..LOL....your kidding,....right?......to compare Bush to Hitler can fit about 30 million other Americans & Dem's.....Thats pretty good for twisted finger pointing logic!.....BTW ,..I love your icon. I gave you a 10 because someone put some work into this fantasy film..;o)...P.S..Hitler sucks.
Christene...thanks on the work part, I made that video...you'd be surprised, it is not near as far fetched as you might think. For instance, the quotes in the movies on freedom, and there are others. Bush's use of faith based groups to win over the masses by enabling them to be the voice of his policies is a page right out of Hitler's play book.
rated 10. i'm still waiting for the player to finish buffering. it's be half an hour so far, lol. i probably disagree with it as well, but you put some work into it.
Another deluded agiong hippy pr hippy wannabe that thinks it is clever to phonetically connect the anmes Bush and Hitler together. Let's see who are this guys favorite leaders Hitler, Chavez,Stalin, Lenin, Mao,Hussein,Bin Laden, Men Ta LEE Ill, the Iranian midget....anybody that says I hate America and have killed many of my own people... How quaint to hurl epithets at our President, a man who has kept our economic ship afloat in these trying times and defended our nation from these terrorists
Thanks Trouble....you might not disagree with it, it might actually wake you up, but it was made to get people to think. It's scary to see the identical ways in which both Bush and Hitler played off religion, used it to their own end means.
Porgie... it's Thursday and you created the video today? Don't you have a job to tend to? Something to keep you busy and productive? Gotta hand it to liberals, they vote socialist, then stay at home living of the tit of the people who work for a living (me) and then try to further destroy our country with their silly politcs.
Don...yes, created said video today. Home sick with the flu, and the nice think about a laptop...I can work in bed.
Silly politics...since when is almost three thousand dead American Troops silly? Since when is it silly to make fair comparisons relating how both Hitler and Bush used/co-opted religion for their own goals and agenda?
I dont understand the comparison. Did not Hitler destroy all of the Bibles from peoples homes and Hitler was against the Jews, Bush isnt against the Jews. So wouldnt it be safe to say as many similarities that you find to support your cause, we could probably find as many if not more, that Bush and Hitler are quite opposites.
But wait Vickey - there's more. They both had hands, feet, hair (though Bush lacks the Hitler mustache)... um... so many things in common... come on, work with us on this one. Porgie - I excuse you from poor judgement since you have the flu and are dilussional.
There goes 4 minutes and 29 seconds of my life I will never get back...and I believe it was the biggest waste of time I have experienced in all my life.
There was no point; your comparisons were so weak that I believe nearly all of them could have been related to any of our past presidents as well.
Tony: "Truth hurts, doesn't it" What truth??? Now I understand why you are as ignorant as you appear...then ""Porgie, another great find. Keep'em comin'." Great what? A radio news clip from a Hitler speech with pics of GW thrown in...I think both of you have truly lost your minds...
Pretty much the reactions I expected...those who support Bush at any cost are here defending him to the very end, while those of us who see the horrid renderings of his regime grasp the significance of the video.
ha ha... it's just so friggin far fetched it's funny. Come on man, you don't really believe for a second that Bush and Hitler have similar agendas, do you?
Identical agendas....no. Similiar One World Order agendas...yes. Or have you missed the Bush Administration's efforts to create a North American Union?
Tony--I have NO problem w/ truth,...BTW,truth feels real good!......heres some truth for you,..Hitler wanted only ONE race,...Prez Bush wants to protect the human race,... YOUR truth does not make it THE TRUTH!!...How close are YOU to Hitler?..Hitler believed in abortion,do you?..Hitler hated America,..Do you?..Hitler was a good artist,..are you?..Hitler hated liberalism,...tisk,tisk,...Hitler was prone to outbursts ?...How about you?..; o )
Almost forgot..Tony--"Oh no? It will soon enough. lol"..so what are you saying?...you think the Dem's are going to take over?....Are you reading the same polls that said Kerry was going to win by a land slide?..lol....
You people are going to feel real stupid when 2008 rolls around and Bush finishes his term and leaves office. Then how will you be able to accuse him of being Hitler? Silly shit going on this topic.
When the dems DON'T get a majority in this coming election, it is going to be the best day... well, not as nice a day as Nov 5, 2004, but pretty damn close. The libs are going to go batty... and all the election fraud nuts are going to come out of the woodwork. It's going to be a blast.
'Night of the long Knives' the 'purging' of the SA members of the Nazi party, basically killing everyone in his own organization that the SS did not feel met their standards.
