A SECULARIST PERSPECTIVE
Among anomalous phenomena attracting wide spread attention such as UFOs, synchronicities, and alien abductions is that of near death experiences. Reports of near death experiences [ndes] have been gathered from all over the world bearing striking similarities with respect to their experienced content.
To be classified as a near death experience, a person has to have been observed to have apparently died. A common experience of death is the medical professional observing a dying patient on an operating table "flat lining" indicating that his heart has stopped pumping. Although official death is expected to follow, people experiencing an NDE somehow regain their ability to breathe and amazingly return to the land of the living.
Many who live to tell their remarkable tales describe a wondrous process that takes place in a relatively few seconds of consciousness that continues on after the heart has stopped breathing. Furthermore, anecdotes of this process are remarkably similar among all groups of people experiencing NDEs.
Among the common characteristics of NDEs are: an experience of being rushed through a long tunnel, sighting an atmospheric white light, meeting up with the presence of a familiar person who has died apparently functioning in the role of greeting the newly "dead" person, and an over arching experience of at-one-ment in which the newly "dead" person feels unconditionally accepted - bathed in a sea of love - so to speak. At this point, NDEs typically describe being given the choice to literally die or return to life. If they wish to return to life they are given a simple formula - breathe. Choosing to live once more - breathing once again - they appear to 'rise from the dead."
NDEs also speak of having out of body experiences in which they report hovering above let's say an operation performed on them. They often report fine details such as what the medical staff was wearing and what was said between and among them.
What should we make of such extraordinary experiences?
Clearly there are many who offer a religious or spiritual interpretation. For them the end of the "tunnel" is heaven and the greeter is an angel. The choice to return to life is presumably due to the "grace" of God and the like. While this spiritual explanation is seductive, I am inclined to view these remarkable occurrences from a mundane and naturalistic perspective. How so? Allow me to free associate.
My first association in hearing NDEs report their similar experiences of near death is that of Freud's concept of the life and death instinct. [Among the three major issues that Freud is castigated for perhaps the chief one is the concept of the life and death instincts.] For Freud conflict is at the core of human experience both individually and collectively. And the core conflict is between the life long war between the will to live and the will to die.
Life can accurately be viewed as a never ending succession of problems. Some greet their problems with a creative attitude of bring them on. Such people feel they have been dealt a deck of cards and whether their hand is favorable or not they are prepared to play it the best they can.
Others feel beaten down, ravaged by the unfairness of life's inevitable never ending struggles, put upon, eternally frustrated, and dispirited. Such people find it difficult to get out of bed each morning to attend to even the simplest of chores.
Most of us have experienced both extremes of this continuum experiencing good days and bad days, good periods of time and bad periods of time. When the balance of bad times grows too large and to weighty swamping and overwhelming the good times it is not uncommon to wish to throw in the chips so to speak and sink into an eternal sleep.
Freud would add one more ingredient into this psychodynamic stew. This ingredient is that this civil war in the non stop battle ground between the life instinct and the death instinct largely happens below the level of consciousness in the unconscious. THis means that most are unaware that such a titanic battle rages in each of us.
Such a formulation may help to explain how other wise healthy men often drop permanently dead from a heart attack that appears not to be life threatening; whereas a little old grandmother of 95 suffering from multiple debilitating ailments lives on because she absolutely must see her great granddaughter graduate from college and the like.
Now to near death experiences and Freud.
In addition to the concepts of the life and the death instincts, Freud - ever fond of inventing and or utilizing organizing concepts for ordering psychological chaos - refers to regression in the service of the ego. This concept implies that under certain psychological conditions the psyche of a given individual may regress - literally go backwards - descending through layers of stages of psychological development for the purpose of correcting a core conflict. THe first stage of developmental conflict is in that of the new born. This is the primary stage of being where one receives or fails to receive the necessary nuturance conducive to formulating or failing to formulate a solid identity. The key ingredient necessary for the formulation of a solid self - strong identity - is experiencing unconditional love.
