I suspended my loathing of ruffles and frills long enough to let Mom explain the saccharine blouses.
"We were Christmas shopping." She spread the hideous garments on the bed, forcing me to look at them. "I told Dad we needed to keep our eyes open for something you could wear with the black suspender pants."
"Plain," I reminded her. "I wanted something plain, with no collar." After years of making clothes that I liked, I knew she remembered the no collars, no frills rules.
She gave me her one-eye roll, usually reserved for children who were annoying but not gruesome enough for the two-eye roll. "He looked through every rack in Fashion Shop, chose these three, and wanted to know which I thought you'd like best." Both eyes open now and locked in place, the intensity of her stare begged forgiveness. "I said you wouldn't like any of them."
"So you bought all three?"
"These aren't your Christmas gifts."
Years of Christmases, anniversaries, and birthdays crowded disappointment out of first place in my growing collection of emotions. Dad did not choose gifts. He left that task to Mom, unless the gift was for her and then he took one of us to make the important decision. I tried to imagine him sliding hangers across racks, comparing blouses, and picturing them on me. It was like plugging Hoss Cartwright in June Cleaver's role. Why me? Why had he gone completely out of character on me?
I picked up the solid white blouse and shuddered. "Mom, this has ruffles on top of ruffles. It looks like something a clown would wear."
She laughed. "It probably looks better on."
I dropped it back on the bed, refusing to touch the others. The red blouse made my head ache. The second white one might have been tolerable without the pink-flowered trim on the tuxedo pleats.
"The pleated one is my favorite." She must have read my mind. "I think it would look nice with the cummerbund waist on the pants."
The Nehru collar did look less torturous than the clown ruffles or the tall, red collar with two extra buttons on the neck, guaranteed to interfere with swallowing. "If I choose one, will that satisfy him?"
"Probably. You like the pleated one?"
"Why is this important to him?" I huffed, turned away from the painful display on the bed. "He hates to wear a tie. Why would he want me to have this crap on my neck?"
"I doubt he thought about collars," she said. "I think he was looking for feminine. You'll have to ask him if you want an explanation."
"I don't want to hurt his feelings."
She graced me with more eye action, this time delivering a rhetorical question. But you want me to do it for you?
"I'll wear the pink flowers." I did not say I would leave the house, or even that it would be in this lifetime. She seemed pleased when I snatched up the three blouses and left the room.
I softened by Christmas and wore the red blouse with a black skirt. Dad, short as ever on flattery, said I looked nice. I choked a thanks past the buttons on my collar and wondered what kind of nice he had in mind. Beautiful nice? Daddy's little girl nice? Virginal nice? Or thoughtful enough to wear miserable, ugly clothes to spare someone's feelings nice?
I would have bet a week of extra chores that one box under the tree held a plain, no-collar top that begged to be worn tucked behind the cummerbund on New Year's Eve. I would have lost that bet. Disappointed, mostly in myself for having selfish expectations, I put my Christmas gifts away, still wondering what I would wear with the suspender pants.
My date arrived early on New Year's Eve, but I was prepared. I sat on the couch; coat zipped to my neck to cover the pink flowers on my ruffled blouse, hoping our host had decided to move the party outdoors so I would have an excuse to keep the coat on all night.
Dad walked us to the door and recited the usual have fun, be good, call if you need me spiel in a distracted tone. "Where's your car?" he added at the end.
"My dad dropped me off," the date said. "I thought we'd walk."
I looked from Dad's questioning brow to the date's anxious weight shift to his escape leg. "That sounds good," I said. "It isn't far."
Together, we convinced Dad to put his keys back in his pocket and go inside. I promised to call him for a ride when the party was over.
When we stopped at the shopping center to scrape ice from the soles of our shoes, I decided the definition of far depended on temperature. One mile at zero was farther than three miles at seventy. We moved fast, stomped to remove snow and activate blood flow, wiped our noses, held hands to stay warm and keep from falling, and told each other it was fun.
I appreciated our host for keeping the party inside, and his parents for the crackling logs in the fireplace and hot chocolate. I forgave our friends for laughing when my date's icy shoe caused him to make a grand entrance on his ass. I remain grateful to the date for providing that moment of hysteria in which I could remove my coat and not feel as though every eye in the room was on the pink-flowered pleats.
Most of all, I will never forget when he recovered, looked over at me, and said, "You look nice." That fast, I forgot to question nice. I wore the pink-flowered blouse to school on the first day back after Christmas break, and the clown collar the next.


Comments: 108
Very well written; you kept me going even though it's past time for me to go home! Gotta run!
Loved it.
