Let me start by assuring you that the name I use here on Gather is my real name, Bert Bigelow, and the picture I use for my icon is an actual picture of me. The information in my profile is accurate, truthful and correct. Of course you can't be sure of that. Do you trust me? No reason why you should.
There are other people here on Gather who use obvious pseudonyms, and weird pictures or whatever for their icons. Many do not post a profile, but even if they do, can you believe it? No reason why you should.
I have noticed a few real standouts. One in particular spews out such harsh, right wing, anti-liberal, homophobic views that it is almost a caricature of reactionary beliefs and ideas. This person writes an occasional article, but spends most of his time attacking others with vitriolic comments, liberally laced with personal insults. Anyone who disagrees can expect to be showered with sarcasm, belittled, mocked and insulted.
Whenever this person enters a thread, the quality of the discussion suffers. Civil dialogue degenerates into namecalling and diatribe. Eventually, everyone tires of it except this individual, who always "has the last word."
It has occurred to me that this may not be a real person at all. In fact, it might be a liberal/gay/far-left-wing rascal who is using this caricature of the Right Wing to stir up animosity toward people of "conservative" political persuasion. If so, it has been very effective. Anyone who reads his comments is immediately repelled by his ideas and the manner in which they are presented and argued.
That idea got me thinking...I wonder how many people here on Gather are "real" people. I think I know some who are...I have communicated with them outside of Gather via Email. Some have become friends whom I hope to meet someday.
But some of our fellow Gatherers are having us on. I am sure of it.
|
by
Bert B.
Member since:
December 19, 2005 Are They Having Us On?
November 19, 2006 01:59 AM EST
(Updated: November 19, 2006 01:40 PM EST)
views: 115
|
rating: 9/10
(16 votes)
|
comments: 51
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
More by Bert B. |
||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Make New Friends |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Books | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Health | Moms | Money | News | Politics | Spirituality | Sports | Travel | Writing
Version 16865, "Oz"; Copyright © 2009 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.


Comments: 51
But some of our fellow Gatherers are having us on. I am sure of it>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I know you are correct Bert.
I change the photograph on my account, depending on mood. But you will always find my real photo inside my photos posted.
I know all over the internet there are many imposters.
I like who I am. :-)
Maybe they don't? I have no clue.
I enjoyed your article.
Thanks for your comments. I think some people just get off on the idea of creating a 'persona.' An alter ego...maybe the person they wish they were, or, in the case of my example, possibly to carry out some agenda.
I hadn't heard about the theft of icons, Felix. That's pretty nasty. Most people here on Gather are pretty decent folks, but there are a few that aren't, and like terrorists, it only takes a few to screw things up for everybody else.
thank you
I do not use my real name because with these kinds of people you mention they will use the nub of anything to attack you. Since I am in California on Yahoo message boards I am continually attacked as a San Francisco gay. I am not from SFO nor am I gay.
The day someone invents a civilized and responbible chat forum that crystalizes the wit and intelligence of real people is the day I will actually pay to interact with my fellow Earthlings. ;-)
I can tell you why I don't have a profile up, although the name is right to the extent I have put it out (Initial instead of full last name). There are people out there that will track you down and harass you to no end, if you let them. If you have not encountered one, well, I'm happy for you, but I spent over a year once getting rid of a nuisance that was very persistent, would jam my mailboxes, sign me up for all kinds of things all over the net, and write me hate notes continually. I had done nothing but disagree with this person on Usenet, in one thread. She was apparently an accomplished hacker, and I could not, nor could my ISP get a handle on her (or him, but she purportedly was female). As for my picture, trust me, you don't want that. lol
As for the person you are talking about, I can think of three that fit the description, but having encountered their type in real life, many times, I doubt you are right, they just are that annoying, really.
I am who I am. I do understand why people do this though. My profile is accurate, the things I write are true, I love my life and love sharing bits of it.
I am however absolutely SURE that you are correct. There are people amongst us who's intention is to harm.
Felix, I removed all pictures of my children from this site for the same reason as you changed your icon. I think it's just best to err on the side of safety.
