Here is a bug for the ear of Secretary of Defense Nominee, Robert Gates.
Everyone keeps referring to "The War" in Iraq.
But we are not at war with Iraq, are we?
The initial mission was to remove Saddam from power; and we did that. Mission Accomplished!
We are not now battling the Iraqi military; and our rhetoric implies that we are not at war with the country of Iraq.
So, if you are going to keep calling it a War, show me a declaration.
We should put spinning, coddling and smoke-screening to the side (at least for a moment) and get a real view of the situation. Mislabeling it only lends misperceptions; which are too often leading to inappropriate, impotent and wrongful actions.
The first steps to adequately solving any problem are: honestly admitting what the problem is; unflinchingly examining all aspects of it; and brain-storming all possible solutions for it.
After that, comes selecting a viable path, preparations and execution of plans, and a continuing conscientious review of occurring results.
Is this a conflict, military action, protracted skirmish, combat maneuver?
Knowing the proper aspects of the situation might help us discern the lack of success and lead to a more effective course.
The brutal hand of Saddam was the thing that kept Iraq together. They were united under the oppression of his violence.
That method does not and cannot fly with, or by, us Americans. We will need to find some other method capable of causing a feeling of National Unity to fill the hearts and minds in Iraq.
Let's start with asking; What do ALL Iraqi's cherish in common? and work from there.
There has got to be something we can do to help foster an atmosphere of working together over there.
Lives depend on it; ours and theirs.
--


Comments: 16
"Let's start with asking; What do ALL Iraqi's cherish in common? and work from there.
There has got to be something we can do to help foster an atmosphere of working together over there.
Lives depend on it; ours and theirs."
Excellent!
Nosty, you can call it whaever you wish, but when our soldiers and their soldiers are getting killed by enemy fire, most rational English-speakers refer to that as war.
Maybe things have changed since I was a serviceman, but whether something was labled a war, action or maneuver directly effected the pay, benefits and expectations the soldiers received.
It also proscribed what types of resources could be dedicated to the mission.
In the public psyche "war" is any protracted conflagaration; but in the technicalities of governments, lables carry meanings that define and dictate.
Governmental officials should be required to use the most accurate language, so that we (the people) can be clear on what they are doing with our men, women and money; and what position they are presenting for the country.
Are we at war with Iraq, or just joining in what is actually their war, that we started, by removing their leadership?
It is also not only the fundamentalist/militia Iraqi's (Sunni vs Shia? violence) that are a problem. Finding "something in common" as you say, would solve half the problem. I wish I had the answers. I do think the rest of the world should get over the original war, G. Bush, and help end the current violence, as it is in everyone's best interests, not just ours and Iraq's.
Thanks for your thoughts.
Which makes me wonder if we couldn't appeal to their love of their women and children. We Americans curb a lot of our behavior under the auspices of doing it "for" the children or our loved ones.
All of the people may not KNOW that all of the time, but in our one heart we do.
Interviewing the women, children, and elders and publishing these interviews worldwide is a start. If I were doing such a thing I'd show a movie first, one which shows women, children and elders from all races, cultures, religious systems, national boundary systems, etc.
Perhaps this movie would be in cartoon form.
The language spoken? Non-verbal. Maybe a combination of musics, sighs/cries/laughs etc, sounds of nature.......
Perhaps there would also be a photo montage including faces like Princess Diana, Nelso Mandela, MLK, Mother Teresa, etc.......
I'd show that to a group and then invite them to sit in tallking-circle form, and pass the talking stick, and record the gathering.
In reference to the first question in your article, B, I'd say we need to label this encounter of militaries and guerillas a "HOLDING ACTION". It feels as if the whole world is wondering whether the Mideast will flare up in genocide the way parts of Africa and Europe and in smaller doses S.America have done..........
So the Lightworkers are "HOLDING SPACE" that a higher way of being enters the mass heartmind; and the militaries and guerillas are HOLDING EACH OTHER AT BAY; and the corporatocrats are HOLDING THE MAJOR FINANCIAL AND POLITICAL CARDS; and the Women, Children, and Elders are HOLDING ON FOR DEAR LIFE; the Mothers/Daughters/Granddaughters who are being gang-raped are HOLDING ONTO THEIR LIVES as best they can; and the prayer circles of all the peace religions are HOLDING VIGILS, as are the Peacemakers, planet-wide.
It's a HOLDING ACTION, for sure.
By the way, there are so many vibrational levels of Warfare, from the highest form of "Spiritual Warfare" all the way down to the lowest level of "Mass Genocidal Warmongering." As long as there is still destructive weapons-use, and as long as the earth and the children of earth (humans as well as all other beings) are being destroyed by such weapons, the action falls into the category of "Lower-Vibrational Warfare," or "Warmongering."
Lest we get too discouraged about the corporatocracy, remember that it's the Simple Things, the Little Things, the Quiet Things, that are most important. Focusing on Beauty increases Beauty. That is the particular Truth that sets us Free.
That would only work if the is something all Iraqi's cherish in common, and I doubt that thing really exists there anymore that it exists in this country. For example, while we might all claim to cherish freedom, too often the freedom that we cherish as individuals is our own and not the freedom of those who disagree with us. Labels unfortunately mean different things to different people.