Lived in Illinois when I was in high school. I remember walking in zero weather. That's one reason I'm glad I came back to CA and never left again. :)
David, that makes sense to me. But then, I've never been a father or son. It's interesting to hear/read different perspectives.
I love this piece. There are so many great lines. For example, "It was like plugging Hoss Cartwright in June Cleaver's role. Why me? Why had he gone completely out of character on me?"
I think I had a white ruffle shirt very much like the one in your picture and a navy blue pleated skirt to wear with it. Yikes!
Also, I liked your varied versions of "nice." In fact, I liked this whole piece. It was nice. ;-)
(and thank for mentioning Hoss and June - I was afraid I would be the only one to remember them)
Did you ever see that Seinfeld episode where he accidentally committed himself to wearing a ruffled shirt, very much like the one you're describing, on a national tv interview? He called it a puffy shirt and Bryant Gumbal teased him about looking like a pirate. It was a great episode. I think you would get a kick out of it.
Dear Readers: Do not attempt to try this in your own home. You might get stuck that way!
And thanks for the warning. It wouldn't be a very pretty world if too many of us were stuck that way.
Now THERE is a verbal image that is not to be missed! (Nor taken lightly!)
"One mile at zero was farther than three miles at seventy."
Proven fact, Sandy. I swear. I clocked it on my way to school as a kid. It's exactly 3.14 times farther at zero than at seventy!
What a great article. I wish you'd been around to hear the discussion between my father and I regarding the wearing of shirts AT ALL! (But Daddy! None of the OTHER boys have to wear them!) Thank you for taking me back to happier times when the angst was all that was between us.
(I'm scared to go look at the eyeroll. Maybe I'd better drop my tenola first?)
I enjoyed reading it:)
And thank you, Mr. Turner, for your in-depth critique. I might agree with many of the technical points, but had to chuckle with the over-writing comment since I usually do the exact opposite. I will study each of your technical points more carefully after I write this, because I do appreciate your time and advice. One thing off the top, I was taught to use the em dash sparingly. I admit that my most recent writing class was five years ago and that is long enough for the trend to have changed again.
I will have to think more about your comments regarding the emotions and my pulling the story back to the father/daughter relationship. After a couple of reads, and comparing your responses to others, I am left trying to decide if I expected the reader to fill in too many blanks with personal experience/emotion, and if my personal experience is so unique that it needs more explanation before anyone will understand it. The only peace I needed to make was with myself and the blouses, since I didn't complain to my father, ask him to return the blouses, insult him, dislike him, or ask him to buy the one I wanted. I found that peace, and as far as I know, his was never at risk.
Again, I thank you and will be back after I give this critique the time and thought it deserves.
Regarding age, I thought the fact that the mother was 'keeping an eye out' for the blouse told the reader that this girl was probably not old enough to drive or buy her own clothes.
I appreciate A Turner's critique. I belong to novel critique groups where we all go over one another's work with that much attention to detail. I had written very few short stories, essays, or articles when I came to Gather and thought I was coming to a writing site where I would learn to do those well (or at least better). So, I am excited to see this level of critique.
I do have a question, Mr. Turner. Did you know I was looking for this level of critique and come find me? Or are you making the rounds and offering this to everyone on Gather? I consider you a treasure if you are making the rounds.
I can see your Mom doing the one roll and the rhetorical roll as well. (P.S. your eyes are still blue-beautiful.)
I love the way you bring your father's presence back to me, his kindness and his love.
I would add this small fuss: That fast, I forgot to question nice.
I don't think the reaction was probably one of "forgetting" to question it . . . I think it is one of the word suddenly being redefined in your mind. "Forgetting" implies that on some level, you think (or thought) that you should have questioned it, but you didn't. Given that this is, IMO, the climax of the piece, I think the impact of the sentence needs to be clearer.
Thank you, A. (I don't like the mister stuff) If you have been watching, I guess I should thank you for being brave enough to come here. Not only will I not ask you to take your show elsewhere, I will provide links to some of my other articles should you run out of things to do and want to give me more of your time. Going through my recent article list might be frustrating, since about half of it is silliness.
I printed your critique and took it to the couch where I do my real thinking. You raised great questions and I trust you to at least head me in the right direction. My only critique of your process is that you came in without stating credentials or publishing any of your own work, leaving me with no reference point from which to weigh some of your comments. On the other hand, I have read David's work and interacted with him enough to feel as though I know his writing style and his personality. His comments will carry a little more weight with me because of that relationship. I hope you will publish soon, so that I can develop the same level of understanding with you.
Thanks, David. I agree - forgot is not the right word. I'll work on that line.
I believe this could be included in the sayings book too: "The height of the jump is directly related to the length of the snake".
Thanks, Travis and Webduck.