Nice article Bert.
I am a real person, my profile is real except for an obvious spoof at the end. You can find pictures of me in my images if you wish, and my name is really John.
I use my icon to be unique I guess, and it represents a bit of my State of Arizona. I find that recognizing members quickly is easier with unique icons myself, as photos are sometimes hard to separate/distinguish when so small.
I leave my last name off for identity theft reasons, although I doubt it does much good if somebody really wants to do that. Now that there is more than one John S. I have been wondering if I should change that somehow, but not sure what to do.
Take care.
I've had experience with some of these Gather despoilers. They also do not like you to ignore them and will punish you by rating your previously high-rated article very low if you don't take their bait. As you have experienced, they make me feel repelled toward them and what they represent and do not further understanding of their view.
What is the best way for honest Gather people to respond to these despoilers? How can we self-regulate ourselves and the Gather community?
Verie...Despoilers is a good word for them. Realistically, there is probably nothing that can be done...nothing Gather management will do, anyway. The only self-regulation we can do is to ignore them. That is my strategy. The fact that they can use the ratings as a weapon just demonstrates the irrelevance of the ratings. I ignore them. If I am going to write controversial articles and engage in political and religious discussions, I am going to have adversaries, and some of them will try to punish me for my ideas. My choice is either don't do anything that involves any kind of conflict...and there are a number of people here on Gather who have told me that is their strategy...or forget the ratings, because they are gonna get trashed by the terrorists.
:) Nice to meet you Bert
I am a real person, offering to everyone here my true opinions and personality.
I am real because I can't be otherwise and write the kind of stuff I post, but my name is not necessarily real. I was married to a guy for 23 years who said that was his name, but I really think he made it up. He wasn't wanted by U.S. authorities, because I checked on it, but he had been a British Commando and I think he was hiding from Nazis. There were organizations after WWII out to get revenge.
I have zero fear of stalkers. In fact, I have taunted a few hoping they would show up on my doorstep. Better mine than that of someone with small kids illequipped to defend themselves... that's my theory anyway. heh.
I am actually a frog and it took courage for me to post a photo with all the anti-amphibian sentiment on the internet. My profile is imcomplete but correct except where I may have made errors.
As Dave Barry said:
on the 'net has left us (i.e., real people)
open to all sorts of tricks. I notice, especially,
around election time, an infusion (or, invasion)
of "conservative" voices, common in character
by the feature of "shouting down." It has
occurred to me, in those moments of clarity
that border on the paranoid, that the Republican
National Committee and the Central Intelligence
Agency might be dabbling in mind control, again.
This observation spans several forums over ten
or so years.
I was early repulsed by "anonymity" and that which
it allowed, though, I have become attached to the
"Wal-Mart Smiley" that turned up on photobucket.com.
I think, in the maturity of things, forum users will
have become so accustomed to "Big Brother" in his
or her various forms, both sanctioned and freelance,
that the typical response will grow to be, "Oh, here
comes another..."
And, we'll continue, using this great new communication
media to spread ideas in the most revolutionary way
since Gutenberg liberated the written word from the
monks' cells.
Hey, Bert, how do you like the way Gather.com
"reorganized" just in time to beat the heat of the
2006 mid term elections. Is it looking more like
the Free Republic every day?
I get a ton of Emails every day, and a fair amount of them are Right Wing attack pieces directed at Hillary, Kerry, Dean or just "tax and spend Democrats" in general.
If they are really gross distortions, I check them out on Snopes Urban Legends and usually find that they have been identified as hoaxes, lies, distortions...trash.
It amazes me what crap people spread around on the Web. When I get one of these from a friend, I send it back to them with the Snopes link and suggest that they might want to send a retraction to their address list for the piece.
On a couple occasions, I have copied their address list and sent the retraction myself. I have lost a couple of "friends" that way, but I figure if they were that irresponsible about the stuff they mail...maybe I don't need them as friends.
I use my icon as a way to express moods, seasons or quite simply fun. It is my quirky idea of fun.