The Nazi's arrested or murdered many their political rivals, ensuring that their party would take complete control of the government: "In the November 1933 one-party Elections, Nazism gained 92.2% of the Electorate."
Hitler never won the presidential election, after forcing a run off with Hindenburg a political deal was made that made him Chancellor. Two years later Hindenburg died and HItler succeeded him, all the while spewing his anti-Semitic and anti-communist views, making him a polarizing figure from the outset.
Poland was NOT Hitler's first military move, it was the first contested however. He 'annexed' Austria and the Sunderland a year earlier. Once he invaded Poland, he was immediately at war with France and Britain, and then invaded the Soviet Union just over a year later, making his desire for world domination abundantly clear.
This could go on forever, but the comparisons are ludicrous, disingenuous and nothing more than the extreme left grasping at another way to attack the current administration.
Steve...actually, the world would be a far different place today if Hitler had not attacked Russia when and how he did. Polarizing figure...who does that sound like? Political deals being made...like the one that saw Bush SELECTED back in the year 2000?
Wow, Alice. That's brilliant. So Bush has been bypassing congress these past 6 years? If that's the case, we may as well not have the midterm elections.
2000 election, get over it. All the recounts, even thoes done by various media outlets and universities have all concluded that while it was close, GW did win.
So many feel that going to Iraq was all Prez Bush and his dictator ways?...lol...Have any idea how many Dem's approved of this war?......I do,..Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle announced he supports Bush on Iraq, saying it is important for the country "to speak with one voice at this critical moment."
Daschle, D-South Dakota, said the threat of Iraq's weapons programs "may not be imminent. But it is real. It is growing. And it cannot be ignored." ""I believe we have an obligation to protect the United States by preventing him from getting these weapons and either using them himself or passing them or their components on to terrorists who share his destructive intent," said Gephardt, who helped draft the measure.
126 House Democrats who voted for the Iraq war
"....over 600 SIGNING STATEMENTS and growing....yes, he is bypassing the Congress. "--could you state your source please..THX
Christene, do a simple search on Bush/signing statements....there are more sources than I could list here in a week.
As to Democrats supporting the war...it's been proved conclusively that the Bush administration COOKED the intel that Congress saw...in short, they voted on data that had been deliberately skewed and altered by Bush.
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
How many of those remarks were made on the Bush administrations claim that Saddam Hussein HAD weapons of mass destruction? How many believed Colin Powell's impassioned speech in front of the United Nations, including a dramatic ascertion of MOBILE biological weapons facilities?
"it's been proved conclusively that the Bush administration COOKED the intel that Congress saw" guess he had to be cooking it before he was President....since it was proven 'conclusively'
Hmmmmm.....how long have Cheney, Rumsfeld and others been around? Bush wanted to AVENGE his Daddy, was making plans before he became president...do yourself a favor. Go put together the whole Bush WMD message, see how he introduced it in November of 1999, and ramped it up from there.
Tom Daschle > February 11, 1998 "The (Clinton) administration has said, 'Look, we have exhausted virtually our diplomatic effort to get the Iraqis to comply with their own agreements and with international law. Given that, what other option is there but to force them to do so?' That's what they're saying. This is the key question. And the answer is we don't have another option. We have got to force them to comply, and we are doing so militarily."
Bill Clinton > February 17, 1998 "We have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st Century.... They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein."
Bill Clinton > December 17, 1998 "Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq.... Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors."
The point you originally made was the Bush lied... made up that stuff about WMD's. We've been hearing this crap for 5 years. It's just crap... libs just make shit up.
Don, Bush did LIE.....he'd gotten intel from the CIA that stated SADDAM DID NOT HAVE materials to make a NUKE, but kept that quiet, kept it OUT of the report to Congress....let me guess, you want to call that a small oversight?
Steve....myself.....I'd be supportive of a strategic premptive strike in Iran, but only if we used a serious nuke, and took out Tehran. World War II was ended because we used the bomb, instantly devasted Japan, and shocked the world into waking up to the horrid realities of war. Iran would not be attacking us if Tehran and two million people were gone in the blink of an eye.
Don....nice try. You, and others like you want to forget about the first Desert Storm when Bush Senior had the Red Guard of Saddam Hussein surrounded and let them go....further, after that war, under United Nations sanctions, most if not all of Saddam's weapons were destroyed and/or dismantled.
Regarding Condo and Colin's statements, they were edited to fit what the narrator wanted.... if you had listened to the entire context of their statements you would have heard both raise concerns about Saddam. Why did the narrarator cut them off so quickly? It's a hit and run liberal hatchet job... that's the truth Porgie... you need to use your critical facilities.
