Some stories in the UK last week ought to remind us that freedom and democracy (or freeman moxy if you are American) is being eroded by creeping fascism.
First story concerns the fatigued firefighters of Bury. They were in trouble over sleeping while on shift. Now everyone knows fire brigade staff are allowed a kip on the watch so that they will be fresh and alert when called to action. It was not the actual sleeping that caused the problem but the blatant breaches of regulations involved. Special regulation chairs had been provided, tired firefighters for the use of. Bury's finest however were using their own sleeping bags and kipping on the floor because having tried the special reclining chairs the crews decided they were not fit for purpose. "You can't bloody sleep in those, they're like piles of rock" one officer said.
It turned out the crews could not sleep properly in the chairs because they had not been trained in the proper use of the special sleeping furniture. The chairs should not even have been sat on by untrained personnel.
So now you know that if you are troubled with insomnia its probably because you have not been trained properly in sleeping.
Next is the woman whose hip replacement operation was cancelled because she was six pounds overweight. This is part of the National Health Service initiative to encourage anorexia by witholding treatments from those who are obese. Only a bureaucrat working for a fascist regime could possible make a thick line on a spreadshhet and say "OK, above the line they don't get treatment because they are anorexic and their problems are self inflicted, below the line they don't get treatment because they are fat bastards and their problems are self inflicted. And if they are exactly on the line they are so treatment will be withheld until they tell us what we want to hear..
The person whose op was cancelled did get some help and support from her sympathetic family doctor who gave her laxatives hoping the resultant diarreah would get the numbers right for the spreadsheet.
Next we go to our old favourite the education system. There is an idea being pushed in the Education Department that asking children to put up their hands in class to answer questions should be banned as "it causes the quieter, less demanding children to be overlooked and fall behind." Well the two Primary teachers I know both tell me that the noisier, more demanding children don't answer questions to get praise, they are more interested in being disruptive to make their friends laugh. Then there are the noisy little victims of pushy parenting who wave their hands frantically and yell, "me sir, me sir, me me me," hoping to earn a housepoint to report to the pushy parents because they have been told "if you don't get straight As Mummy and Daddy will not love you anymore because you have not lived up to our expectations". Can the "educationalists" not see that the quiet, thoughful kids who don't answer questions are actually taking stuff in and thinking about it?
And then of course there are the clever little shits who sit picking their fingernails as the teacher seeks a correct answer. They are thinking, " I know this but I can't be arsed answering. I'm nobody's poodle. One who fitted this description is sitting not a million miles from the keyboard this artyicle is being typed on.
Do you see the thrust of all this?
So many of the little things that happen almost unnoticed are driving us towards becoming a society of obedient conformists conditioned to blindly follow rules and procedures and to never, never ever question authority.
|
by
Ian Thorpe
Member since:
January 30, 2006 Every Day In Every Way Tyranny Creeps A Little Closer
June 04, 2007 12:31 PM EDT
views: 138
|
rating: 8.5/10
(6 votes)
|
comments: 21
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
More by Ian Thorpe |
||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16836, "Oz"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 21
Some things that are tried in education are sometimes not based on sound research. Someone in some far away office, as you point out, decides how things should be and make it a policy.
What is this term "freeman moxy?' I have never heard any one use it.
I found the example of the woman who was refused hip replacement surgery because she was six pounds overweight somewhat funny. I can see why it would be beneficial for your National Health Service to decide it wants people to be within their ideal weight. It is a part of prevention. People who are fat tend to use the most resources because they develop illnesses that could have been avoided. Hip replacement surgery may not be urgently required, but I hope people who do need immediate treatment are not denied it because they are too fat.
Every workplace has the right to have rules and standards. This should be no less true at firehouses. This is not to say that some rules do not make sense or simply cannot work in certain places. In the case of the firemen, the special chairs should have been removed from the firehouse and something more suitable to provide them with a more restful sleep should be placed. I always thought firemen had beds. This shows how much I know about where firemen and women are expected to sleep.
I fail to see how these things are paving the way for tyranny. No one is being treated cruelly or unjustly. I'm sure the requirements for obtaining medical treatment are completely available for the fat woman. No one told her to gain weight. She cannot claim the system is treating her unfairly or causing her pain. Which one of your examples points to a future in which people in the United Kingdom shall find their government (local and national) dealing with them in an extremely harsh and severe fashion.
I find this comment to be rather tasteless and supercilious. Of course you are physically perfect in every way...
