As far as Iraq is concerned, it was a fast moving week. The Senate pulled an all nighter, Tuesday, which only resulted in the Republicans blocking a measure, for the seventh time this year, that would have changed our policy in Iraq. This latest proposal would have established a timeline for pulling out our troops.
Then, on Wednesday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid surprisingly pulled the defense bill from consideration until September, thus handing the president a two-month reprieve.
It didn’t take long for the proponents of the surge to move aggressively into the void. On Thursday, the Bush administration and military officials said that September was no longer a reasonable time in which to assess the effectiveness of the surge, that November would be much better.
And then on Friday, the Los Angeles Times reported that “evidence is mounting that military commanders favor a continuation of the buildup, which now has the troop level at 158,000, through next spring.”
It is difficult to see where this is headed. And the situation is further complicated by the fact that those who favor a pullout have ignored any strategy that would deal with the resulting chaos.
An all out eruption in Iraq could easily spread throughout an already volatile region, an area that the world’s economies depend upon for a steady supply of oil.
Senator Russ Feingold (D-Wisc) has just announced that he plans to submit a resolution censuring the president for the irregularities that occurred during the buildup to the war. However, the real challenge here, is for Congress and the administration to work out a resolution of the war itself, arguably the most difficult situation the United States has ever faced.
Given the potential impact to other countries, it would seem appropriate to accelerate the use of diplomacy. And, in that respect, while it is true that we are planning a second round of talks with Iran, we seriously need to get more countries involved.
Zalmay Khalilzad, our former ambassador to Iraq and present representative to the United Nations, wrote an opinion piece in The New York Times on Friday in which he said that the UN could "help internationalize the effort to stabilize the country." This would be a step in the right direction, but much more needs to be done in the diplomatic arena.
Our so-called enemies are not asleep at the switch. Last week, the leader of Iran was in Damascus shoring up an alliance of U.S. opponents that, according to the L.A. Times, seems to be gathering momentum.
In addition to the leader of Iran and the president of Syria, the meeting involved the leaders of Hezbollah, Hamas and the Islamic Jihad.
Meanwhile, the war in Iraq continues to claim its victims. Last week, the Department of Defense released the obituaries of 19 military personnel killed in that country, ranging in age from 19 to 38.
The website, www.icasualties.org, reports that there have now been 3,632 U.S. military deaths in Iraq since our invasion in 2003, including three whose relatives are being notified today.
Total U.S. deaths in Afghanistan stood at 352, as of July 12th, according to the Pentagon.
Among the fallen heroes was Army Sgt. Michael J. Martinez, 24, of Chula Vista, California.
Martinez was inspired to join the military by his admiration for his father, who served in the air force during the Vietnam War. Following his graduation from Eastlake High School, he was also won over by his recruiter’s argument that the army experience “could catapult him into the police agency of his choice and send him to college full time,” according to his mother, as reported in the LA Times.
Last year he was able to spend only twelve days with his son, Landon Michael, who is now one year old.
The family reported that he seemed to have a premonition of his death. He had told his wife that so many soldiers were dying or getting injured, and not being replaced, that he gave himself a month or less and he’d be dead or wounded. His wife, Ashley, said he was killed in exactly one month, to the day.
He also called her twice on the day he died. She reported that he told her, on his last call that “he just wanted me to know that he loved me, and he wanted me to keep that with me forever. Whatever happened, he’d be with me.”
He then left on what was to be his last patrol.
The Times reported that “family members note with anger that his three years of service should have ended in October - but his term was extended with orders to go to Iraq for a second time.”
His father said, “Michael didn’t volunteer to go a second time to Iraq. He was locked in.”
During his deployment, Martinez was awarded a Bronze Star and a Purple heart.
Back in Baghdad, an incredible display of normalcy briefly occurred yesterday. McClatchy Newspapers reported that police were dancing at their checkpoints as thousands of jubilant soccer fans poured into the streets after their national soccer team defeated Vietnam in a quarterfinal match of the Asia Cup in Bangkok, Thailand..
Unfortunately, at least five people were killed and 28 were wounded as the revelers fired their guns in the air, but at least, for the moment, the pall of wartime gloom was lifted.
