Are you concerned that (within recorded history) Lake Superior is at an all-time low water level? We can easily understand how that affects the ore freighters and other boats, but how does this affect the average citizen?
According to the Minnesota Public Radio article  Low level of Lake Superior raises concern and costs:
The lake is a victim of the weather, and the weather has been warm and dry. The Duluth region is officially in extreme drought. As of late December, Duluth's rainfall is seven inches below normal for the year.
I can only begin to imagine the impact this has on the systems that depend on Lake Superior. Can we make sense of how something this big and seemingly unrelated to our daily lives is actually affects us?
______________________
Julia Schrenkler
Minnesota Public Radio Interactive Producer




Comments: 17
Yes, it will cause economic trouble to the shippers and the people providing the goods to be shipped.
Great Lakes Water Level Data for the Duluth station via the NOAA
and
Long Term Average Min-Max Water Levels from the Army Corps of Engineers. You're right - it was low in the mid-1920s.
Pretty interesting stuff. It is understandable why the shipping industry is crossing its fingers for a short-term turnaround. If they can regain the rain (being 7 inches short this year hasn't been the greatest for the lake level) it might happen.
We're close to the end of the month, - "While the lake stands at an all-time low level, the record won't be set until record keepers calculate a low average level at the end of the month."
Reforestation NOW - particularly in areas of factory-soil toxicity and DU radiation dust-prone areas. Time to get cookin' on toxic area/air healings.
The low water level may be good for my basement, but, yes Beryl, rocks are appearing all over the place, and Lake Superior's drainage area is very limited. We must turn this global warming around, and very soon!
We will be kayaking to Bayfield tomorrow, to accompany a friend who is, yes, swimming from Madline to Bayfield. The water is, of course, cold (but it should be frozen). Let us work for change in 2007.
The United Nations, not my favorite institution, maybe yours, came out with study a few weeks ago that the earth's water levels increased 7" in the last century, not 2' as Al Gore stated in his movie. Kinda a big difference, huh?
Global warming is happening. There will be benefits as well as problems to this change. Look to the global economic properity of the 1300's.
The political left is using global warming to scare people into accepting more socialism, especially trying tp push more socialism on the United States.
There's a start.
Why would Al Gore inflate the numbers? That's what I mean by "Hysteria". Lots of loose "facts" or people accepting Al Gore's word as "fact".
Global warming is happening. I believe so. Then why has most of the temperature rise happened before 1940? The 1300's were a time when the grew good grapes in England because of the increase in temperature. The world prospered because of the warmer temperatures and the ability to provide food. It lasted for a few hundred years, then it cooled off.
Because if people were so concerned about the environment they would have made the Kyoto Protocal to include China,India, and Indonesia, the nations that have the most "dirty" manufacturing and the largest growing heavy industrial base. China is one the most unregulated and poluting countries, why aren't we concerned over China?
Left leaning people want to saddle the United State's economy and bring it in line with Europe and Global warming is there tool. They've come to their own conculusion that there is a "concensous" and want a political tool to further their ways. Left leaning people hate it when you try to argue the global warming debate. The left uses one of the favorite tactics in trying to "shout down" any conflicting views.