Congressman and presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich was one of the few Democrats to vote against the supplemental spending bill that passed by the House yesterday. The House bill provided $100 billion in new spending on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. But the bill also contained a binding provision calling for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq by Septemer, 2008.
Kucinich and other progressive Democrats voted against the bill and called for the immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq. Kucinich has voted against funding for the war every time the issue has appeared before Congress. He is also the only presidential candidate who voted against the bill authorizing the use of force against Iraq in 2002 (Barack Obama opposed the war from the start, but was not serving in the U.S. Senate at the time).
Kucinich had this to say about yesterday's vote in the House (or view the video of his comments):
"Congress has just voted to give President Bush the money he needs to keep the war going through the end of his term.
So where do we go from here? Well, this is the moment that all of us must come together, in communities across the United States, to insist that our nation take a new direction -- now -- in Iraq.
We must go into the town squares. We must meet in libraries, and on university campuses across the country, to cause the policies of the United States to merge from right from the grassroots, and be heard in Washington.
Unfortunately Washington has not listened. Washington has said More War.
You're the ones who must stand for peace. And join with me in this effort to just Change America.
It's not satisfactory that Congress has voted to keep the war going.
Congress had the power to end this war.
And you and I know that.
And now we have to forge a whole new relationship with the American people leading the way, not waiting for Congress to act.
We must act. And we must act from our streets, we must act from our neighborhoods, we must act from our town halls. And it's the power of the people now that's going to have to transform the American government.
It's a sad day when Washington, having recognized that we're standing on a mountain of lies, and proceeding to prosecute a war against a people that did not attack us.
It's a sad day when America will know that there will be more troop casualties and more civilian casualties, and a greater drain on our resources, when we need money for education, health care, and so many other things in this country.
Where do we go from here? We go to where America has always gone, and that is the strength of a powerful civic response. And you must be part of that.
I join with you, as I have never wavered in my efforts for peace, in my determination to point out that war is not the way, in my insistence that this is the time that we have to take a new direction.
Just know that there are those of us who continue to take that stand in Washington.
But now you need to take a stand.
So please, join, together, all over the country.
And I'll be there with you.
Thank you very much."


Comments: 22
Laurie - Are you opposed to the bill for a particular reason?
I have not been a supporter of Kucinich, but he is clearly right on this subject.
It will not be more than a few years before people begin to complain that other would-be leaders were not willing to take a stand about this disastrous misadventure in Iraq.
I think we need to be smart about how we withdraw but I also think we need to develop a plan to get out asap. Waiting until 2008 seems like a long time to me. We need to hand over more of the power to the Iraqi police and troops.
Michael - you mention Kucinich's appearance as a reason people will not support him. I would tend to look at the presidential candidates from 2004 and think the opposite. Here you had John Kerry, who looks like a dying tree, and George W. Bush, who has the appearance of a monkey, vying for the White House. Perhaps looks are not as important as we tend to think!
Dennis is taking a principled view and that is great but sometimes, often actually, the view that will prevail and therefore be meaningful is the pragmatic view. We all know this bill is dead in the water if it should get through the Senate! And I see no way to get a majority sufficient to override the president's veto.
This brings us back to the fine practice and high art of "sending messages." Messages sent seldom last as long as the smoke rings from a good cigar!
Thanks for the article!
Michael M,
That is quite a colorful design of imagery you just produced!
Just FYI -- CSPAN Hotline reporting current Zogby Poll, this date:
Hillary 32%
Obama 22%
Edwards 13%
In Iowa: Edwards is neck and neck with Hillary, Obama down 7 points.
Btw, saw via CSPAN, Kucinich and his wife in New Hampshire. She, like Elizabeth Edwards is very strong and a very staunch and effective activist on international issues. They talked, amongst other things, about their experience in South Lebanon [they had difficulty getting travel visas] to investigate Israel's use of U.S.A. made cluster bombs.
And, on the latter subject, I got my first flag today -- on my article "Politics of War and Theater."