Sexuality Informs Intelligence/Conscience/Love

Sexuality provides the emmissive and receptive polarities that cause communication to happen. Sexuality is about the dialog of love, about mutuality, self-giving and personal fulfillment. Communication is about intelligence and mutual exchange. Reflection and the exchange of knowledge inform intelligence, and intelligence informs moral consciousness—conscience—the agency of love.

Female/male polarity, emotion and reason, generates the intelligence strands of reflection and exchange. Mutuality (other-concern) is informed in the experience of sexuality; conscience (the obligation of covenant) is informed in the experience of intentional mutuality. Sexuality is the basis of mutual advancement, of emotional/rational intelligence and of conscience. Conscience intends the sustainability of emotional/rational intelligence, that is, the mutuality of sensitivity and mindfulness.

The set up of quantum-electric polarity occurred with and from the first big bang release and expansion of charged potentials. Gravitational liberation from compressed density allowed the expansion and separation of force-differentials as well as the eventual combinations and mixings that could/would occur in divergent, convergent and emergent potentials. The distinctions and divisions of positive-negative (electrically charged) energy and of quantum-electric potential (divergence, convergence and emergence) are resourced in cosmic expansion.

Quantum-electric liaisons in the human body at any time are supernumerary; even now, the many qualifications of sexual differences are specifically analogies of electro-magnetic energy, which amplifies universal potentials of purposeful creativity. Self-reflective intelligence is both the expression of dialogic potential and the product of quantum-electric polarity.

The “universal analog” of electromagnetic relativity advances the sexual complex. The differentiation of the female/male persona occurs in the ongoing iterations of the “universal analog”. The growth of personal potential advances in complexity and finds expression in individual qualification, that is, in the uniqueness of sexual expression, physical and psychical.

The cosmically ordered intelligent design of sexuality/mutuality opens consciousness to sensitivity and mindfulness, by which the “gendered persona” amplifies potentials of intelligence. Emotion and reason are mutually sustaining; the failed mutuality of reason and emotion violates humanity and opens to all manner of personal/social violence.

In every human body, whether female or male, individuality is quantum-electrically differentiated and sustained. The specific sexual character of the individual is script in the genetic codes contained in original parental gametes (egg and sperm). One-half of one’s chromosomes come in the egg and one-half come in the sperm, both by the cell-division processes of meiosis. Genetic mixing characterizes the gendered persona, in whose body the original genetic characterization is faithfully sustained by cell division (mitosis). For one’s lifetime, each cell of the body carries within it the unique genetic coding of the original fertilized egg. In a real sense we are replications not only of parents but of all life that precedes us.

Developmental potentials of personal intelligence are mixed distinctions of emotional / rational intelligence acquired from parental genetic disposition (nature) and from the psychological conditioning in family in the course of upbringing (nurture). Except for the openness of genetic mixing and family socializing, the potentials of human intelligence stagnate and frustrate creativity. The hyper-culture of dominion theology is a dark cloud of frustration, stagnation and fixation over families and communities.

Female/male sexual characterization sometimes manifests in unambiguous distinctions and sometimes manifests in ambiguous distinctions, whether in the female or male persona. The sexual attraction of one person for another manifests in a variety of ways. In early embryonic stages there is no distinction of sex. Even in childhood years sexual distinctions are not greatly pronounced until the onset of puberty and the production of sex-specific hormones. Psychological factors of peer relationships and of parental persuasion affect one’s gendered psychology and ultimately one’s sexual disposition.

The orientation (“ordering”) of the gendered persona reveals personal psychological proclivities, whether toward persons of the same sex or the other sex. Proclivities are socializing phenomena. The effective functioning of the family, its quality of function and/or dysfunction, has great impact on children before, during and after adolescence in the acquisition of sexual characterization / behavior. Sexual ordering and orientation isn’t the same in every person. Quite otherwise, the individual sexual persona is “anomalous” because of the wide variations that occur. Prejudging individuals based on “deviations” from some norm or other isn’t purposeful, sensitive, or rational because persons vary for reasons of nature and nurture. Every person deserves to be respected and accepted at face value. The fact of the matter is that when it comes to the physical/psychical disposition of sexuality there is no absolute; every person is “humanly” characterized in person in the same way, namely, in the broad range of parent-received female/male characteristics.

The relativity of individual sexual characterization qualifies behavioral proclivity and the preferred comfort zones of socialization. Finding a purposeful role in life comes more easily for some than for others. And so does successful socialization. The organization of communities and communal harmony depends on social mores and support systems that enable individuals to be socialized in relationships that make them positive agents of common wellbeing.

The arrangements of socializing can vary widely. But there have to prevail arrangements that secure personal and social wellbeing no matter personal proclivity. Groupings, for specific purposes of personal, social collaboration, can be large and small, in twos and threes, and more. Gender need not be the qualifying denominator; interests and objectives should be. There are all-male and all-female communities centered on good works of common good and spiritual wellbeing. The kinds of social needs are large and small, and they come localized, regionalized and globalized.

Religions need to take the lead in openness to gender differences and to the personal self-worth of everyone regardless of differences. The use of an absolute measure to disqualify people from religious community, based on sexual litmus-testing, calls into question the authenticity of such religion. Arbitrary and unjustified discrimination always damages the individual and the community.

Social conscience fails when personal conscience fails; personal conscience fails when social conscience fails. Personal conscience and social conscience depend mutually on each other as end and means. The failure of personal/social sensitivity and mindfulness is a failure of mutuality and of conscience. Truth and reconciliation, the bases of social harmony, of love, are matters of sensitivity, mindfulness, mutuality and conscience. Social harmony happens inside the intentional accommodation of gendered difference.