Bush has been impeached

No, he hasn't been. It is just the parting shot of an embittered congresswoman. Not that I disagree with it, but nothing is going to happen, Pelosi already said so when she was first elected.

No harm done by drawing up the bill. Somebody had to do it.

Personally, I prefer the method of allowing dem-led, subpeona-empowered investigations to disembowel the lies of the past 6 years, to the point where the public literally demands impeachment. The crimes have been committed. It's just a matter of showing the public what many of us already know.

I think it's probably better if the democrats forge ahead with their own new agenda than try to re-live the past 6 years, but that's just me, I suppose.

The Democrats are just as lost as the do nothing Republicans.

Oops, I forgot the republican passed 134 bills to change the names of public offices, therefore they were really NOT a do nothing congress.

Lost in time - Lost in space.

The fact that Shi'a are killing Sunni is not something that can easily be placed at the feet of GWB.

It remains to be seen how successful the democrats will be. I'll be happy if they are successful, but if they get caught up in this whole destructive behavior of trying to punish the republicans, I will worry.

How about passing Budgets?

To be fair, Pelosi isn't as far left as you'd seem to suggest she is. She is a consensus builder.

She may have marched in every gay pride parade that she was in town to march in, but I doubt she marched in that one parade, just because the founder of NAMBLA was there. I guess the pick of Reyes to chair the Intelligence Committee goes to show how much she holds grudges. I guess worse things could have been done to Jane Harman.

I agree that many of the new democrats are probably to the right of most of the left leaning democrats.

The impeachment process will have to be followed up by the people. There is not enough consensus among the Democrats in Congress to go for it. Everyone needs to hand-write letters to their congressmen and senators. There must be a popular movement with demonstrations and plenty of media coverage. Nixon wouldn't have had to worry about being impeached if the people weren't calling for it.

The people DON'T want GWB to be impeached! A handful of partisans want payback. Most people are probably concerned about the government functioning and passing budgets which enable executive agencies to continue operating.

I saw where, under Pelosi, the House will have five day work weeks. Under the republicans, the work week was between 2 and 3 days. lots of time off.

Payback isn't a Democratic thing. I wouldn't expect GWB to be impeached - McKinney notwishstanding.

The new Congress will keep a little more tension between the President, the Senate, and the House. I think this is a good thing. Hopefully, the country has learned its lesson about granting all of the power to one party.

I have a question for all of those who despise Bush so much?? Why, dont you call for the impeachment of everyone involved with the invasion of Iraq??? Starting with Hillary Clinton and John Kerry?? Isnt this fair? He didnt do this without some support from other parties.. They agreed to invade Iraq and all of them saw and agreed to the WMD theroy, then when things go bad, they try to distance themselves to keep theirselves out of political problems. This is why, I cant vote for either one of them. They have already lied and for those of you who said Bush lied what is the difference so has Clinton and Kerry. Just what we need in office, is a bunch of liars..

They would probably respond that the "good democrats" were duped by the twisted intelligence into accepting the facts as they were then presented. Never mind that it was later proven not to be the reality. In a way, the republicans were punished for W's failure to be upfront with the people.

"Both arguments are a distratction to the real issue which is a responsible and well thought out end game in Iraq, one which leaves the region as stable as possible. Our goal should not be a solution which allows one party or the other to look best in the eyes of Americans, but one which allows America to look better in the eyes of the world."

That is the best comment I have ever seen you make, DMP.

"I have a question for all of those who despise Bush so much?? Why, dont you call for the impeachment of everyone involved with the invasion of Iraq??? Starting with Hillary Clinton and John Kerry?? Isnt this fair? He didnt do this without some support from other parties.. "

Have you not been paying attention the last three years? Bush/Cheney/Rummy cherrypicked intelligence from non-credible sources. They relied on the testimony extracted by torture. We are in Iraq because they wanted to be in Iraq since the Clinton Administration (the letter of the PNAC to Clinton). They used 9/11 as an excuse to bring forth their predetermined plan and invaded Iraq to find 1)No weapons of mass destruction 2)No links to 9/11 or al Qaida. They gave no-bid contracts to cronies who abuse the free reign they've been given costing taxpayers exponentionally more than necessary. Reconstruction positions were given on the basis of loyalty to Bush politics instead of things like experience and competence. This administration has demonstrated that they do not have the competence to handle the power entrusted to them and should be removed for all of our sakes. Yours, mine, and the People of Iraq.

This McKinney women is a nut job, always has been. When Mayor Rudolph Guiliani(NYC) rejected the 10 or 12 million dollar check from that Saudi Prince, because it came with a lecture of how we deserved what we got, this supposed American step up to the plate and said "I'll take it". That in of itself made her a clown that didn't deserve to hold office. She embarassed herself.
Our strategy should be to leave behind a stabile Iraq, it took seven years to do that with Japan. The probelm with this conflict are that it is and never was going to be a quick job. For anyone who listened, the President stated time and time again that this war on terror would more than likely go on beyond his Preisdency. Why not, we have been at war without even addressing it for nearly three decades.
The leftists in our country have been doing nothing but their best to undermine our war effort. At first the negativity came in dribs and drabs, Americans were appalled at the rantings of the Dick Durbins and Harry Reids only to hear more and more of these rants alal Ted Kennedy's remarks , John Kerry's remarks all meant to provide our enemies with propaganda and to demoralize our troops and population. Even last week we have James Brolin directing viewers of "The View" to visit yet another 911 conspiracy site. This is the next objective of the leftists, to twist reality into fiction and get as many to believe that we weren't even attacked. What is the objective? Talk about Orwellian tactics.
Bottom line, who gives a crap about this latest childish nonsense. I never have seen so many Americans act to childish, so petty, so selfish. Is this today's AMerica, a country of selfish, spineless complainers or are we the Americans I've always thought we were, innovators,risk takers, selfless, brave, prosperous, capitalists, patriotic, protectors of liberrty, th emost powerful nation on this planet that is only bound by the imagination of the human soul.....The Amercian public and Congress suffer no loss with the departure of McKinney

A lot of the proof of my accusations is called the National Intelligence Estimate. The bad intelligence gained through tortured is well documented but I can cite a source for you if you really haven't been paying attention. It's one of the reasons Rumsfeld is wanted for Crimes Against Humanity in Germany. The Administrations confirming source was a top-member of Al Qaida who was tortured in RUmsfeld's presence. Did he deserve to be tortured? I think so. Should we believe what he said under torture? No. Did he tell Rummy what he wanted to hear? YES!

Meanwhile George Tenet's book is coming out where he claims to have told Bush, Cheney and Rummy that most of the sources of the Intelligence on Iraq are questionable. Valerie Plame was the person in charge of verifying and she found nothing. Whoops! Someone leaked your identity! Whosever bad that was, was supposed to be fired and it wasn't JUST Libby. Just so we are on the same page, I did not invent one instance of what I am writing about. Just because you chose to ignore what was going on is no blank check to deny what has been reported.