Utilizing the concepts of the normal civil war between the life and the death instinct with regression in the service of the ego - I hypothesize that the NDE may be naturallistically explained in the following manner. NDEs may be those people who have never consciously chosen to take a clear cut position with respect to living or dying. But once once faced with the ultimate choice of continuing to be versus blowing out the candle of their existence - choose to opt for life. This opting for life is no simple affirmation of life itself but is instead a willingness to struggle with life's inevitable struggles. This means that such people accept all that reality presents: its pleasures and its pains; its victories and its defeats; it triumphs and its failures.
In this view - at the 'zero" point of near death - there is a heightened sensitivity to ones ordinary experience in extraordinary ways all of which are focused on the core of ones being in which one is forced to take a position with respect to the deepest of humanely deep questions: that is: to live or to die.
When one fully accepts and embraces and tolerates the total YIng and Yang of their personal and collective experience the result is feeling peace of mind. This experience of peace of mind is, I believe, parallel to the often described experience of unconditional acceptance - the most impactful part of the process described by most NDEs.
In this view, the near death experience is a process initiated by a person facing their actual death in which they opt probably for the first time in their lives to willingly continue to play out their cards until their deck runs out or they choose to fold.


Comments: 16
I drowned when I was about 18 months old. I toddled out into lake michigan after my mother while my grandfather was supposed to be watching me. My mom saw me face down and revived me. I am not sure f I was technically "dead" and I donlt remember any of it due to my young age, so I have no clue if I had a NDE. But I can tell you this. There is something after this life. I am not religious so I don't think it is "Heaven" or "God." But I have had clear cut run ins with ghosts...so far as one actually saved my life when I was a baby...A blanket was wrapped around my head, smothering me. (I am starting to a see a pattern here)
Any-hoo we are amazing creatures and this world is amazing just for existing... there must be something more to look forward to...the alternative is unthinkable.
Not at all. That is what I have believed all seventy years of my life.
Ghosts, spirituality and the concept of the immortal soul are all natural reactions to the fear of the alternative...the Great Sleep of Nothingness.
If this is true then why do these feelings of peace of mind and unconditional acceptance not remain with an individual the remainder of their life after the NDE?
Also, you have to separate the mythology about this from the reality. Stress has been placed on those pleasant NDEs to the exclusion of the unpleasant ones, in which the person, brought up on the idea of sin, hell, and eternal damnation visualizes exactly that. I'm willing to bet that these are as common, or maybe more common, than the pleasant ones.
Have you read 90 MINUTES IN HEAVEN by Don Piper? Unique in almost all aspects compared to the more "common" NDE.
The tunnel, entering into bright light, a place of loving expectation, all characteristic of the birth event and blended to this new traumatic and dramatic event of being on the brink of death. All the anexity, hopes, wishes coming into play as life at a possible end is faced.
Angels, god, heaven, hell, devils, etc are all metaphors and symbols the mind conjurs up to deal with the two events now being compared and blended.
Out of body experiences as a result of the NDE could also be the distance of consciousness trying to preserve itself while awareness of death is over taking the physiology of the body - the mind flees from the trauma as it often does when faced with overwhelming truma - it disassociates.
Just my own mussing on the topic.
Having had my own unique experience about 14 years ago now, I came out of it with a profound awareness of the spiritual realm of unconditional love. Due to that amazing experience and it's subsequent nonstop reading and other research to fully understand, I know without any doubt what it amounts to me. That also fit's with what many other 'experiencers' have gotten out of it all. A spiritual experience usually unknown and unsuspected prior to the event.
My experience was not at all considered anything close to being a near death experience other than the similarity of most of the sensations considered the most important.
So like Freud did, it can all be looked at 'objectively' as most scientists would consider doing in keeping it all on a scientific level of discussion. Making it all factors associated with Freud's concepts of ego, id, super-ego and whatnot.
Having read enough of that to begin to understand some of it, I then read of Jung who was Freud's disciple student before developing his own far more subjective theories about all such. It is Jung that I can better relate to in all of this due to his allowance of the subjectivity that dominates any truly spiritual experience.