Something ominous is going on in Iran right now – and it has nothing to do with nuclear weapons. The ruling clerics – and their pet poodle, Ahmadinejad – are striking back. One fact that America and the West have perhaps not grasped fully is that the Iranian hard liners are so conservative, they make George Bush and the Republicans look like bleeding heart liberals. When they feel threatened, they are going to hit back with a vengeance – and they are not going to bother about niceties like fundamental rights and due process of law. I know this first hand, because I have lived through Ayatollah Khomeini’s Islamic Revolution in 1979.
And why are Ahmadinejad and his black-robed masters worried? Because Iran’s economy is in a mess. This is particularly inexcusable, since Iran is not one of those basket-case Islamic countries, like Sudan or Aden. Iran is literally sitting on a sea of oil. The country’s oil reserves are second only to Saudi Arabia and far greater than those of Iraq. Like the cash rich Saudis, Iranians should be awash in petrodollars. Ordinary Saudi citizens have most basic services provided free of cost by their government; and most of them do not even pay income tax. Ordinary Iranians, on the other hand, are seeing a steady downward curve in their standard of living. Before the Islamic Revolution, one US dollar would fetch you 70 Iranian Rials; now it will get you more than 9000. Not surprisingly, inflation is going through the roof. Ahmadinejad’s government had promised economic prosperity for the people; not an unrealistic goal considering that Iran is the world’s second largest oil producer and oil prices are going up all the time. However, it has failed to deliver on almost all fronts. The supreme irony is that Iran is now seriously considering rationing gasoline.
It wasn’t supposed to be like this. This is the government that got rid of the corrupt and blasphemous Shah, to usher in a pure Islamic state – even if it was a millennium behind the times. This is the government that got rid of godless Western evils like dating and dancing and movies that promoted debauchery and demeaned women. This is the government that ‘saved’ women and kept them pure, by covering them up and forbidding social interaction with the opposite sex; unless chaperoned and sanctioned by the husbands. This is the government that promoted jihad against the ‘enemies’ of Mohammed and Allah. In fact, everything they did was in the name of Allah. In all fairness, Allah should have gratefully blessed them and their nation with riches and other bounties.
Only Allah did not. And this is what really terrifies Iran’s ruling clergy, including the Supreme Leader. If the glorious Islamic Revolution is perceived to be a failure – and many ordinary Iranians are starting to wonder if it was all worth it – their authority would be seriously undermined. I have a hunch, that one reason that Iran is acting so belligerent over the nuclear processing issue, is that it is almost trying to goad the West into imposing economic sanctions. Then they can blame the Great Satan and his allies for their country’s woes. As it is, Iran has been using American support for a change in government as well as a possible military attack, as a pretext to hound its opposition and its sympathizers. Saddam Hussein used the sanctions to good effect; making sure ordinary Iraqis were so busy despising the West, that they almost had no energy left to hate Saddam. George Bush – and Europe – did not get it in Iraq; and they are not getting it now.
The current crackdown is focusing on labor leaders, universities, the press, women's rights advocates and Iranian-Americans, three of whom have been in prison for more than six weeks. But this is just the beginning. I have personally witnessed what the Islamic republic of Iran is capable of. This was soon after Khomeini arrived in Iran in 1979. Hundreds, who did not support the revolution, were tried in kangaroo courts, convicted in one day, after a farcical ‘trial’ and executed the very next morning. Women who did not completely cover their hair had their heads shaved; and those that were caught with make up and lipstick had their lips slashed with a razor blade.
Of course, the government may not be able to get away with such brutality this time. Back in 1979, the majority of the population backed the Ayatollahs. Even educated Iranians, who were secretly horrified at the excesses committed, kept silent. Perhaps, it was the price to be paid to usher in a pure Islamic state. And if everyday life was hard, many were content to wait for the 72 virgins till they reached paradise.
However, the present generation of Iranians – having waited almost 30 years for a grateful Allah to transform their land into a Garden of Eden – are not so patient; or forgiving. They have endured their incomes steadily decline, in real terms; their individual freedoms curtailed; and the ignominy of witnessing the Great Satan growing ever more prosperous, while they sink deeper into an economic quagmire.
A brief aside about Iranians would be appropriate at this stage. Many Westerners tend to club Iran together with the rest of the Muslim world. Iranians, however, are not Arabs; and would be highly offended if so addressed. Iran, after all, ruled over a vast empire stretching from Europe to India, even before the advent of Alexander the Great – at a time when Arabs were nomadic tribes, scrounging in the desert. Iranians pride themselves on their history and culture; and consider themselves infinitely more civilized than their Arab brethren. Even in today’s Islamic Iran, women – notwithstanding the restrictions on dress and social behavior – are far more equal to men than their counterparts in, say, Saudi Arabia.
