U.S. Trade Deficit Sets Fifth Consecutive Record
It has many economists worried. It has politicians worried. We’ve been warned of the resulting dangers. And still it gets bigger and bigger.
Last month, the Commerce Department announced that the U.S. trade deficit set a record for the fifth consecutive year in 2006. And for the first time, the U.S. even ran a deficit on investment income.
To measure the current deficit, the Commerce Department used the broadest measure of trade, which covers not only trade in goods and services but also investment flows between countries. The current deficit also represents the amount of U.S. assets that have been transferred into foreign hands to cover the gap between American exports and imports.
And the imbalance has become staggering; it shot up 8.2 percent to $856.7 billion, representing a record 6.5 percent of the total U.S. economy. What it all means is that the United States was borrowing more than $2 billion a day to finance its trade gap.
Trade deficits are nothing new in the U.S. In fact, the U.S. has run deficits in the trade of goods every year since 1976. But this time the news is different.
The flow of investments into the U.S. turned negative by $7.3 billion, from a surplus of $11.3 billion in 2005. It marked the first time on record that investment income has been negative, going back to 1929. In simple terms, foreigners earned more on their U.S. holdings than Americans earned on their foreign investments.
The reason for this sudden downturn? Well, actually, it isn’t so sudden at all. It’s been about thirty years in the making.
For three decades America has gone into hock to foreigners through the purchase of consumer electronics, cars, clothing and other goods. In return, foreign governments have been more than willing - so far, at least - to hold American assets such as U.S. Treasury securities and U.S. corporate stocks, among other investments.
But some economists fear the possibility that U.S. investments could fall out of favor with these governments. If that were to occur, the value of the dollar would plunge, stock prices would crash and interest rates would soar. Ultimately, if U.S. investments fall out of favor with foreigners the country could be pushed into a recession.
The concern of many is that too much of our economic security has been, and continues to be, transferred into the hands of countries like Saudi Arabia, China and Japan, all of whom hold enormous amounts of U.S. government bonds and other assets.
For example, China has finally decided to diversify its huge and steadily growing foreign-exchange reserve by investing in overseas markets other than just the U.S. The move is a dramatic departure from its current practice of putting most of its eggs into one basket - US Treasury bonds.
The Chinese government announced it will set up a state-owned company to invest its $1 trillion foreign-exchange reserve in various overseas markets. That will leave the U.S. with less money to borrow – at least from China.
While much of the trade deficit is a reflection of the high price of imported oil, a weaker dollar has done little to help U.S. exports in the last couple of years. But, at last, that now appears to be changing. The weaker dollar is finally making the price of U.S. products more affordable in foreign markets. Some economists think the deficit may actually shrink this year, though marginally, for the first time since 2001.
That may help a little, but there’s still a long way to go. The break-even point in trade won’t be reached for many years – if ever.
In the meantime, the trade deficit has helped make the U.S. the world’s biggest debtor nation. As a result, the U.S. has to import $2.3 billion every day to finance its debts. Our government’s current and future obligations are now so large that they amount to half a million dollars for each U.S. household.
The truth is, America doesn’t make as much “stuff” as we used to, leaving a lot less for other nations to buy. Instead, we buy from them. That pattern may be unsustainable.
Remember the good old days of “Made in the U.S.A.”? Those days are mostly a memory now, and if you’re not old enough to remember when that actually meant something, then it doesn’t even amount to that.
Sean M. Kennedy, Money Correspondent:
Money Matters, by Gather Correspondent Sean M. Kennedy, is published every Thursday to Gather Essentials: Money.
Money Matters is a practical look at money and how developments in the American economy may affect you.
Sean is a freelance writer based in Los Angeles.
Keep up with Sean’s other postings and Gather activity by joining his Gather network at skennedy.gather.com
You’ll find Sean and other Money Correspondents, plus celebrity content and plenty of other Money experts, at Money.gather.com


Comments: 14
on a lighter note..i wonder how much is 1 trillion dollars' weight??
And yes, I am old enough to remember "Made in America". I remember it specifically referriing to clothes made in southern states, such as Tenn.
I find it terribly depressing that what was a huge surplus is now an enormous deficit....and we keep digging a deeper hole.
.....sigh....
The drop in value of the dollar is good for exports, because it makes our goods cheaper overseas and encourages tourism in the U.S. It's bad, however, because it increases the prices of imported goods, which can lead to inflation, especially in a country like the U.S which is so dependent on imported goods.
