I confess, my family has a dearth of military experience. In my paternal line, they have not fought in a war since they left Scotland -- even though they had a tradition of posting armed sentries at their chapel doors in order to protect their underground ministers. They were given land in upstate New York to buffer the northern colonies from the French Papists. They were neighbors of Jane McCrea who was slain by the Native American allies of the British under Burgoyne, which shifted them from being loyalists to neutrals. Prior to that one, as a magistrate, had attempted to have Ethan Allen arrested as a "ruffian", but could not find a constable brave enough to serve the Writ.
As a group which found the Constitution to be blasphemous because it did not recognize Christ as the head of the nation and condoned slavery, they simultaneously helped stir up the Civil War -- but then were unable to fight in it because of the military oath to protect the Constitution. So my ancestors missed out on the Revolution and all of the wars between it and the Civil War. My Grandfather was too young for Spanish American War and too old for WWI and WWII. My father tried to enlist during WWII, but failed his physical. Meanwhile my generation was too young for Korea, and either age or health prevented us from serving during Viet Nam.
So we had no military tradition in our family. Two of my sons seriously considered the military -- one trying to get into one of the military academies winning a variety of military scholarships which he eventually declined. Another would probably be in Iraq right now had they not flunked him on his physical for a pin in his elbow.
As a result I did not know exactly how to react when my foster son decided to enlist even though he had full-ride scholarships. It has been a new experience for our family. He is almost at the end of his basic training and graduates at the end of the month -- he called us today. He just got out of intensive care because he did not want to fail to finish certain requirements and completed them while sick from pneumonia. He is not sure where they will be shipping him to finish his training as a map maker, but somehow he got himself signed up with the airborne.
Our family is entering new territory here. While happy he is doing something he appears to like, we are nevertheless worried about his chosen career. I guess suspicion of the military runs deep, the concern that a kid will keep all his promises, but the Army might not keep its. Not sure how an organization can get such a reputation for failing to keep its recruitment promises and still be an effective organization. But perhaps the reputation is underserved -- that is the hope we cling to as we pass this Thanksgiving with a member in boot camp.




Comments: 8
if you say you support the military, you can get away with a lot.
i think we need to stand by our veterans and military. they are not responsible for foreign policy or diplomatic decisions.
Sorry to hear that your family is so against the military, George. We don't have anyone else to keep the wolves from the door. My family also came from Scotland in 1706 and 10 of my ancestors fought in the American Revolution, on the right side.
I was proud to serve for 25 years and always wanted to payback for the many freedoms I enjoy. I must admit that the civilians were giving away our freedoms to the government/Congress at the same time as I was trying to protect them from outsiders.
Best regards, Ben
Author "Leading People to be Highly Motivated and Committed"
On a historic note I wonder if your ancestors knew mine. My mother's father's family took the same route from Scotland to New York but at the point of the Revolutionary war took a turn North and went to Nova Socia for a few generations.
Quite frankly, I have no suspicion of the Army. It does everything it can to keep promises. Sometimes it gets shot down by changes in administration--the Clinton admin was very hard on our good military men and it was his admin, not the Army, that broke promises.
Your son has made an outstanding choice and you should be very proud, not trying to denigrate the Army and his choice. I have more respect for your son for finally breaking the famiily cycle of shirking than I have for you or your silly, petty fears.
Dorine, the Paternal (McNaughton line) were Scottish Covenanters. They were settled in upstate New York in 1730's as a buffer against the Catholics in New France -- as they were violent anti-Catholics (Some were settled in Northern Ireland as well where they have been fighting Catholics ever since and have been part of the problem up there.) Once the Constitution was adopted, they had a problem because of it not specifically stating that Christ was the head of the nation and because if condoned slavery. As a result they could not take the military oath to support the Constitution. The paternal line did not leave the Covenanter religion until the turn of the 19th and 20th century and they the first time they participated in Civil Government was during the election the Prohibition Party came into existence. After that their ages did not match up for WWI and WWII, my father tried to enlist during WWII -- but they discovered that he had broken his back as a young man. Fear of having a family member come back in a body bag is not a silly fear (although I agree it is less likely now than during Viet Nam.) Don't know about any "shirking". As my grandfather was the wrong age, my father (WWII) was declined, my brothers were declined (Viet Nam) because one was partially paralyzed from an automobile accident, and the other had a collapsed lung. My father had to close his business (automobile dealership) during WWII and was trained by the government to fix a certain type of truck engine issue and went out day or night to keep the domestic truckers rolling during the war as they were keeping the trucks rolling at home with basically chewing gum and duct tape. So I don't feel anyone shirked.