Politics is one of those subjects that you have to tread lightly on, because like religion, many people wear their political affiliations on their sleeve. Going against the grain of someone's political inclinations may lead to insults, shouting matches and the like. In 2007, the electorate is more divided than in any other time in our nation's history... Although this is a far cry from the tensions surrounding the Compromise of 1850 or the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 that eventually led to the American Civil War. As for myself, I like to fancy myself a party agnostic as it is my opinion that claiming the mantle of a party puts one in a box or more fittingly it makes me feel dirty...I like to have a host of choices, I like going to the grocery store and instead of reaching for the Cinnamon & Spice oatmeal I like to reach for the variety pack.
Something that I read recently that was an eyebrow raiser. The sons and daughters of beloved Republican icons are contemplating crossing the aisle to the (gasp) hated Democrats! Susan Eisenhower, the granddaughter of Dwight D. Eisenhower cited that the free spending ways of the Bush Presidency, the hi-jacking of her party by single-issue voters, especially pro-lifers-is driving pragmatic, fiscally conservative voters out of the GOP. She even muttered that she could vote Democratic in 2008. Theodore Roosevelt IV, the great-grandson of President Teddy Roosevelt is up in arms with George W. Bush's inattention to global warming, the record deficits incurred to support the "global war on terror", the notion of promoting democracy aboard something that President Woodrow Wilson was attacked for during his time in office. Even Barry Goldwater's daughter stated that she feels that the Republican party has "taken on more than what they can handle."
History always repeats itself and it is the contention of many historians and political pundits alike that 2008, very well may mirror the 1932 election when Franklin D. Roosevelt exploited the collapse of the GOP to build his Democratic majority. After all the latest polls show that the President's approval rating at its lowest ebb ever (28%). In looking at the Republican Presidential debates earlier last week I was not impressed, except for Ron Paul who actually sounded as if he was taking a stance on the issues, rather than saying what he thinks people want to hear to get elected, not unlike Hillary Clinton as I am not a fan of dynastic politics...
I can only wish that people would not fall into the trap of not voting for someone simply because the media and pundits say that they have no chance of winning (what do we say). My dream Presidential match-up... Ron Paul versus Dennis Kucinich sounds tantalizing... Maybe Al Gore versus Chuck Hagel... What are your thoughts?


Comments: 7
I have the same dream.
I've been often asked the question, "Why you voting for so-and-so? He or she can't win...you're wasting your' vote." Well, I make my choice after careful deliberation with myself after looking at all the candidates and their' stand on issues...now, if the candidate that most jibes with my political philosophy happens to be last on the list that won't change my mind. Above all I must be true to myself and cast my vote for whom I believe to be the best person for the job.
I dare say if more people would do this instead of listening to what the pundits on the media say and what the polls indicate maybe...just maybe, one day we can break the two Party monopoly and elect our choice and not what the political machinery selects for us.
Great article, Shun.
Felix, I really think our dream match up is on the horizon.. Its closer than what the both of the both of us may think... I have my eyes peeled!
Tamara's comment above reminded me of a book that appeared in the 1970's -- "President McGovern's Second Term" -- which dealt with the ways that even the best-intentioned most well-meaning person would be twisted by the demands of the office into a liar and dissembler.
-
-
Jim Swan's "None-Too-Great Hits" now on iTunes.
Un-HOT!!! un-lewd, un-mindless. Not the usual Top-40 stuff.
I will state, unequivocally, that even though Rep. Ron Paul has an (R) after his name, He will have my vote in a heartbeat. It should be (Lib), but they won't do that.
I have read every single one of his speeches that he's posted, and there is darn little I disagree with.
Dr. Paul has always spoken and voted his thoughts. I have written him several times urging him to run. Now he will.