Originally posted here.
China about to pass U.S. as world's top generator of greenhouse gases
ar more than previously acknowledged, the battle against global warming will be won or lost in China, even more so than in the West, new data show.
A report released last week by Beijing authorities indicated that as its economy continues to expand at a red-hot pace, China is highly likely to overtake the United States this year or in 2008 as the world's largest emitter of greenhouse gases.
This information, along with data from the International Energy Agency, the Paris-based alliance of oil importing nations, also revealed that China's greenhouse gas emissions have recently been growing by a total amount much greater than that of all industrialized nations put together.
"The magnitude of what's happening in China threatens to wipe out what's happening internationally," said David Fridley, leader of the China Energy Group at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
"Today's global warming problem has been caused mainly by us in the West, with the cumulative (carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases) in the atmosphere, but China is contributing to the global warming problem of tomorrow."
New statistics released in Beijing on Wednesday by China's National Bureau of Statistics show that China's consumption of fossil fuels rose in 2006 by 9.3 percent, about the same rate as in previous years -- and about eight times higher than the U.S. increase of 1.2 percent.
While China's total greenhouse gas emissions were only 42 percent of the U.S. level in 2001, they had soared to an estimated 97 percent of the American level by 2006.
"The new data are not encouraging," said Yang Fuqiang, China director for the Energy Foundation, a San Francisco organization that works extensively with Lawrence Berkeley scientists and the Chinese government on energy-saving programs. "China will overtake the United States much faster than expected as the No. 1 emitter."
China's top environmental official admitted Wednesday that the results show the government's environment agenda of the past few years has been ineffective.
"Economic growth is still excessive ... and there is slow progress in restructuring obsolete and backward production capacity," said Zhou Shengxian, director of the State Environmental Protection Agency.
"The new data show that many local officials are more concerned about economic development, about increasing gross domestic product, and see energy efficiency and environmental protection as a lower priority," said Yang, of the Energy Foundation.
In an attempt to force local governments to obey energy-efficiency edicts from Beijing, the government recently announced that local officials' pay and promotion will be judged in part based on their environmental record, not just their economic success. The first evaluation period will be in July.
China's emergence as a global warming polluter has been intensely controversial in international negotiations over climate change.
The Bush administration refused to join the Kyoto Protocol in part because the pact committed only industrialized nations, but not fast-growing poorer nations like China, to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases.
Chinese officials, however, note that the country's per capita emissions are far below those in the West, and they say any move to adopt mandatory cuts now would restrain its economic growth and in effect penalize its 1.3 billion people for being poor. The officials say China must be given the chance to attain the West's standard of prosperity before it will cut emissions.
"It must be pointed out that climate change has been caused by the long-term historic emissions of developed countries and their high per-capita emissions," China's Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Jiang Yu, said last month.
"Developed countries bear an unshirkable responsibility," she said, adding that they should "lead the way in assuming responsibility for emissions cuts."
International negotiations have begun over a successor pact to the Kyoto Protocol, and industrial nations -- and most environmentalists -- are insisting that big developing nations such as China, India and Brazil commit to reductions.
China's hard line may finally be softening, however.
The Chinese government recently admitted that global warming will dramatically impact China's ability to feed its people. A government report released in January said that climate change will cause China's production of wheat, corn and rice to drop by as much as 37 percent over the next 50 years.
Precipitation over the country's northern grainbelt is expected to drop markedly, causing worsened droughts and dust storms, while increased flooding and typhoons are expected in the subtropical south, the report said.
What China needs, many experts say, is help from the United States and other Western nations to help adopt energy-saving technologies. China's energy consumption per unit of production is 40 percent higher than the world's average, and about 70 percent of its energy comes from coal, usually burned in highly inefficient power plants.
The U.S. Energy Department carries out some technical cooperation with China on issues such as coal, but most forms of U.S. assistance to China have been barred under sanctions imposed by Congress after the 1989 Tiananmen killings in Beijing.
Although Chinese officials say their country should receive foreign grants and subsidies, the Central Bank has the world's highest foreign-exchange reserves, at $1.1 trillion, so most experts say China needs training and technology rather than cash.
China has much to learn from California, said Barbara Finamore, director of the China program of the Natural Resources Defense Council.
