Version 2:
Have you ever wanted to kill someone? What if you knew killing them would be easy? Just point and click. The person dies a painful death weeks later. Nothing ties the death back to you. Would you do it? Would you at least be tempted? What if you knew anyone could do the same thing to you? Point. Click. You die, never knowing who killed you.
I saved you—saved society--from having to answer those questions. I lost my soul doing it, but I also found Tara.
Version 1:
Have you ever wanted to kill someone? What if you knew killing them would be easy? Just point and click. The person dies a painful death weeks later. Nothing ties the death back to you. Would you do it? Would you at least be tempted? What if you knew anyone could do the same thing to you? Point. Click. You die painfully, never knowing who killed you.
I saved you—saved society--from having to answer those questions. I may have literally lost my soul saving you, but I also married a wonderful woman as a result of my efforts.


Comments: 27
If I had to offer any suggestions at all, I'd consider the following:
On this phrase. "Point. Click. You die painfully, never knowing who killed you," I'd consider something like this: "Point. Click. You're as good as dead." I only suggest this because you so nicely painted the "painful death" premise in the opening sentences, and I think that saying it twice actually detracts from what is a chilling concept.
I'd also consider changing "I also married a wonderful woman," to something like "I met my soul mate" or "I captured the woman of my dreams." I only suggest this because I worry that saying you married her in the opening paragraph gives away the ending of what is sure to be a great story.
I liked this a lot!
I do agree with Sherrie's comments. One idea for your last sentence might be something like:
"I literally lost my soul saving you, but at least I got something out of it -- a wonderful woman."
Some considerations:
1. Kill "someone" and then killing "them." Someone is singular but them is plural. You might want to say "him" in the second instance. Also, either him or her would be specific and make the reader think that you have someone particular in mind.
2. I may have literally lost my soul... If he really lost his soul, omit "may have."
3. ...but I also married a wonderful woman as a result of my efforts. For me, this phrase drains out all the superb tension you created in the first part of the paragraph. It turns this from something chilling to something common. Part of it may be the smooth quality of the phrasing. Your words/phrases were staccato before this. This one may be too perfect in comparison.
Also, since he lost his soul, consider using found instead of married. Something like--
I may have quite literally lost my soul saving you, but I found my life in Sally.
4. "Lost my soul" and "as a result of my efforts" may not be cliches, but they are common phrases. If you do make some kind of change, you might consider dropping one of them.
A really good opening.
I also wonder about the second question right up front. The first is very powerful, but to have them back to back detracts from the first a bit. Point and click. Internet? Paid killer? hmmmmm, I can't figure it out. I'd definitely read more. Nice job!!!
I've seen suggestions for losing one of the "painful death" mentions in the first graph -- if you go that route, I want to mention that the second one hit me harder in the gut as a reader. It personalized the situation/issue for me by making me. First you made me realize that the tables could be turned and I could be killed in this way. But then just the use of that word painful in relation to my own death? That stung because I think many people fear the possibility their own death would be painful.
I really liked the twist of the ending -- with the narrator losing everything we'd think would be important only for us to learn he'd apparently found love in the process. I do like some of the suggestions for changing this thought's expression up a bit, though.
This opening makes me think and that's always going to draw me into a story. This one definitely hits the mark.
I echo the marriage wording - but this is coming from a happily divorced woman who knows sometimes marriage doesn't mean a happy ending.
I agree with Beth, though, that the end of the paragraph undoes all the lovely tension you had going. I'd leave it out. The fact that he's found his soulmate while losing his soul will be clear by the end of the story.
Cathy
I kind of like have the telegraph of true love at the beginning. Often I won't delve in if it looks like it's going to be blood and guts and no pay off. Then again, I do tend to favor romance, so maybe it's just me. I like what you've done.
I'm reading these a second time. Boy, with so many terrific entries, this included, it's going to be torture to rank them.
Love the first person and talking to the reader! Absolutely love it! So many times we're told you can't do that, but it can and does work, as you've proven. Good on ya! (some "Aussie-ness" for the Wombats!)
Topic good. Wording good. Talking to the reader... Not for me. Unless you plan to talk to the reader for an entire novel. That might work.
To be honest... at the end of the paragraph (I did want to keep reading). So good job.
These comments pertain to the 2nd version.
I had a problem in the original version wrt literally losing your soul and getting married. But you scrubbed that away nicely in the second version (assuming Tara is a person and not a plantation in Georgia), and I'm left with no suggestions.
Nicely done. Waiting to see how this all happened.
I don't know if I'd mention Tara yet, but that's just me. Maybe a hint at something better: I lost my soul, but I gained something else. Yada Yada Yada - This is really good!:)
Nothing needs changing, but here's a slight change in punctuation to consider.
I saved you—saved society--from having to answer those questions. I lost my soul doing it.
But I found Tara.
Just personal taste, but I really love those punchy lines that stand alone as paragraphs. They catch both my ear and my eye. As I said, not a needed change by any measure. Just something to consider.
Great job, Dale.