Kindly go through my official site for details about my expertise and achievements - http://kalpeshsharma.page.tl
About Wikipedia Administrators
This article is a copy of matter posted by one of my group member on wikipedia because whether or not good, if any one edits ankit fadia's article on wikipedia these adminsitrators do not allow them to do so. Wikipedia administrators are not the employees of wikipedia group in any way they are instead simple persons like all of us working on internet. They have been provided rights of administration for modification of contents on wikipedia to make it more better. Not one or two or three but many peoples edited ankit fadia's contents, but the administrators are relatives of ankit fadia who do not want any one to modify anything about ankit fadia. I am daily recieving many emails of my members and peoples who are in touch with me. Other then this some of wikipedia administrators are going falling to such a useless level that even if any one who does not have relation with me, and if he/she edits ankit fadia's page the wikipedia administrators say it's kalpesh sharma itself. And that I am doing so because my publicity is less then ankit fadia.
According to utcarsch, a wikipedia administrator if any one edits any page of ankit fadia it's because the editing person's publicity is less. If such is the case then according to him no one should edit ankit fadia's page and let him cheat and earn money by self claiming himself the world's biggest hacking expert, world's biggest cia officer, world's biggest fbi agent, etc. etc. etc.
In short if such peoples are given administration rights who does not allow anyone to edit wikipedia for truth and facts then soon wikipedia will be on footpaths. Without going in depth of the reality and fact about any particular matter, no one can be said to be wrong - niether me, niether ankit fadia, niether utcarshch, nor any of my group members. This is what utcarshch is doing after getting administration powers?
The below message is a very nice matter discussed on wikipedia for the overall matter.
Thanking you.
Kalpesh Sharma
One of my group member messaqes as follows on wikipedia when he is not allowed to edit the truth about ankit fadia:
There is nothing wrong with others. It's all wrong with Indian Wikipedia Administrators who have been given rights to modify contents for well purpose of wikipedia. But so sad that though a lot of evidence appears about ankit fadia on internet as well as on this same wikipedia page, you peoples are doing arguements to find reasons. I saw various edits from all you three admins and sent a mail to HO Wikipedia with the contents that you reported to be wrong. You want to know who is using this IP? They are all the members of all kalpesh sharma group sharing single IP. Do what you can, do this protest will not stop ? Because peoples of country are being saved. nothing is being done wrong by saying the fact and truth about ankit fadia. You are all three discussing and finding about various reasons to anyway edit ankit fadia contents to what it was and don't want peoples to see the right thing. This is a challenge that if you find any content edited in ankit fadia wiki which is wrong, then come out and debate ?
Wikipedia is a reputed name for reputed peoples. Not for Ankit Fadia. If one or two or three articles were wrongly edited, we all might have not edited so many pages. but you are trying to specify that all the content edited about ankit fadia is wrong. Only you peoples are right ? All others are wrong is that what you mean. Then accept our challenge.
one more thing utcarsch, if you think what you mentioned above is right then you are wrong. Mr. Kalpesh always goes with evidence and proofs and that too right in front of eyes instead of barking on wikipedia like ankit fadia's article. As concerns to reputation how can you claim that this editing on wikipedia is because of media publicity. The pages on wikipedia have been edited by our group only from last 15 20 days, whereas ankit fadia's reputation is on net in the first thirty searches of google. First clear your concept and then speak. Go and view the logs of all the pages and urls that are posted in the article written on gather.com by kalpesh sharma itself.
