I like the Guardian newspaper online more than I like the BBC in many respects, but definitely like to "Have Your Say" about international events on the BBC's site.
http://newsforums.bbc.co.uk/nol/profile.jspa?userID=2252752&&&&&&&edition=2&ttl=20061106022313
There are many, many things that American newspapers apparently feel reluctant to write about our nation, but the Brits feel differently. At times, they love to rub our nozes in the steaming pile of bullshit that we call "the History of America" and that applies to current events as well.
I get to write things that might not get published here, though I admit that their censors don't allow a lot of it, for reasons that eventually become obvious. But still, it's fun to see what they will post, especially because it goes onto a prominent site seen by people around the world and some of my more outrageous comments get reposted on other sites!
Some recent examples:
Is the IAEA right to criticise a report on Iran's nuclear programme?
The UN nuclear watchdog has complained to the US government that a report by the House of Representatives' Select Committee on Intelligence was "erroneous" and "misleading" in suggesting Iran had weapons-grade uranium.
A spokesman for the committee has agreed that the report was unready and relied on unclassified testimony. The American government has yet to comment on the details.
When and how should international bodies step in to correct national intelligence? How does the affair reflect on the IAEA? How does it reflect on the US government and its intelligence?Added: Friday, 15 September, 2006, 18:10 GMT 19:10 UK
In light of recent historical events, the IAEA probably shouldn't care if they embarass those who try to pass off bad information! Does anyone remember the doubts expressed about the US government's assertions about Iraq's capacities to produce weapons of mass destruction like nuclear missiles? IAEA decision makers have acted in the best interests of humanity, and that is exactly what they should do!
David Stephen Ball-Romney, Seattle, United States
Recommended by 20 people
...from an earlier "Have your Say" version:
How can we end slavery?
Around 12.3 million people are enslaved worldwide, according to a major report.
The International Labour Organisation says 2.4 million of them are victims of trafficking, and their labour generates profits of over $30bn. Migrants, women and children are most at risk from forced labour.
In some countries, like Mauritania and Niger, people are born into a class where they are viewed and treated as only being suitable for slave labour.
Why does forced labour still exist? Have you been affected by slave labour, or do you know someone who has? How can the problem be tackled?
I feel hopeful when I see various corners of the media raising awareness of the issue and the fact that many can't even recognize the slavery close to their own lives. Social justice may come some day when everyone may easily leave this world for other worlds. But for now, inequality exists because people, not just the rich and powerful, want it to exist.
David Stephen Ball-Romney, Seattle, USA
If you wish to avail yourself of "free speech" and you have something of substance to say, please consider obtaining a profile and then "Have Your Say".
If you have any "Have Your Say" comments that you would like to post in the comments section below, please indicate why you chose to do so.
rate
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 3