Tired of being Spammed???
I sure am. It's getting real old!
I've said it before and I will say it again. When you connect with somone, they have the OPTION to be notified when you publish an article. It's an OPTION. If they want to know when you post, they would have that OPTION turned on and receive the notification.
There is no need to then send a message to all your connections about the article you just posted. THEY ALREADY KNOW, if they wanted to know.
Your connections know when you post. Can someone please tell me the point of then sending a message to all your connections on Gather about the article, they already know you posted?
Maybe I am the one that missed something!


Comments: 29
I don't mind being notified when someone is being featured or when someone wants to introduce a new member or even when someone wants to make sure you read a particular article by another member...............but it is annoying to me when I get a daily posts to read YOUR articles, when we are connected anyway....
I can't read all of my conenctions on a daily basis, but I do scan all Articles for Me and pick and choose what I want to read published by my connections - the title has to be one to attract me, though...........
When you log into Gather it should first take you to a page with your icon and where your points are listed.....on that same little box will be listed connection requests penind, messages for you and pending group invites.
Some members love to send a message to everyone on their connections list at one time - once or twice is not too bad but when they do it every single time, it is more than annoying. ;-)
I love getting a personal message from someone with me and maybe 1 or 3 others on it that the article would be of great interest to, but mass mailing all connections every day gets old. I have weeded out most of the mass mailers from my connections, so now it is not as much of a problem for me.
Andrea R. has the cutest icon up there... what do we do when we find our kids standing in the toilet? Scream? Yell? Punish? NOPE, we run for the camera!
a. didn't show up anymore, and,
b. sent more spam than comments.
Manage your connections, don't acquire too many, and this shouldn't be a problem.
--I wonder if the spamming would stop if the spammers were named in the many articles complaining about it? Would it be against TOS to write an article saying "I am so tired of the daily spam I get from *****, ******, and ******"? Would that be considered defamation? It would be interesting to see if the same names kept coming up. That might stop 'em.
--Have any spam victims ever replied to the spammers directly (vs. writing an article about it), expressing their displeasure? What was the result?
--Do blocked senders know they are blocked (does the message bounce back or something)?
--If it annoys people so much, why not just block and disconnect from the person? Clearly those who do it (spam) don't think any of these many articles complaining about it apply to them. Why would people want to remain connected to such thoughtless people?
I ask these questions because I don't get mass e-mail spam from Gatherers, aside from one or two people who asked me to read their First Chapters entires. I also am pretty discerning about who I connect to.
I have been blocking. I've been disconnecting but understand that is then my time that they continue to waste. I think people who do it are very rude and uncaring people who don't understand how Gather works.
An interesting little side note to this article, since posting this article I have received more connection requests in one day. On disconnect (but I think that was for other reasons and I know who). The amount of Spam I received in one day went from many to a couple few. Now I did block a lot of people but this stopped more then the ones I blocked. Maybe, just maybe one has to get ticked and let the world know about it before a person realizes how far they pushed an issue . . .
Look out ranting groups!
At the very least, naming names would help others know who to avoid when connecting. When no one mentions any names, the perpetrators don't think the complaints apply to them.
Sara said: "I think people who do it are very rude and uncaring people who don't understand how Gather works."
Or, they are *very* aware of how it works. If you click over to their article, they get the points for your visit. Why not go to the article you're being spammed about and leaving your message there? You're giving them what they want by going to their piece but at least the likelihood of them seeing how annoyed you are is greater than them reading this article. You can also announce that you are blocking them and disconnecting.
The beauty of this is that you have a greater chance of the offender seeing your message and you can inform others who happen to be reading who the e-mail spammers are in a non-confrontational way (vs. a separate article naming names). The downside for is that you may not be comfortable telling people this up front and you wouldn't reap the points that articles about mysterious unnamed spammers seem to generate.
People spam because it works. Now that most of the points are for posting and receiving the attention of view and comments from others, it will probably get worse.