Check Some Evidence about Wikipedia administrators on following links to know more. I never thought that the Wikipedia Administrators could fall upto such a lower extent. Check what public says about this administrators on wikipedia pages itself and spits on them like anything. I think may be because they have desire so. The level of corruption in wikipedia foundation has gone out of limit now, but the management of wikipedia is not yet in the mood to see truth behind their administrators:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aksi_great#About_Ankit_Fadia_page_edit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ankit_Fadia#Looks_like_Self_Promotion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aksi_great#Cannot_accept_group_posts_as_reliable_sources_.3F.3F.3F
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review#Kalpesh_Sharma
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ankit_Fadia#should_be_deleted
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Aksi_great#Kalpesh_Sharma_-_Jimbo_Wales
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ankit_Fadia#Kalpesh_on_Wikipedia
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=1086
http://www.chefelf.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=5894&st=0
http://www.aetherometry.com/antiwikipedia/awp_index.html
And Several More.....
What's else I think is there any need for evidence. In short wikipedia administrators are corrupted ! there is no doubt.
Letter from a Senior Physics Scientist with his IP address and routing details for evidence that even he faced such fraud from corrupted bribers wikipedia administrators:
Return-path: <sarfatti@pacbell.net>
Received: from ndabbmx1-a-fixed.dataone.in ([10.17.18.15])
by wppa.dataone.in (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3
2006)) with ESMTP id <0JAP00AO36LRH420@wppa.dataone.in> for mhm333@dataone.in;
Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:31:04 +0530 (IST)
Received: from conversion-daemon.ndabbmx1.dataone.in by ndabbmx1.dataone.in
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006))
id <0JAP00M015QKXW00@ndabbmx1.dataone.in>
(original mail from sarfatti@pacbell.net)
for mhm333@dataone.in (ORCPT mhm333@dataone.in); Sat,
23 Dec 2006 04:23:48 +0530 (IST)
Received: from smtp109.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.208])
by ndabbmx1.dataone.in
(Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006))
with SMTP id <0JAP00JG369JQND0@ndabbmx1.dataone.in> for mhm333@dataone.in
(ORCPT mhm333@dataone.in); Sat, 23 Dec 2006 04:23:48 +0530 (IST)
Received: (qmail 89440 invoked from network); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:53:37 +0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.1.2?)
(sarfatti@pacbell.net@68.124.66.253 with plain)
by smtp109.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 22:53:36 +0000
Content-return: prohibited
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 14:57:50 -0800
From: Jack Sarfatti <sarfatti@pacbell.net>
Subject: Fraud on Wikipedia as Vehicle for International Criminal Activities:
Warning from Kalpesh Sharma, Information Security Expert, India.
In-reply-to: <20061216.MUIVHULLTYNLPPCY@dataone.in>
To: Sudhakar Jaani <mhm333@dataone.in>
Message-id: <DF6BB910-8711-4B31-84AC-9BD3E7B841A3@pacbell.net>
MIME-version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
Content-type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Boundary_(ID_JdllJWyoycrWNN0x5+flxA)"
X-Priority: 3
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net;
h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version:X-Priority:Content-Type:Message-Id:From:Subject:Date:To:X-Mailer;
b=Sts6XO371k1Y4MsaUUjTVraYh55gqjncpRAjZhyuH+7Tp4dLPgPBq+J0FOcHrSPkNVgNjRX7p/ORtViR153P2w0MW0uqvz+gRH8hCkhd0kGFGknJovVfFBPHXy74C7jdY/vXNvX4fquIn1wvdSQV9n9cQUO0KpLdhfk6FIy7dTg= ;
X-YMail-OSG:
YcGfBvwVM1m3vvgBEx8gEd4cReF3dzxrSO1OtlJKmY8J3i746B7f.hCHJgm5GtLi8nAefJKZ9zfjT6.aowWCDNTuU_1IjfwEFpI3ap5Pc37QmeOGorPQGw--
References: <20061216.MUIVHULLTYNLPPCY@dataone.in>
Original-recipient: rfc822;mhm333@dataone.in
--Boundary_(ID_JdllJWyoycrWNN0x5+flxA)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Thank you for this information. I am aware of fraud by other Wiki administrators such as Calton Bolick. These peoples are doing with you the same thing which I faced from Calton Bolick.
Dr. Jack Sarfatti
recommend this
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 107
Great ! Daring too.