Mr. Turner, while I appreciate your insights into perfected writing form, I read Sandy's work because of here amazing insights and wonderful commentary on all things life-defining. I need instruction on proper word-form, usage, consistency of tense... the list is long indeed. Might I suggest that, after an initial instructive critique, you might place a link to another location that is more specifically geared to an exhaustive analysis of the works of various contributors, with their approval, of course. I would certainly be open to such constructive criticism, and it sounds as though Sandy would, as well. Nonetheless, when I read Sandy's work, and the comments made in response to it, I for one would prefer to focus on how much we enjoy it. A moderate amount of "Elements of Style"-esgue criticism is certainly appropriate, but I'm not sure several pages worth are warranted in the comment section. My opinion only... forgive me if I'm out-of-place in saying so.
I chucked as I read Mary's comment about being a little nervous about comma usage. I feel the same way. And I love your comment back to her.
I can see Mark's point about critique and I would tend to agree if these comments were left on articles where the writer has never given any indication she/he wanted a critique. However, from what I have seen, Sandy, you have made it abundantly clear you WANT detailed critiques. In fact, if someone were to ask, "Who on Gather is most vocal about wanting critiques?" I would say, "Sandy K."
And if I were asked, "Who on Gather is most likely to give an uninvited and unwanted critique?" I would also respond, "Sandy K". I don't mean to be harsh. It's just an honest opinion given to someone who has time and again cried out for honesty in evalution.
While I learn so much sometimes through critiques, even on other people's work, I loathe a clearly UNWANTED critique forced upon another. Then it feels like victimization instead of constructive critique and it's painful for me to watch someone being put through that.
Sandy, I think you are an excellent writer. I would love it if you wrote more of these types of articles. Your choice to focus on what's wrong with other writers and what's wrong with Gather has discouraged me from wanting to check out your work. This essay about your childhood reminds me that you really are talented and that I ought to check out your work more often.
The reason I didn't miss the "callback" (great explanation of that concept, BTW, Mr. Turner) was that to me, it was there subtextually. When the date saw the pretty blouse and found you to be attractive, I filled in the unspoken second part of your title: I Think He Was Looking for Feminine . . . Because He Wanted Me to Feel as I Did with My Date Looking at Me Admiringly .
That being said, it would be easy enough to tie it up with a quick back-reference to your dad, even if it's as simple as the remark you made in your comment about subsequently trusting your dad in regard to how boys saw you.
Heather, my mother was only concerned with the bra. If I wore a bra, she was happy. (Now, my daughters have taken over that role.)
Mark, too bad we didn't know each other back then. You could have passed those pink-flecked tweed coats my way and I would have worn them over the ruffled blouses. We could have made each other so happy.
Marcia, thank you for your comment. I appreciate that you did come read this and am happy to hear that you enjoy the critiques as much as I have. I still believe that the invitation to critique is understood when anyone posts to a "publishing" forum that has both a rating system and comment section. Even without those things, anything published to the public is open to critique. People have sent letters and called me on the phone after seeing my work in the paper. When we 'publish', that is understood.
It is also worth noting Mr. Turner's explanation regarding why he read the piece differently. As writers, we are doing only half the job of creating a written piece. The reader is a co-creator of the finished product, and each reader brings his own expectations, history, viewpoint, etc. to his reading process. The same reader at different points in his life will read the same piece through completely different filters. I have to leave this incomplete and go now or my music teacher will be mad at me.
David, I might have to love you for saying this: One of the potential advantages of Gather, if people were actually reading and being honest, is the exposure to see in what proportion these readers exist for a piece (I am not writing well because I'm in a hurry and also am verbalizing from some location other than my logical brain -- sorry). I have been totally ineffective in my campaign for the potential advantages of honest review. There are so many, and testing the diverse audience is at the top of that list, in my opinion. You two have demonstrated this so perfectly. I am a straight-from-the-heart person. It is almost impossible for me to look at my own work with an A Turner eye. It's great for me to know that I reached the hearts of readers who are like me, but finding out why I did not reach Mr. Turner the same way is the missing half of what this Gather experience could be. The critique is not negative; learning is always positive. Even if I should decide not to revise this article (I fully intend to), I will hopefully carry this experience with me in everything else I write.
Heather, cute pun.
Great reading as usual. I would echo David about the "forgetting nice." In the last line.
When I read it I thought, "aw, that's all he had to say? What does he mean, nice?" Maybe it's because you felt ambiguous about your father's "nice," that I wondered about the subsequent nice. It seems such a non-committal thing to say.
Anyway, great post and wow, lucky you on the critique.
