Michael Moore has made a new documentary called Sicko, about the healthcare system in the United States. His basic premise is that people, all of them, are entitled to medical care, without respect to their ability to pay.
Is that true? Should everyone be entitled to medical care? Just basic care, or all care? What do you think?


Comments: 28
Its ways past time to nip this BS in the bud.
How about the right to raise your own children? That's not in the constitution.
A basic human right does not originate from the United States constitution, Snookiedimples. It is something that one would... well... hold self-evident, like all humans being equal, and being able to pursue happiness, live their lives, and be free.
So funny to watch the Dittoheads try to make everything political - even a discussion about philosophy.
We already pay for the unisured . . . so we're paying anyway. How much less would it take to prevent the major expenditures by allowing access to needed care at a preventative - and not a catastrophic stage. And how much more humane. I also don't think it needs to be Constitutional to be legal . . . laws are passed all the time . . . . but I think it IS one of the things the Constitution was written to protect . . . . . . form a more perfect Union . . . promote the general welfare . . . " so we should be able to design a system to care for our people along the lines listed in our Constitution, with less expense . . .
Of course, the medical and pharmaceutical industries (who are so VERY much concerned with our health) might have other thoughts on the subject. Does it make any sense at all to use a supply and demand system when it comes to saving your life?? I have what you need to live . . . now . . . I'll set a price based on what you're willing to pay. I use the Fire Department as an analogy . . . You'll notice it works even though it's a big Socialist organization . . . and not a series of competing Fire Departments charging people based on demand. Some things simply should not be sold to the highest bidder . . . like life, protection from fire, National Security . . .
We have the potential to be better than we are and the vast majority of Americans want to see coverage.
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
I have a bridge to sell you.
Entitled to health care? No, unless you are infirm, developmentally delayed, or otherwise incapacitated.
And, yes, I've been on both sides of the equation.
This country is not the 'land of the handout'. At least last time I looked it wasn't.
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
I do not think that Healthcare should be a basic thing that at birth to death a person is guaranteed. If that was the case, then as in most governmental programs, some would take advantage of it, others would be too lazy to take care of themselves, and others would not appreciate it.
I am not saying everyone, but the persuasive argument to not have guaranteed health care; even though I am dependent on healthcare, seems more appealing than to have a guaranteed health care system.
No one has plainly offered me the true benefits that would outweigh the negatives.
I say basic health care is a human right. Other industrialized nations have been providing it for decades. No reason why we can't get it too.
The US of my youth was a country that would be the best or at the very least STRIVE to be the best at everything. Now . . . with 3 dozen other countries doing this better . . . with people dying from this lack of proper care . . . you STILL see morons who state, for NO reason . . . "Nope, we shouldn't cover everybody. Let's just pay the money instead." It's insane. My country deserves so much better than this . . . and this MUST change . . . we simply cannot afford to continue this way.
Regards,
Doyle I <~~~~~
It is also not possible to "take care of yourself" and thus avoid such things as a broken leg from an accidental fall, contracting the flu that turns into pneumonia, or having a hernia go bad.
I believe there should be some form of basic health insurance that is affordable for everyone. Note I said affordable. Also, there should be some sort of inexpensive catastrophic insurance that spreads the risk across millions and thus keeps the price down. I don't think it should be free. There should be a monthly cost and also a deductible and copayments. People tend to abuse and overuse that which is handed to them free.
As for basic health care...I'm not sure it's a right, but, it ought to be a basic human obligation towards your fellow human beings.
It's real easy to sit back and point fingers at "greedy" hospitals/doctors, but it's quite another to come up with a viable, workable option.
There are problems in these systems--a bureaucracy will make mistakes, and sometimes there are long waits. The point is, those very same things happen with the private system too, but the latter create other problems in addition, as their main purpose is not to provide health care, but to make a profit. Not just any profit, in fact, but the larger, the better. And, obviously, the way to make that profit is by collecting premiums as high as you can get away with, and denying every claim you can possibly deny. As a result, in the US people either have no health insurance, or they are paying much more to get the same things that people in the universal coverage systems get. In fact, sometimes less, as private insurance companies restrict what doctors you can see, what hospitals you can go to, etc more and more.
(My description of a universal health insurance scheme applies to democratic capitalist countries. I don't know how the Cuban system works. Mostly it looks like the people are barely paid any salary at all, so there's no need to "pay back" into a health scheme....)
Aparently I have not worked thru this issue yet. sorry for the rant.