1) At the end of the comment specify your IP address in this format
MEMBER IP - [IP Address]
One of wikipedia administrator is challenging me for being a sock puppet, So I want the evidence.
You can all get your IP address clicking on the following link:
http://whatismyipaddress.com/
Thanking you all for your kind co-operation
Kalpesh Sharma
Instead of going for IP, why don't you go and post this message into Wikipedia Founder Jimmy Wales User Talk Page. As you did yesterday? Post the message in discussion for jimbo to give evidence of every user and administrators geographic location. Because they are demanding, they should also provide.
Anyway ! I am not a member niether know which community or group you run ?
MEMBER IP - [202.138.117.33]
LOL!
What the hell are we doing reading about a Wiki turf war regarding Indians no less?!
I have WAY too much time on my hands...
Check out - http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Aksi_great/Sandbox&oldid=94672984
Atleast peoples on gather will now know that how great I am, " to publish this article which has forced the world's biggest encyclopedia 'Wikipedia' Company's administrator to come to my article in a frightened condition to save his reputation" who belongs to a middle class family ?
Listen everyone on gather this is the same indian administrator about which I have mentioned in the above article. Do what you want you can 'Aksi the lower grade great'. Secondly everyone on gather, I would like to come out for an open debate on this matter now across the globe. this small issue will now rise to several countries by me and let the publi in general say what is right and what is wrong ? then you go and explain millions of them ? It's so good of you to have you here ? Now I can show the legal evidence to everyone.
Here is the matter recently I discussed on jimmy wales(wikipedia founder) user talk page. In this page I proudly said and here also proudly say that every person in this world does hard work to earn money, to earn name and fame and achieve his aim. I have achieved it so why should I shy like wikipedia administrators and why should I get afraid of whom. What are you going to do ? Do then. Everyone look at this page which I posted to Wikipedia Founder - World's biggest encyclopedia and had discussion with one of wikipedia administrator sam. Then all peoples who are part of general public please give their opinion and suggestion that what am I doing wrong if I have given my seven years towards research and contribution to science and technology, my nation and information technology community. I proudly shout and say yes I have achieved and it's my right:
[edit] Information Security Expert, India
Respected Sir,
I recently knew about you when I went through your wikipedia pages
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales [10] and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jimmy_Wales [11]
I felt glad to read about you. When you were working on a small part of wikipedia in those days, today you might be remembering about those days. Great progress ! No doubt. I am right now in the same age group when you were on the starting stage at that time, when the wikipedia company was new. If I am not wrong, as everyone dreams, In those days you might also having dreamed of the position of wikipedia today.
Even I do dream ! I want to ask you that what is wrong in if some one has a dream to be like you, or if some one has a dream to progress like you or if some one has a dream to walk on the path you were sometimes in the past. Is it wrong if I am dreaming to be like you? Is it wrong if I have a dream to have my position and my company around the globe as of wikipedia today ? I know it's a big thing I am talking about, but my questions right answers can only be given by you.
If the founder of wikipedia has mentioned his achievements on his website, does it mean that he is self promoting himself? Does it mean that the founder of wikipedia is self promoting for self publicity, if his pages are found on:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales [12] and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jimmy_Wales [13]
I am asking this because I am an Information Security Expert and from last 7 years of my life I have given to research. One more person exists in India who is similarly known in the same field - Mr. Ankit Fadia. If you go through the article of ankit fadia on wikipedia at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ankit_Fadia [14]
You will find that 60 percent of the matter mentioned in that article is wrong. But I have no objection on that as I have nothing to do with, what that person does. Here the question is of truth, fact and the reputation of wikipedia.
