"Accede gracefully to the inevitable." This is my motto. It is expressed at greater length in the Serenity Prayer:
God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;
courage to change the things I can;
and wisdom to know the difference.
But as a writer and editor I prefer my more succinct version. And as a writer and editor I also know that if my phrase hasn't been stolen yet (and assuming I didn't accidentally steal it myself) it will eventually be used without crediting me. It’s inevitable.
I recently received an email from a friend, let's call him Joe, -- a tremendously talented writer and photographer with a blog -- who had a reader ask if she could reproduce some of Joe's photos to hang on the wall. My friend's initial reaction was to say "No."
I understand my friend's reaction. For the past 15 years I've made all or a significant part of my income from my literary efforts or those of the writers I've paid. Let's be clear. I've said this before, here on Gather, but apparently I can’t say it often enough: Those who create things from their minds -- whether stories, recipes, photographs, or, even, puns -- are entitled to recompense for their work.
If you're copying and posting someone else's intellectual creations without permission or attribution you are a slime ball. Period.
But this isn't for you. This is for those, like me, who devote a lot of time, effort, and brain cells to creating something new:
Whatever you post online is going to be used. There's absolutely nothing you can do about it. If your last name is Gates and your daddy's first name is Bill then there's still nothing you can do about it. The record industry is prosecuting kids for illegal downloads and the movie industry is shooting itself in the foot to prevent such downloads -- and they still happen. Your daddy (Bill, remember?, a brilliant man) is helping them and it's still not successful.
I'm sorry. But if you want iron-clad protection for your intellectual property then the only solution is to never share it -- which makes its economic value nil, but it's your choice.
So I told my friend, "Accede gracefully to the inevitable." The person who wrote Joe asked for permission to use the photos in their own house. They didn’t have to ask -- Joe would never have known if they hadn't. They can still use the photos and he'd never know if they do. And if he tells them no he runs the risk of pissing them off without accomplishing anything.
So, by saying "no" he accomplishes nothing positive and may produce something negative. By saying "yes" he accomplishes something positive (good will) and produces nothing negative.
Joe, you can't stop them, so be generous and gain a reputation for generosity. Ideas can't be owned and even the uniqueness of their expression is subject to argument. Argue only when you have something obvious to gain.
And for those of you planning on claiming Joe's work (or mine, or anyone else's) as your own whether explicitly or implicitly, you’re garbage. In fact, you're a somnolent mediocrity driveling on your own chin during those brief periods when you wake up enough to fire more than ten of your synapses at once. It doesn't matter if we can stop you or not, you're still pig intestines -- shitlins.(Typo intended, Copyright, Kevin D. Weeks, all rights reserved, if you use it, I want credit, if you make money, I will demand a cut)


Comments: 21
AMEN!
I rather like "shitlins" -- which is sure to be stolen.
Donna & Sonia,
I've got a long essay on this topic that I need to write. But it's a complex subject and it's difficult to articulate my extrinsic an intrinsic interests fairly.
I'm working on trying to illustrate a song my friend Johnsmith wrote, so I asked him if I could use his lyrics here. He's tickled at the idea and asked me to send him a link when I get it finished. I wouldn't have dreamed o doing it without John's blessing.
Yeah. Rights to your copy are equal mixtures of law and alchemy. It's a strange subject.
Donna,
Nope, but I'll pick it up. And you should get a copy of "If You Find an Adjective: Kill It." You will adore the book.
You really will adore it. It's even more fun than, "Eats, Shoots and Leaves." Alas, I'm not weird enough to write a non-fiction bestseller.
Well done. Plagiarizers scum, be nice to people who ask instead of take.
And Kevin, I love "shitlins". Can I borrow it? (Running away...)
I'll have to look that little plagiarism book up! The Eats, Shoots & Leaves is another new to me......must also look that one up!
Tonia, I'm using one of Jessie's images for my wallpaper.....I asked and seh was gracious enough to say I could.....the one of apples in crates...........I love it!
Donna, you should copy the little book of plagiarism in its entirety to Gather! ;-)
Actually I stole this whole article from you during one of your blackouts.
Wendy,
Absolutely.
Sonia,
They're both excellent.
Danielle,
I'll have to order a copy.
I'm assuming that the inquiry came from someone who wants to honor Joe's wishes, or why bother asking? And in public, no less, so it's "on the record." I also notice that the person did not ask "can I buy your photos somewhere and if not, may I use them..." they just want to use them for free. So if Joe answers, again in public, and accedes gracefully to this particular theft, then what is to stop the next 1000 people who want to use an image of Joe's from just lifting it secure in their assessment that it's okay with Joe?
One could turn the logic around and say that unless they wanted Joe's honest answer and plan on honoring that answer the person who asked is running the risk of pissing Joe off without accomplishing anything. (theft + taunting=pissed Joe) Why would you want to bother being generous with such a person?
I don't think that graceful accession to theft is any different from graceful accession to other forms of abusive behavior. (insert inflammatory comment about women gracefully acceding to rape) Theft is theft and asking first really doesn't change that equation.
The person who wrote asking for permission should be given an honest answer and if that answer is NO (because Joe is planning on selling the photos, or just doesn't want his photos used that way, or even just by that person) then so be it. The person may still steal the picture but it will be clear to everyone that it is being stolen.
Shitlins indeed.
On my personalized Google Home Page this morning:
Quotes of the Day:
About the most originality that any writer can hope to achieve honestly is to steal with good judgment.
- Josh Billings