From Minnesota Public Radio News Toxic Traces Revisited:
In 2005, Minnesota Public Radio first raised questions about whether the state of Minnesota acted quickly enough to investigate contamination from 3M chemicals. Two years later a new 3M chemical has been found in drinking water, affecting more communities, and the state's response is again being questioned.
Viewing this timeline, it is easy to understand why residents wondered what took so long. ( See The Health Department delayed disclosure for more background information. )
Whether you're a resident of St. Paul's east metro or another area that has been affected by water contamination, where do you begin?
Have you or your community been affected by perfluorochemicals? How would you recommend addressing such environmental impacts?
How would you address the Health Department and the company involved?
________________
Julia Schrenkler
Minnesota Public Radio Interactive Producer
See the initial report in the MPR News Archive: Toxic Traces
rate
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 2