Now see this content, which I edited on:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalpesh_Sharma [15]
Is there anything wrong if compared with your page on wikipedia. I have just mentioned in simple words as your article is mentioned with your achievements. But the administrators of wikipedia are removing with any reasons all my articles. They are saying it's a self publicity. Then why Jimmy Wales and Ankit Fadia. Ok ! jimmy wales has atleast mentioned the truth about him. But Ankit Fadia article contains everything false for which I have many evidence. If you go through the google search for keyword 'Ankit Fadia' and keyword 'Kalpesh Sharma', you will see a lot of peoples have posted very bad and brutal language about ankit fadia. Even on one of my article on gather.com, personally ankit fadia commented bad words. So, for self defense to save my reputation created in past 7 years after hard work; I also started writing articles about him containing all the links on internet where this person was discussed badly. Now when I started self defense, the adminsitrators of wikipedia are saying that you are doing this due to jealousy ! I felt very bad on such comments by one of the reputed company's administrators. I felt as if a reputed person is tearing the reputation of another one. Because your reputation is the matter which no one other then you can personally understand. So do I for my reputation.
Actually Ankit Fadia is a self claiming and self promoting person. He is using honorable name of Wikipedia, President of India, Stanford University, FBI, CIA, CBI, etc. for his self promotional activities of his business. By doing this he achieved a lot of revenue in last 5 years through seminars, workshops, courses, etc. Please don't think that I am giving misleading information to you. I am trying to show the real fact behind this man. But this self claiming and self promoting name is being given by some of your company administrators to me, instead of Ankit Fadia by giving me name like jealous. I have saved the letters of such administrators.
I am here for justice from you to post my achievements which I am using for community interest, citizens of various nations and saving the information technology field from hacking and threats. So, that the dream of Jimmy Wales can be remembered in future, by the dream of Kalpesh Sharma.
Here is my article content which I and several members of my group tried to post and were removed by administrators:
copy and paste of article removed. Jimbo is able to review deleted content for himself if he wants.
That we have an article on Jimbo Wales is not self-promotion; Jimbo did not write that article himself. Moreover, Jimbo is clearly notable owing to having founded one of the most popular websites in the world; a discussion among editors found no comparable notability for this subject. If you have evidence that they did not consider and wish to challenge the deletion of this article, the page you're looking for is deletion review. --Sam Blanning(talk) 22:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
When you are notable, believe me, someone here will be waiting in the wings to write about you. I would love to write an (eventual, I believe) article about my grandfather, but it's too early in Wikipedia time and too close to me.NinaEliza (talk • contribs • count • logs • email) 02:05, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Nina ! This is the first time when two Wikipedia Administrators are talking with respect to me. One of wikipedia administrator utcarshch and samir( the scope ) called me jealous and sock puppeter without going in the depth of matter or investigation.
I got ur point. The sources about me are not so notable on internet, but they do appear on several print media and electronic media. If I am not wrong then do you mean that when a source is found on internet is only called to be reliable ? Then what about sources found on print media and electronic media. These sources are not a part of reputation or reliable secondary sources ?
Kalpesh Sharma
Jimmy Wales Talk Page
Yes ! you are right. That's what I am trying to say. I want to know why my article Kalpesh Sharma with undermentioned contents was removed which as posted by someone and which I edited on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalpesh_Sharma [1]
This is also not called self promotion. It's the part of achievements in a similar way like any one writes about himself when a nomination is filed for awards. Do you think that when any company invites nomination for particular awards, the nominees who mentions about their achievement is known as self promotion. If not why my article was treated as self promotion and not allowed on wikipedia on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalpesh_Sharma [2]
See a similar article posted by Ankit Fadia on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ankit_Fadia [3]
Is there any difference between my article contents below and ankit fadia's article. I have written the truth and fact whereas if you go through google for key word 'ankit fadia' you will find the evidence about how much mentioned in wikipedia article of ankit fadia is truth. Why this injustice to other users?
Several reliable secondary sources have written about Ankit Fadia, which means we can write an article about him using those sources. The article you have been copy-pasting (please stop doing that) is only verified by blog posts and similar sources which are self-published, do not have a reputation for fact-checking and are consequently not allowed as verification.