:-)
Regarding 'nice', (don't know if this has a place in the story, I'm just talking now), I am not like other women in many respects. Maybe because my father was a man of few words and many actions, I don't trust a great deal of flattery. I knew my father adored me, thought I was beautiful, etc. His "nice" was enough for me, as far as he was concerned. The questions were really more about me. What kind of nice did I want to be.
This last comment was interesting or maybe I am just not understanding and maybe I am reading too much into a simple statement (which is entirely possible).
Since he was so spare in his verbal flattering, how did you know he thought you were beautiful? And you say that his 'nice' was enough for you as far as he was concerned but was it enough for you? Your subsequent questioning would make it seem like it wasn't. His lack of adjectives has created a woman that distrusts flattery. Maybe because you don't believe it?
Rachaelle flattering Sandy: You have such pretty eyes! You write so well! You are insightful and so supportive of other's on this site (which would indicate to me that you are supportive of others in your life too - a notion strengthened by what you write about your family and children).
I am being silly and fawning in my flattery but really it's all sincere. ;-)
(I think)
I wrote this article about a young period, before I had ever really been in love and when I was still trying to 'create' who I would become. As a child, nice meant saying nice things, behaving myself, opening doors for people, and not picking the neighbor's flowers. At fifteen, nice gets a little deeper. Do I wear an ugly blouse rather than risk hurting my father's feelings? Do I kiss on the first date? Do I try to make everyone smile? I might need to make that part of this clearer, also. I tried to 'show' who I was through that part, and by how I played off the date. Your questions add another layer to what I will consider on the rewrite. Thank you.
A. Turner, where have you been hiding? Welcome, welcome, welcome!
.
(and I haven't forgotten the article I promised you, just haven't decided how I want to do it yet)
I've had a couple of David R comments but none in this kind of depth.
My only encounter with A. Turner has been in a semantics disagreement over the term "Author" which he suggested means only formally published writers. (I disagree, published HERE counts for me and writing of a quality that I would BUY constitutes the same.)
Regardless, I both dread and welcome both inputs into my writing. Good stuff here. I've learned much already.
You're lucky to be first among us, Sandy!
"Author" makes me think of someone dead. I prefer "writer," myself.
This is a wonderful piece and I enjoyed reading it a lot. I have no critique as I am not qualified to give any. Were I qualified....... I wouldn't have any.
David, I apologize for the comments I made that implied your willingness or my expectations that you would want to do indepth critiques on everything you read. I got a little carried away in all of this (it was like having Joe Poe back for a day) and did not mean to put pressure on you or A Turner. I was encouraged by the number of people who were appreciative of the activity. Many people on Gather are qualified to offer critique (once again, not a negative word). It does not have to be as inclusive as what A Turner offered - a line or two with one suggestion or question might lead the author/writer/copy&paster to consider a small revision that would help him/her reach more readers. Even those who ignore or slam the critique sometimes learn from the experience and apply it to later pieces. I've seen it happen here - even had a couple send private messages to thank me later.
(my opinion about first drafts - if I click on a "published article" that is obviously a first draft I will make sure my time and click are not wasted)
The biggest misconception about me is that I think everything published on Gather should be about a serious topic. That is far from the truth, as should be obvious by the number of non-serious articles I publish. I do think we should put our best effort into everything we publish, it should be original (not a copy of an email we received this morning or a joke we found on another site), and it should serve some purpose in addition to seeking points.
Curious to know whether you think the format I used there is helpful. It seems much clearer to me, though it makes for a damned long comment.
Bongo, I saw your comment and went to Mr. Burke's site (have to pay for the articles now?). I'm sorry I didn't thank you and tell you that.
Astro, would you have divorced your parents? I was really pretty lucky (or stupid). My mother made most of my clothes and I was happy witih them.
David, I will check it out and leave a comment there.
(My daughter and I are a different story)
I've said it many times before....if I paid for a writing class, I would welcome and expect feedback and a critique of my work. Here we are getting it for free, and should welcome the gift. Someone actually took the time to give us pointers, and whether we agree with their ideas or not is not the point. The time is the point...not a fluffy, how much I love you response...but some real feedback that shows that they made an effort to understand and respond to what you've written. How refreshing! I hope there's much more of this to come!
By the way...I for one welcome any feedback of anything I've written (although lately I admit I haven't written a thing because of the way Gather has gone). So for any of you that care to give me a little of your time you will not find someone who resents it, but instread, thanks you for it.
Why are you moping? You have something against onion breath?
Don't worry, onion breath and garlic breath are not a problem. I always just make sure to give as much as I receive... otherwise known as mutually assured destruction. Ironically, this tactic results almost totally in collateral damage, with the main aggressors remaining unscathed. As for moping, that's how I always am when I'm walking my toilet tissue train down the hall.