Today’s generation, then, is fed up with its government, The ruling mullahs seem to be doing all right for themselves, but very little of the promised prosperity is trickling down. The people are questioning their leaders and asking for accountability. Which is the one thing they are not likely to get. Ahmadinejad and his gang are responding the only way they know how – with brute force.
Ideally, they would like to roll back the clock to 1979 and usher in a cultural revolution, when religious zeal and anti-imperialist sentiments carried the day; and helped cloak the shortcomings of the government. It is not likely to work this time. Most Iranians are still devout Muslims, but only the hoi polloi are still consumed with anti-imperialist fervor. Many of them are secretly envious of the West and would love to emulate that lifestyle.
Dissemination of ‘alien’ ideas is precisely what the government fears most. Satellite dishes have long been banned in Iran; and now the regime is censoring any news it deems detrimental – to itself, that is. That is why so little has been permitted to be discussed in the Iranian news media. Instead, attention has been strategically focused on Ahmadinejad's political enemies, like the former president, Mohammad Khatami. What was Khatami’s crime? He shook hands with an unfamiliar woman after he gave a speech in Rome. Khatami, the lost hope of Iran's reform movement, felt compelled to rebut the accusation because such a handshake is religiously suspect, but contended that the crowd seeking to congratulate him for his speech was so tumultuous that he could not distinguish between the hands of men and women.
The government is cracking down in other ways too. Young men wearing T-shirts deemed too tight, or haircuts seen as too Western, have been paraded bleeding through Tehran's streets by uniformed police officers. To add to their humiliation, they are forced to suck on plastic jerry cans, a toilet item Iranians use to wash their bottoms. The country's police chief has boasted that 150,000 people were detained in the annual spring sweep against any clothing considered not Islamic. More than 30 women's rights advocates were arrested in one day in March, five of whom have since been sentenced to prison terms of up to four years. They were charged with endangering national security for organizing an Internet campaign to collect more than a million signatures supporting the removal of all laws that discriminate against women. Eight student leaders at Tehran University, the site of one of the few public protests against Ahmadinejad, disappeared into Evin Prison starting in early May. Student newspapers had dared to publish articles suggesting that no humans were infallible, including the Prophet Muhammad and Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
A free and independent press is usually the first victim of this kind of ‘cultural revolution’ and Iran is no exception. The country's newspaper editors have been issued a ‘directive’, detailing banned topics, including the rise in gasoline prices; or other economic woes like possible new international sanctions, negotiations with the United States over the future of Iraq, civil society movements and the Iranian-American arrests. Professors have been warned against attending overseas conferences; or having any contact with foreign governments. The official government line is that they risk being recruited as spies. The Iranian-Americans are all being detained, basically on the grounds that they were either recruiting, or somehow abetting, an American attempt to achieve a "velvet revolution" in Iran.
On the face of it, the internal turmoil in Iran is a good thing for George Bush and his allies. If Iran is consumed by its own mess, maybe it will foster less mischief outside its boundaries. It would be unwise to become complacent, however. When things get too hot, the classic tactic employed by people like Ahmadinejad is to create a ‘diversion’. What that diversion may be is anybody’s guess. The only certainty is that it is something America and the West need to be wary about.


Comments: 14
But I am simply not able to think that how come you are thinking and writing this much long article totally based on anti Islamic Republic of Iran propaganda by United States. If you refer to two days back Asian Age news paper, you can see similar lines in which it is written about rationing gasoline.
As being an intellectual and having knowledge about Islamic Republic, I request you to do some research on basic ground facts of Iran (please don't base your research on documentary of BBC, National Geography, etc. who just take interviews of handful of outlawed non government loving people and portray it as the whole of the country is thinking same), then you will come to know much more about the real facts of Iran. For your kind information, I have visited Iran just last year July, where I have attended speeches of President and Supreme Leader in which the crowd was overwhelming and was totally in favor of their government. When I was traveling with one of my friend from Mashhad to Tehran, I came across a group of youths of age around 16 - 17 yrs and asked them what is there business / job, they replied that they are earning 100,000 tomans, which is sufficient for a youth to run his house in Iran, in painting business and all of their other friend in their small city of Shahrud are doing more or less similar kind of work getting similar income. These are the ground realities. The government is giving free land line telephones, free LPG to every house hold, free home and jobs to needy people, and many similar kind of thing.