Writing a Wikipedia article is not like writing a nomination for an award. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia. Articles should be written by independent editors, working from reliable sources. Because anyone can edit Wikipedia, that does not always happen, but that is our principle. If we cannot write an article on a person because there are no reliable sources on him, than we will not have an article. --Sam Blanning(talk) 01:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Thnx a lot ! I got ur point. The sources about me are not so notable on internet, but they do appear on several print media and electronic media. If I am not wrong then do you mean that when a source is found on internet is only called to be reliable ? Then what about sources found on print media and electronic media. These sources are not a part of reputation or reliable secondary sources ?
Kalpesh Sharma
So long as the source is reliable in all other ways, then yes, print sources are just as valid as electronic ones. --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Sam Blanning
Thnx Mr. Sam ! Then please help me to start with
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalpesh_Sharma [4]
. Here is the URL of my website where I have scanned and attached all my achievments, print and electronic media articles, radio news certifcate, certificate of work with minister, government stamped certificate of work with india army intelligence, etc.
My website URL is
http://www.esnips.com/web/shriganesh33sbusinessfiles [5]
Kindly please do needfull as wikipedia does for all the notable peoples across globe. Nice talk.
No-one, including me, may write an article unless a request is made at Wikipedia:Deletion review and there is consensus to overturn. --Sam Blanning(talk) 15:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello Sam, I posted matter for my deletion for review the same day you informed me first. But same day without any back response, it was completely rmoved. I saw in history also but it was not found. IT has been removed completely. Now in such situation what shall be done.
Kalpesh
Hey Sam. You may like to see this. The above user, Kalpesh Sharma, has been disrupting wikipedia for a long time now. - Aksi_great (talk) 08:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
----------------
Now let public decide ? If any one has questions it's my honor to answer him on the debate. Please let me know. If I am not wrong I don't have to worry of such cheap wikipedia administrators.
I have started ! my work to seo and promote this article on first page of every search engine in next few weeks and then post that search engine source code to wikipedia jimmy wales page? This is my challenge that i will bring and prove that I am expert and this is the definition of achievement and not your relative ankit fadia's work is achievement from any angle. Till that time you keep luaghing and don't stop in between else you will make me laugh due to sudden stop on laughing...
HAHA HIHI HOHO
You are saying that all comments are done by me itself so let's ask jody. Hi, jody please tell aksi that you are from which place and that you are not kalpesh sharma. He thinks that every comment here is done by kalpesh i.e. me ? I don't know where this fool came from ! Don't know the difference between anything. sheet !
To phir macchar tu kyo mujhse panga kar raha hai.
See both of them writing comments at same time together on a hot debate with me.
Here are some truths on ankit fadia.
Thanks ! I saw this mailing list about ankit fadia
http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-September/009654.html
where it's mentioned that his is mother fucker
Grab your glocks when Ankit knocks! Call the cops when Ankit knocks!
Good work.
http://www.go4expert.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2276
Check it.
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Ankit+Fadia&word2=Kalpesh+Sharma
Follow the third, fourth, fifth, etc. etc. also:
http://www.go4expert.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2276
http://igniteds.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?t=11078
http://www.suck-o.com/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=1690
http://www.gather.com/viewArticles.jsp?memberId=121822&nav=Namespace
http://www.gather.com/viewArticles.jsp?memberId=155782&nav=Namespace
Bye for few days.
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=Ankit+Fadia&word2=appin
Pls. try to edit the ankit fadia page on Wikipedia and enjoy man....Why raise so noise about it.
HACKERS...pls do it......now.
Tujhe sirf http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com, nahin aise aur bahot saare kehl dikhane hai. But come out of hole, stop barking from the hidden place ?
this is my neutral opinion and i dont know your our Ankit. by the way i am also from Ahmedabad.
the time you are wasting here could be utilized there. India TV is always looking for breaking and sensational news and i know this would hit national headline if you do and they must be keen if you express your interest!