Also, if the average American increased savings, the current account deficit would decrease. The U.S is dependent on foreign investment in this country, and if savings increased there would be a net (I do emphasize net) decline in capital inflows from other countries and decrease the current account deficit.
Yet an optimist will remember how exceptional and outstanding the American people are. I recently watched an account of building the Golden Gate Bridge. Iron workers were needed in far higher numbers than were trained and ready. Great numbers of workers new to iron work were hired and, in record time, they built the greatest bridge on earth. I believe their great grandsons and this nation will do the same again.
Moreover, American corporations still design and oversee most of the manufacturing industry they moved from America to low wage nations. These corporations may support future trade arrangements that will continue to raise American living standards and support American power if they want that power to be on their side.
Trade deficits and budgets deficits are only numbers. Resources, skills and power projection tell a more complete story on which to base action.
We should maintain a national security defined core industrial capacity that guarantees America will be able to defend its land, liberty, fortune and future when we again have to produce at home whatever we now buy abroad.
No one should write predictions of doom without at least a hint of what he would do now to protect our posterity in accord with the preamble to our constitution.
See http://the-new-new-deal.wikispaces.com
Isn't this a Catch 22? If other nations stop selling to us their industry will suffer a recession and if we keep buying our money will lose its value. Other nations are equally to blame for the problem... like drug dealers they sell until their client dies of an overdose. Without the client the dealer starves to death. What a total mess.
The only answer I can see is to look at the time when our nation had a huge trade surplus. Those nations survived -- although we ended up owning most of their industry. I guess the same will happen here until we learn our lesson that betraying our own workes for the sake of profit and corporate heads that suck up all the surplus money will lower the standard of living for a majority of the middle class.
The only way I see out is to become a source of energy products and new inventions. We need to jump on alternate energy (especially ethanol which can then supply fuel to the rest of the world). With all the big oil companies moaning and groaning that we must keep drilling (to keep up their record profits) this is a job for the government. With new technology we could become the ethanol exporter for the world. Nuclear power plants off shore could make millions of tons of hydrogen. It's time to start thinking outside the box before get put inside them.
Just the ramblings of an amateur...
David, Ethanol is a political snow job. It is a scam to line the pockets of ADM and Monsanto and will do nothing but raise our fuel cost and food cost while it will not make a dent in the imports.
Fine, there are plenty of other avenues that can. I think alternative energy is an excellent place to start. And that saying it and making it so seems to be what I see more and more in other countries. We need to think that way again here. No more excuses. If we did the kind of innovation and originality we once did, we wouldn't be having this problem, at least not to the same extent.
You don't have to agree with me. But I would rather light a candle than curse the darkness, or have another cursed for lighting a match.
I'm shocked that the costs of the Iraq War are not listed anywhere in this article. Is there some reason you didn't mention it?
I am also old enough to remember "American Made." It's a shame corporate America keeps selling us out.
1) eliminate much of our trade deficit
2) improve the environment
3) aid our economy
4) make new jobs
5)get us out of the Middle East
6)get us OUT OF IRAQ !!!!!!!!!!!
7)keep us away from foreign entanglements
8)make us proud to be an American
I never said anything about using ADM or monsanto CORN which is where the mego corporations retreat in order to condemn ethanol.
I've developed a way to make ethanol bypassing all the nay-sayers and corporate lies that it can't be done. At $4 a gallon it would cost more than gas -- but not really if you add in 10,000 lives and 500 billion spent in Iraq and 1 trillion spent to threaten oil producers with a military presence. How much does oil cost then? If you add that in a gallon of gas is around $5 and there will be no end to the trade deficits, war, killing, and hatred of America. What are you willing to pay to get rid of all those side costs?
Inevitably, more industrial jobs will go to other places, especially China. But the rate of outsourcing to these places will decline. The U.S isn't the only country where there is trade/outsourcing with China (the E.U is a bigger trade partner with China than the U.S), even Japan is outsourcing jobs to China. Also, the Chinese are becoming more affluent, and more and more of their production will go to domestic consumption. Eventually, there will be a much slower rate of outsourcing because the wage advantage will be less, not because Americans are poorer, but because the Chinese will be more affluent.
One thing I suggest we all do is to limit our consumption of poisonous imported food from China.
The truth is, we don't really have to anymore.....
hell, manufacturing peaked at about 30% of our workforce over 50 years ago and has been declining ever since, and with GOOD REASON. As economies mature, they naturally move from manufacturing to services-- technology has only accelerating this shift.