Who's definition of her ideal weight were they working from. If the physician's decision was based on her BMI then it's based on a meaningless number. If the ratio of body fat/muscle was used to determine her suitability for the surgery then the physician (assuming it is a physician who is making the decision) has a valid basis for this decision.
If the decision was made by a non-medical person this is then a worse case of prejudice on the part of some bureaucrat who's only job is to save the Health Care System money at the expense of those patients who are dependent on it for their medical care.
The point of this piece, which you miss completely, is that it would be nice if these stories had not happened because a little common sense was applied instead of brainless people substituting stupid rules for intelligent thought.
So you think primary school kids can be induced to sit quietly and wait to be chosen to answer a question. What kind of drugs do they put in the milk at the school your kids attend?
Years ago my doctor told me I was clinically obese. I am short, stocky and very heavily muscled. I have a picture of me rowing at the time, six pack showing, shoulder muscles rippling, waisdt pinched in. And I was over forrty. Yet, along with Arnie Scxhwartzenegger, Mike Tyson and Olympc spinter Lynford Christie I was obese because the bureaucracy preferred to use a discredited statistic rather than empirical evidence. That one is rather close to my heart.
But you just don't get anything do you? Would it not have made sense to consult the firefighters, the guys actually doing the job, about rest arrangements rather than adopting a high handed and dictatorial attitude.
BTW "freeman moxy" is your President's best attempt at the phrase "freedom and democracy."
I would say Edward that you are wholeheartedly in favour of tyranny as it saves individuals the inconvenience of having to think for themselves
It is jhappening there. Yoiyr media is much more govdernment friendly than ours.
We get American celebs appearing on TV talk shows and commenting on how great it is that celebrities can speak their minds in Britain.
No doubt Edward is going to want names, he seems to be a man who needs things explained in great detail. Well in the past few weeks Kevin Spacey, Dustin Hoffman, Susan Sarandon, John Barroman (I think he is better known here than in his homeland) Angelina Jolie, George Clooney and those are just the ones I can think of off the top of my head
I was caught by a speed camera a couple of years ago. It clocked me at 36mph in a 30 zone. But I was doing less than thirty. The camera was strategically placed so that cars going towards it are just at a point where the down gradient steepens sharply. And my car is low nosed, two factors that increase the "slip" factor (the radar beam is triggered by a false echo)
After two years the police droped the case. They took one look at my technical dossier (I used to work with computer networks) and actually removed the camera because I had informed the media it was fraudulent.
The government will soon drop its ID cards scam. It was not the idea of carrying official ID that sank it, but the fact that we were going to have to pay for them.
We're fighting back.
I am actually in the process of building a civil disobedience website which will be called "They Can't Put Us All In Prison."
I have not been idle while awat from Gather.
I reckon Edward's devotion to rules and regulations and his humour bypass indicate he is the advance guard of a new Dalek attempt to usurp the Presidency when Bush steps down. They must have developed a way to graft a Dalek mindset into a human body.
I can be very silly when people make the mistake of taking themselves too seriously.
Catch Doctor Who on BBC America, series 3 including the episode linked above is still showing here but will be with you in a few months. Meanwhile series 1 & 2 have already been shown and will be repeated ad infinitum for sci - fi fans
People don't think its OK but we Brits don't make a fuss, we just stick chewing gum in the lenses and blame the local kids :-)
If it had gone to a vote they would not have been accepted. It was introduced by stealth and civil rights organisations taking the issue to court are being tied up in legal procedure.
So because to remove the cameras is "criminal damage" the public resort to sneaky tactics. And when that chewing gum sets hard in the lens its a bugger to remove.
Americans like to believe media reports that we Brits are very compliant and emotionally repressed but these are misleading. While recycling of rubbish seems to be a way of life in the US, the British public have shrugged their shoulders and said, so what? because we know it take more energy to recycle rubbish into something useful than to make new.
The main thrust of our conservation efforts should be aimed at consuming less but the gloibal economy is built on a model that requires us to consuime more.
Does the phrase Catch 22 spring to mind?
Now I am getting a bit serious about gather again I will be bringing stuff like this to my pages.
best,
Ian
Its actually one of the things Americans love about Britain that makes it possible for civil srervants to act in such a high handed way - the Monarchy. The Queen has no powers to intervene in anything but the civil service work for her rather than the elected government. Thus the procedures to overturn an unpopular decision take years.
So mostly what happens is people just ignore things and get on with life.
In some areas a recent clampdown on illegal parking has led to a backlog of three years from the ticket being issued to the fine being processed. And so everybody catches on and just disputes every ticket and the system collapses.
Its a very British way of doing things :-)