I use only one idenity and I believe my articles and images tell about me.
I too love Snopes for finding the obvious ... but it can take some digging to find ... just need to hit the right key words for the search. However, I often enjoy the 'Urban Legends' and moralistic fluff .... just I want to have the right label for it.
Mostly, I shrug and move on.
I understand your concern about spreading personal info. I wasn't referring to people who just use pseudonyms in place of their real names. I'm talking about people who adopt a whole new persona for whatever reason. I'm not even criticizing that...nothing wrong with it. It has made me a bit...skeptical, though when I read some wild extremist posts. I think, "Is this a real person?"
sorry Bert
Okay, then I'm a rebt named Bert.
What a great article. I haven't completed a bio or posted a picture because I was having great diffiulty and chose to just get on with it and write some articles. It was very intimidating at first -- perhaps because I focus on things political and say what I have to say. Have encountered some animosity [and must confess have resorted in kind a time or two], but since this is what I believe in and want to do -- I just keep doing it. Time flies, and I still don't have an icon or pictures or anything else to personalize my page. Eventually I'll get there. In the meantime, have gotten used to the floppy, generic little icon and am finding my personal voice and my own words and, even better, finding the many genuine and inspiring voices of others. [I don't care either about the ratings or the points -- I'd pay to be able to do this - but let's not tell Newt Gingrich.]
Carol, I hope you will not let the calculated rancor of others suppress your own unique voice and what you have to say. There is a pattern of intimidation, anger and a demand for "facts" here -- that brooks no argument -- that I have learned to recognize; sometimes I respond; sometimes I ignore.
Edward Shaw, good point about your yellow smiley and the notion of the net as a revolutionary medium -- let's keep it "free." I know I'll find my "smily face" or at find something to try on for size.
Your contributions are much more important than the icon and bio. Sometimes, I think those things are an unnecessary distraction from what we are trying to do here. Your intelligence and sincerity come through loud and clear...and that's what is most important.
Here's to one more adventure-filled, action-packed year for you!
You have probably noticed that my activity here on Gather has declined recently. There are a number of reasons for this. I am not a "groupie." I don't want to start and promote groups here on Gather. So, the people who respond to my articles are usually the same, small group of close friends. You are one of them. But, I am "preaching to the choir." Most Gather members are not even aware of my writings. Unless I want to agressively promote my content, things will pretty much remain the way they are. The payoff for writing new articles is minimal. I haven't published anything since mid-November, and I have no plans to write anything at all in the immediate future.
Also, the level of dialogue has declined. A lot more personal attacks and rudeness in the threads. My skin is pretty thick. I've been on a lot of these blog/forums over the past few years. But...it gets old. When I post what I think is a logical argument, and the reply is personal insults and slurs...it gets old. And when I chide the insulter, he says, "Hey, this is the Web. That's how we do it here. Get over it."
I think...he is blaming ME for being insulted by his rudeness.
Life is too short to suffer fools.
Sometimes, you can't win with either arguments waged logically or in the abstract--so it would be best to fuggetaboudit. I hope you enjoy the holidays, and I'll look forward to your "fun for all ages" works!
I am the real thing. As I have stated before, should someone try to bring harm to me or mine in real life, good luck. IF they can get past our dogs (man eating pit bulls), they will be staring down the barrel of a '45. Or three.
Right, Joe. I sometimes think the biggest, baddest most macho characters are probably fronts for bespectacled little dweebs living out their life fantasies.
I'll make sure I stay out of your yard! (grin)
nice to meet you.
as you I am real also. I invite you to visit my gather read my poems and look at my art.
You must mean reactions to comment like this one below posted today..
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474976875924
"Thanks for your review. I don't plan to see it. I think Mel Gibson is an ass, a hypocrite and an evangelical salesman. So even if this is a good movie...and I don't deny that it is, or might be, I will never, ever go to it or any other thing he produces.
Is that logical? Is that reasonable? Is that tolerant? No, no, and no.
And I don't give a shit."
Bert B. commented Jan 3, 2007