The state's Energy Commission and Public Utilities Commission have exchanged information with their counterparts in China in recent years, but Finamore said much more is needed to help spread California's energy-efficient ways.
"This is what China is missing," Finamore said, referring to the state's complex mix of efficiency standards for buildings, appliances and industry. "We have no national energy-efficiency program, but 20 U.S. states use them, and China is on the brink of using them."


Comments: 9
It's politics as usual... with the left leading the charge to weaken America.
http://untreaty.un.org/ENGLISH/bible/englishinternetbible/partI/chapterXXVII/treaty32.asp
If the old Commissars of the USSR were trying to find a way of screwing the US, they couldn't do better than this.
Scientists don't yet know how much is being released into the air from this, because it is such a new phenomenon, but the gas is 20 times as potent as a greenhouse gas than CO2 is, and there is great concern that we've reached a point of no return, where there will be more greenhouse gases pumped into the atmosphere each year, because of the positive feedback that is overwhelming the earth's ability to absorb carbon, and feeding into the problem, making it far worse.
I wish the "right" would stop standing in the way of progress, so that the United States could become the world leader in alternative energy technologies. Imagine being able to offset our massive trade deficit with China by exporting something that the world wants, for a change.
China would jump at the chance to replace fossil fuel consumption, if something viable were presented to them. Bejing has become a national embarrassment for them, because of the putrid, choking pollution in the air.
The question is, why don't we? I thought America was the technological leader of the world. Why are we waiting around for other nations to do the inevitable? Whatever happened to American ingenuity and desire to be the best? When did we become a nation of followers?
They know what lefties do not (or more accurately want us to do) - we'll have to sacrifice our hegemony and spot in the world to reduce emissions, reducing ourselves to Europe's level.
The global warming argument is simply a way to beat up the United States in an effort to tear us down. They've always resented that we're a superpower so they've contrived this argument, taking advantage of natural warming, to blame the US.
Quite simply, this is not about global warming and never has been.
It's about beating up the United States and making people feel guilty for being successful.
So, this is ample reason for the United States to be a follower rather than a leader, with regard to alternative energy sources?
"we'll have to sacrifice our hegemony and spot in the world to reduce emissions"
Actually, becoming the world's leader on something once again would secure our place as a world leader, not diminish it. Following some other nation's technology and advancement is what will sacrifice our hegemony. While we continue to bury our heads in the sand and ignore the unavoidable, other nations are scurrying to develop the world's next era. What a shame that those on the "right" are once again firmly planted on the exact wrong side of yet another issue, for all the wrong reasons, once again.
"The global warming argument is simply a way to beat up the United States in an effort to tear us down. "
This is stupid. I'm sorry, but this makes absolutely no sense. We're tearing ourselves down, with things like refusing to accept reality on global warming and the finite nature of oil, and the Iraq war debacle, for starters.
While you and your ideology is busy inventing enemies over this issue, the rest of the world is racing to blow us away.
"Quite simply, this is not about global warming and never has been."
Right. As usual, the "right" offers a simplistic opinion based on nothing but a simplistic opinion.
Feel free to ignore the science. Feel free to ignore that global warming is real and is a real threat to the world. Continue to politicize what is a human issue, not a partisan one.
Now, explain to me why you are so strongly opposed to the US being a leader with regard to alternative energy technology? Why do you insist upon seeing the US lag behind and get crushed by the rest of the world? If you TRULY wanted the US to be a world leader, you would be fully in support of new energy sources being produced. Instead, you wish to see this country continue to cling to an industry with no future, while the rest of the world soars past us.
The only thing simplistic is accepting the argument that humans (i.e., Americans) are causing global warming because a handful of scientists who feed at the government trough and 2,200 politicians sign off on the UN and IPCC report.
That's why more and more people are turning skeptical and seeing the argument for what it is - a way to tear down America.
Does anyone truly believe Europe or China or India wouldn't be thrilled with a weakened America?
Oh, I'm a strong believer in alternative energy and encourage free-market improvements and alternatives. You'll find no stronger supporter than me. I'm reminded of that every time I fill up my SUV.
But I'm not going to sacrifice my way and quality of life on an unproven theory so others can feel good about themselves.
So bring on the ethanol, nuclear power plants, clean coal, and other forms of energy.