Before the day was over, however, car bombings and shootings had returned the city to its normal level of chaos.
And today, Reuters carries the story that five Sunni tribal leaders, opposed to Al Qaeda, have been killed by a suicide bomber who drove a car, loaded with a half ton of explosives, into the house they were occupying.
UPI also reports that six police officers have been killed in Mosul, today, by an improvised explosive device, and two more have been killed by a booby-trapped body west of Kirkuk.
According to the Associated Press, American air and ground forces attacked a Shiite mosque in northeast Baghdad yesterday, and reported that they had killed six militants. Iraqi officials, however, said that the raid had killed 18 civilians, including women and children.
China View reported that we also attacked a Sunni mosque in Western Baghdad, this weekend, and detained 18 suspected militants there, including a member of Al Qaeda in Iraq.


Comments: 21
IMO: The situation in Iraq and Afganistan needs time. Neither of those 2 conflicted areas will decide the results of the greater war on terror, but both are part of it and cannot be lost. While I'm sorry it had to be our troops in harm's way I can't help but wonder..."if not us then who will take up arms against this great enemy?" Europe is folding as far as I'm concerned, if not already done for. We are it my friend.
God bless the troops fighting for freedom! God protect the Iraqi people! May a day soon come when we never have to hear news like this.
The censure carries no weight...It would be purely symbolic....I think it's unlikely to be approved, but who knows...
Always good to here from Guam, Ty....Hope all is well there....
Thanks also for your comments, James, Mike, Gustavo and Katie....
"And the situation is further complicated by the fact that those who favor a pullout have ignored any strategy that would deal with the resulting chaos."
I totally agree that this is something that needs to be done. A plan for getting the troops out is great, but if it isn't part of a broader plan that deals with what happens afterward, it's not a good plan.
The thing that gets me is that there are a number of different plans that have been developed, but I guess the politicians are too busy trying to decide how to position themselves to care.
Thanks for all the other good intel.
Wil, I hate to believe that politics trumps the safety of our troops, but sometimes it seems that the Dems want nothing more than to have this percolate right into the next election...
Joseph, my article last Wednesday, "The Iran Smokescreen," might be of interest to you. It went into great detail relative to the possible Saudi involvement in Iraq. Your point relative to the possible extermination of the Sunnis is interesting...
An all out eruption in Iraq could easily spread throughout an already volatile region, an area that the world's economies depend upon for a steady supply of oil."
The tragically sad fact, David, is that the course Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld set us on in so improvidently deciding to intervene unilaterally, and without justification, in Iraq, was destined, from the outset, to produce exactly that result. The country is in flames, and it is only a matter of time before a devastating explosion takes place. We may be, just barely, keeping the lid on, for now, but we are only delaying the virtually inevitable. There are NO good, or even marginally acceptable, solutions to this conundrum.
Some high-minded conservative pundits claim that we have a moral obligation to keep our troops in the crosshairs because, if we abandon Iraq to its fate, some 10,000 Iraqis (inexplicably calculated) will die in every succeeding month as a result. That may well be. And guess what guys? Their blood will be on the hands of the neocon cohort/cabal who conceived this entire disastrous mess, with YOUR ethusiastic support and connivance.
Interesting points, Mike...Differences of opinion are what make Gather the absorbing site that it is, and I appreciate that you expressed your views.
Another huge difference between this war and any previous one, Spartan and Mike, is that we are fighting a movement, and not a particular country or countries. The complexities of that type of situation, as we encounter them, are rewriting the book on "warfare."
It would be nice to be able to withdraw from Iraq, and put the whole mess behind us. However, that is probably not a realistic outcome. The mad genie is out of the bottle and he's even madder as a result of our invasion of Iraq, which - according to all analysts - has energized Al Qaeda to a great degree.
This is not to say that we should continue to place our troops in harms way for the purpose of routing out the insurgents. Based on the experience of the last four plus years, that policy would seem to be like killing flies on a horse farm. Will the next two, three, four months change all that? I don't know, but it appears doubtful.
Right now it looks like the perpetrators of this war are simply making a desperate last effort to justify what has so far been a major fiasco.