Dear Gather,
I joined this website thinking that it would be a great place to meet like-minded people, share ideas and read some good articles. I have been online long enough to know that there always has been, and always will be, childish morons who have way too much time on their hands and not enough brains to fill a thimble. I am just about fed up with the drive by low ratings on good articles, flame wars that erupt over 'he said, she said' stuff, and the lack of policing by the Gather staff. We have hinted, whined, and begged, and there hasn't been any change or much feedback from you.
I have really appreciated the many times my articles have been featured on Gather, truly. I am not thinking of leaving (yet), but something has to be done about the flamers. You have a good site here, with the potential to be a really great site, but as with our nation, your success rides on the participation of the many 'common people', not just the "stars" that you have as guest writers.
If you are getting complaints about particular people, can't you just investigate it, and if you find they are abusing their membership on Gather then bar them from the site??


Comments: 33
nice people here. I don't care about ratings. I just like to know that my work gets
read. There are a lot of great stories and poetry here too. I enjoy reading the work
of others also. Hang in there . I think this is a great site.
But, I just get 2-3 comments, if i am lucky, the most i ever got was 12, but, I enjoy writing down my thoughts and sharing them with like-minded people. I also enjoy reading other people's articles and i love to comment on the one's that interest me.
Maybe, i'm too serious, maybe i have to lighten up a bit and ask "how many people do you know with names that start with the letter "X". Then I will get over 40 comments, at least!
( now, if you can't sleep at night, and don't mind tales with a twist, please feel free to check it out, ta)
I enjoy the people I've come to know here . . . and I ignore content I don't like, rather than kicking up a fuss about it. But the fact that there are people on the site who would like to have a controlling opinon regarding with whom I may "correctly" associate, and the fact that those people do not have the balls to contact me or email me directly to tell me this, but flag my article for no reason instead . . . it reeks of high school, and you know, Ducklet, how I felt about high school. It's arguable that the drama isn't affecting me personally, but I'm not sure I want to stay in a community where it is allowed to proliferate.
I am not a coward though, and I will stay because I like so many of the people here. We can make this a good place to be, just by being the good people we are. Yes, I know, that was poor sentence structure. ;-)
I think they are working on some kind of channel structure; I know I wrote into one of Tom's "talk with the CEO " things and afterwards got an answer sent to me about that. Didn't give a time frame or details though. I do think it would help a lot.
I just enjoy writing, it makes me feel good to let out feelings that I have held in me for years. I enjoy speaking out...being a bit shy, gather has provided me with an excellent outlet for my feelings. Yes, Nancy this is a kind of therapy, a very good one.
Seeing that other people have the same feelings about the amount of comments on their articles, I feel better, I thought I was the only one.
That's the beauty of this site. I have met so many nice people here. It's good to know that there are really nice people out there all over the world. So let us keep on writing and discovering each other.
They have stated they would start kicking accounts that do that, but I have not seen any evidence of enforcement at all.
I think we can divide the problem into three major questions. The first question is how to improve the quality of the comments to posts. There have been various proposals for article writer moderation and all have advantages and disadvantages. The problem that I see is that lousy comments are rewarded the same as insightful comments. For those who love points; quantity not quality is the key. You almost need a system to "rate" the comments, or at least allow people to reward the good ones over the bad ones.
The second question is how to improve the quality of the good articles. That answer is easy; get more people to write good articles! Even in groups I have joined I frequently find that there are periods where few good articles are published in them. It's really not a matter of poor articles; one can easily skip over them; but it is a matter of getting enough good content to encourage more good content.
Finally there is the problem of organizing Gather so that all the good content shines above the mediocre content or even the poor content. I don't know if there really is a good idea for how to do that. Organizations and subdivisions can help.
I have haters. They know who they are. They write about people naming them. It is no secret. But it is no sweat off my back. If their picking on me they are leaving someone else alone.
I have Faith one day they will get these things fixed so the drive by and popularity contest stops.
"Can't we all just get along? "
Rodney King
I don't mind any kind of posts on Gather. The reason that I joined Gather was that there seemed to be something for everyone. I admit that I do post recipes, and the last few days, I've posted quite a few games. But I've also written serious articles about many different topics. For me, it just depends on the mood that I'm in on that particular day.