On September 14, 2006, Dog, Leland and Tim Chapman were taken into custody by U.S. Marshals in connection with charges stemming from their 2003 arrest of convicted serial rapist, Andrew Luster.
They were all released September 15th, as the judge in Honolulu concluded they are not flight risks. While out on bail, they will be required to wear electronic monitoring devices until they return to court for extradition hearings to face trial in Mexico.
Andrew Luster, the famed heir to the Max Factor cosmetics fortune, was convicted of drugging and raping three women over a four year span. During his trial in 2003, Luster fled the country to Mexico. In June 2003, Dog and his team tracked the fugitive Luster in Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, where he was living under an alias, and arrested him.
As bounty hunting is illegal in Mexico, Dog, Tim and Leland were arrested by the Mexican authorities and Luster was handed over to the United States government by the Mexicans. He was subsequently found guilty and is currently serving a 124 year prison sentence.
This is old news, however Larry King interviewed Dog last night on CNN. Dog and his compadres could be facing prison time in Mexico for vilolating Mexico's laws..
A bit of irony and modern day " American Justice "
Way to go U.S.Marshalls ! It looks like you guys got the real criminals! You guys along with ICE and the FBI are the " Real American Heroes ".




Comments: 28
Dog- ya'll did the right thing getting that monster! The public is behind you!
Yeah, real AMERICAN HEROES MY ASS. LOL
I must say....Our Government never ceases to amaze me!
I also have a few contacts that I have some disagreements with, but so is life. None of us see things the same way, nor do we agree on everything.
Take your beef with Travis somewhere else please.
It seems to me that paybe the U.S..Marshalls were pissed because Dog did a better job than they did ?
He broke Luster out of a Mexican prison. It's not like he just grabbed him off the beach. What would we do if some jerk from Mexico broke into our prison and grabbed a couple of Mexicans because they are wanted in Mexico?
Second of all, I don't care if Dog broke the law or not. He brought a rapist and murderer to face justice here in the States. Plus he broke the law in Mexico, so what do the U.S. Marshalls have to do with that ? If I were one of the U.S. Marshalls who was ordered to arrest Dog, I would have laid my badge down and quit.
Have any of you tried to call the U.S. Marshalls to report wrongdoing ? I have to no avail.
Dog is far from being a danger to society. I'm sure that the U.S. Marshalls could be chasing some real criminals around instead of chasing Dog.
This may be there chance to use some leverage on us. They could also hand out suspended sentences ...
Aren't you one of the people who is always talking about how you hate when Mexicans are breaking US laws...but you think an American has the right to break to break Mexican laws... ??
Yeah, Dog broke the law in Mexico, but remember he was trying to bring a convicted AMERICAN criminal to face justice here in the States.
Also, since Dog is a bounty hunter, who paid him to track down Luster? Or did Dog do this on his own ?
I still believe that the Federal authorities have their priorities out of order. Why didn't the Feds go down to Mexico and track Luster down ?
Dog took it upon himself to go after Luster. Per a CBS News report 8/6/03:
" The law requires that bounty hunters have a formal agreement with the bail bond agent or law enforcement, have a clean criminal record and follow local laws when they search for felons. Bounty hunting is considered a crime in Mexico. "
Dog had no agreement with anyone. He claims it was personal, yet he still tried to claim $300,000 of the $1.000,000 bail that Luster forfeited. He was denied by Superior Court Judge Edward Brodie. " He went to Mexico and failed to comply with the law. I cannot condone vigilante justice," Brodie said of Chapman.
BTW, Dog is no boy scout. He rode with a bike gang called the "Devils Disciples", had 18 armed robbery convictions as a juvenile, and served 2 years of a 5 year sentence for felony murder. He wasn't the triggerman, but for those who will argue his conviction, research the legal theory of "proximate cause" and then see if your argument holds water.
On another thought, when he went to MX to grab Luster he took along a camera crew with him. This was before he had his big deal with A&E. I have no doubt he went to MX to feed his ego. If it was personal, as he claims, what the hell was a camera crew doing with him ( the camera crew was arrested also), and why was he so aggressive in chasing the bond money. Having them along was just plain stupid. I'm sure the MX gov't confiscated the footage, giving the prosecutor a slam dunk conviction. His only hope is that his lawyer can cut him a good deal. Like i said above, NOBODY is above the LAW!!!
So are you saying its ok to break a law for a "noble" cause...?
Amy...My main issue is with the priorities of the Federal Agents. Like I said..If Eamon is right, I'll change my stance on the " Dog " issue, but that doesn't change the way I feel about the Feds. I've dealt with the FBI and ICE, and I don't trust either agency.
However, that doesn't change my feeling that he broke Mexican law and should not be able to skate past that simply because people like the result. American perspective on our people (law enforcement and bounty hunters) is Do As I Say, Not As I Do. If we ever hope to have a reasonable relationship wiht Mexico on the issue of extradition, we need to cut the crap.
Timothy, I don't trust any federal agency any further than I can throw its largest member but that doesn't make Dog right.
My understanding is Eamon is correct on the payment issue - that Dog went off on his own to try an bring Luster back for a big payday. Obviously, he didn't care how he did it.
http://www.courttv.com/news/2003/0618/lustermoredetails_ctv.html
The CBS News report is here at:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/01/09/national/main535821.shtml
There's countless articles about it. Just Google either Dog the Bounty Hunter or Andrew Luster. Luster even has a website trying to explain his side of the story.
The info about Dog's past is taken right from his website.
I believe Dog's heart and intentions are in the right place now, but we cannot condone lawbreaking of that kind and expect others to follow ours. It's a very dangerous precedent to set, although in a lot of circles it has been set. Who gets to choose what laws we can violate and where in the pursuit of public safety?
As to not trusting the Fed's, I agree with you 100% there. They seem to spend more time and money on cover-ups than crime prevention. The agency that scares me the most is the IRS. They just have way to much power.
Since Mexico has finally started extraditing criminals the Justice department has no choice but to extradite Dog and his crew. Mexico has turned over many criminals in the last few years but there are still many more we are looking for. If they don't turn over Dog and his crew then Mexico could stop it's extradition policy. They will be deported and will spend some time in a Mexican jail whether we like it or not.