With all this, I think you are forgetting the sanctions which are applied to the Islamic Republic from the BIG SATAN (US) due to which the currency value is down. But this downfall in currency value has nothing to do with scientific and economic progress of Islamic Republic, as they had outperformed in last 28 yrs of revolution in all the fields of nuclear, medical, automobile, industrial sectors. Not like those Arab countries which are puppet of Western countries.
From all these things, it is clear that your complete article is based on fake propaganda of western countries. Rather the fact is Iranian government is firm and can give tough challenge to US in current situation.
And you can also find many anti government factors in every country including US and India, this doesn't mean that US and Indian governments are in grave danger. So please broaden your vision and refine your thoughts and come out of US propaganda.
.
When I studied comparative politics last year, Iran was used as an example of how Democracy may work in Islamic countries. The delicate situation in an Islamic country is that unlike much of western philosophy, Islam finds that God's law is supreme, superceding any laws by man. Although for the most part these laws do not contradict each other, there are some interpretation of the Qur'an which call for many traditions and laws which the west sees as backwards and uncivilized.
But these most of these contradictions are interpretations and this is where Islam struggles with incorporating a philosophical democracy with Islam. In many cases throughout history, Islam was very tolerant to religions other than their own, consider the Mughal Empire, especially those religions deemed to be "brothers of the book," such as Christianity and Judaism, and many Jews preferred to live under Islamic rule than Christian rule. The Christians deemed the Jewish people blasphemous to the true religion, Christianity, and Jews were slaughtered right along side the Muslims during the Crusades. So Islam need not be exclusive in rule; the past has provided a map for a successful execution of an Islamic state in which Islam is the ruling religion, (like Christianity is in the West), but not the only religion allowed and practiced.
Iran has moved far from the 1979 Revolution. Many younger citizens today are looking for more progressive ways. The problem the West has is in dealing with the fact that some of these ideas are not ITS way of democracy. This is an issue which provides for many Muslims to feel that the West is again pursuing its own agenda instead of allowing THEIR system to work its way through. Unless you've walked in the shoes of another, it is erroneous to sit in judgement.
Suggestion for US is that they first give freedom to media and stop influencing them .
Then the badly need the nuclear technology for their energy requirment.
So they can make some money by saving the Gas. Which they use for Energy Requirments.
Firoze is an ethenic Iranian. trying to help their cause.
Good article Firoze. Too bad you are not on the presidents cabinet; but the guy they had with a bit of sense of things; Colin Powell was pushed out. Now they seem to all be in accord; which is not necessarily a good thing.
Although I am conservative in my politics; the best thing that may come out of the next election will possibly be a new cabinet in which there may be some free thinkers willing to think out of the box. It seems the current group just have oil and profits on their mind and the best way to keep that going.
I hate saying that; but do think it is true.
Blessings - S.
The general problem of moral corruption is very great, and power over other people is perhaps the deepest challenge to a person's morality. Power over others inflates the sense of self without creating any real strength to support that inflation. A large empty space of consciousness feels its own insecurity, but cannot defend it. It falls victim to what used to be called "demonic possession" which at worst uses human capacities to attack other human beings with violence and cruelty.
It is the very best thing about the USA that, internally at least, we have created some space of freedom for most individuals to try to be who they are. "Toleration" was a great principle of this nation, since so many who came at first were religious refugees.
On another level, however, "American" power -- power based in America, but spread now widely across the world -- is immense. It is used "as needed to protect American interests" in the form of open military violence but is exercised most strongly in "soft" ways that influence consumers of products and services but also in attempts to control markets as by the World Trade Organization. My parents, with many of their generation, referred to this as "worshipping the Almighty Dollar." It is difficult to fight the moral corruption of this great power that the "national interest" of the USA exercises over others.
That same corruption is at work when anyone, in a village, province, state, nation, chooses force -- soft force or hard force, indoctrination or coercion -- as the path of leadership.
Of course all of this disrespect for other human individuals comes ultimately from a very ancient idea, which was actually true in more ancient times, that some people are more developed in their capacities (more filled with spiritual potential) and should be served by those with lesser capacities. I believe we have passed the time once and for all when such an idea should be the basis of social power. The light of conscience can be awakened in any individual, and that should be the goal of leadership. We do not really hear this as a political thought anywhere, but it is, indeed, a political thought.
So Abraham Lincoln: "As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master." So Thomas Jefferson: "I have sworn on the altar of Almighty God eternal enmity toward every form of tyranny over the mind of man." But these voices are not heard very often as part of America's public discussion today.
Iran and India are very great and ancient civilizations. It is important to all humanity that they develop their own gifts again (and not just economic capacities) so that they can enrich the new global civilization that is forming.