and used as human shields by Israeli soldiers, have had Israeli friends lose loved ones to a Palestinian suicide bomber, have had my life threatened by Palestinian kids with pipes, as well as by Israeli soldiers with guns. I know what it is to ride on bus #18 in Jerusalem on a Sunday when bus #18 was blown up on the two preceeding Sundays and so not many people are riding today. I know what it is to be spat at and humiliated at Israeli checkpoints, to stand in line for two hours while callous, tired soldiers are yelling at you in Hebrew. I know the beauty of the beach in Tel Aviv, the beauty of the mountains around Nablus, and the beauty that both peoples often possess as well.
Still, knowing something about both sides, I wouldn't say that Palestinian terrorism is unprovoked, as though it occurs in a vacuum. (You and I would agree, however, that it is wrong.) The very manner in which Israel has conducted its 40+ year occupation is a provocation to Palestinians. Before there were suicide bombers in Israel, there was an Israeli policy that took land from Palestinians to build illegal settlements, that rounded up and either threw in jail or exiled Palestinians who advocated for justice and even nonviolent resistance (see the case of Mubarak Awad) and freedom. In their own ways, both sides have provoked the other. And I am convinced that if there is to be peace, people from both sides will need to recognize the ways in which they have indeed provoked the other, and to acknowledge, somehow, that what they've done is wrong.
As for the specific issue of house demolitions, this too had been going on for many years before there were suicide bombers. Even today few Israelis know much about the issue because, I think, it just isn't too important to them. It isn't an issue that affects them, so it isn't an issue they devote time or care toward. And this, I think, is part of the problem in Israel/Palestine.
Do you ever think about how many Arabs nations surround this Jewish State and promote hatred of Jews and Israel from the age of 0 amongst their youth?
I think you would actually be very surprised at how many Israelis do know about and care about the Palestinean problems.. including the demolition of their homes. What I want to know is why didn't any of the surrounding Arab countries try to solve the issue of Palestinean refugees?
It is an age old debate for sure, and I do not feel that I am on one side and you are on the other. I feel that we both want to find a peaceful solution. There has to be some give and take. Israel and the Jews therein have to be able to feel that they are not going to be inhilated from within their own borders. Do you have any idea on how to realistically stop the problem of terrorism when children are taught this from birth?