My question/comment. Why do you think you have experience to be President when experience usually involves having already held the said position, and (the second part to the question is:) Why do you undermine the Constitution, "the people", and the Framers when they (the Framers) clearly identified what was necessary to be President. You seem to scoff at those requirements, touting your "experience" when you have none as President. I could understand it if you were George Bush Sr, or George Bush Jr, Bill Clinton or Jimmy Carter, but YOU ARE NOT! Please explain all this "Presidential" experience.
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
Please select the part of the post you are reporting.
Please select why you are reporting this content.
Please enter a description.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
rate
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 3
My question/comment. Why do you think you have experience to be President when experience usually involves having already held the said position, and (the second part to the question is:) Why do you undermine the Constitution, "the people", and the Framers when they (the Framers) clearly identified what was necessary to be President. You seem to scoff at those requirements, touting your "experience" when you have none as President. I could understand it if you were George Bush Sr, or George Bush Jr, Bill Clinton or Jimmy Carter, but YOU ARE NOT! Please explain all this "Presidential" experience.