As for the second video, it was 3 seconds long. I really like the way you guys seek out the full context of conservatives. NOT. Please, you guys are pathetic.
THREE SECONDS LONG... wow... are you kidding me? That's your proof?
Bushbots; the weapons did not exist. The WMD were destroyed during the inspections following the first Iraq War I...the inspections worked then and during the days leading to Iraq War II. Iraq never attacked the United States and were no threat. Iran was and still is the threat in that region; not Iraq.
The weapons have not been found after the surveillance lies were shown to the world. The Bush administration embarassed many who believed their fabrications, including leaders worldwide. Bush and others lied about terrorist being Iraq who assisted in the attacks on 9/11. ALL LIES!!!!!!!
Truth is the antidote to deceit, conceit, and arrogance.
Bush lied about capturing or killing Bin Laden. They, still have not accomplished the number one purpose of the "War on Bin Laden." Bush lies about conditions in Iraq improving, while the war rages into chaos and you still defend him?
People are dead because of Bush's negligence, arrogance, and deceit. Ask the dead veterans, New Orlean's citizens, innocent Iraqi citizens, and the 3000 souls who died on 9/11. If their lives have meaning, Bush and his hegemony of cronies must no longer occupy leadership roles in the executive branch of American Government.
When bush rolls tanks into Canada and Mexico and murders millions of Muslims or non-Christians. When Bush carpet bombs Mexico City or murders all undesirables. When Bush burns all the books that he feels have a bad influence on our society. When Bush takes away all our weapons. When Bush rounds up all his political adversaries and executes them in firing squads (night of the long knives). Then and only then can you compare him to Hitler.
Is it possible that some day an American President could become demented and delusional like Hitler? Yes. Is it possible that it will work for that president? No it could never happen because we can boot them out of office before any damage is done.
You have wasted everyone's time with your ill-conceived video Shame on you.
David....why should Bush use force to take Mexico and Canada if he does not have to.....have you not been reading about the North American Union, al three countries with the stroke of a pen essentially becoming one.
Of course, after losing the argument based on facts, reverting back to the argument of an eight year old should do it...
Tony: "I can call him Hitler right now. Watch! "Bush is just like Hitler. He's Hitler Jr. He's more Hitler to all that which is Hitler than Hitler himself""
You seem very anxious to see all motivation against moving further toward despotism as "hate". Why can't a person simply be against such a thing because they feel it's wrong? If you thought it was happening, would you not try to do something to stop it?
John Knight: "Why can't a person simply be against such a thing because they feel it's wrong? " John you have every right to your opinions, and to express them. But articles such as this cross the line. When faced with the actual FACTS, they are shown to be what they really are, a farce. Express yourselves, by all means, but when you cross the line you will be called on it.
Porgie: "Republicans expect us to sit meekly by as we labeled and marched off to camps" Who has been marched off? Actually, name me one American who has been detained and questioned without merit? If you are going to compare the US to Nazi Germany, and reference it as such, then be prepared to back it up or just back off.
Tony: "Careful John, you're asking him to exercise rational thought." You don't know the meaning, so you really shouldn't make such statements.
Bush was elected twice. He's two terms. We've got the majority in both houses, the executive and a conservative majority in the judical. Liberals need to figure out why this has happened. Stop bashing conservatives and look in the mirror.
The URL for this article is www.emperors-clothes.com/articles/randy/swas5.htm Click here for a printable version
Join our email list at http://emperor.vwh.net/MailList/index.php Receive about one article/day.
Click here to email the link to a friend.
This article may be reproduced in any non-commercial medium but please include the entire text and the URL. For commercial use contact Emperor's Clothes.
www.tenc.net * [Emperor's Clothes]
Nazis in the attic, part 6
By Randy Davis
GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH
...Like Nixon, George Bush was deeply involved with supporting the Nazis in the Republican's closet. In fact, support for the Nazis was a Bush family tradition which goes back more than six decades and, once again, to Allen Dulles.
Loftus and Aarons write: "The real story of George Bush starts well before he launched his own career. It goes back to the 1920s, when the Dulles brothers and the other pirates of Wall Street were making their deals with the Nazis. . . ." Check out the link.
Your closed mindedness and arrogance is exactly how Hitler and Bush defined their strategy to distort truth. The Bush family helped bring many Gustapo type intelligence agents into the CIA during the cold war to fight communism, while simultaneously continued teaching the Republican party how to shape rural America's thinking into the present staus quo. You are the face and the voice for their ideals in today's culture of speaking loud and wrong headed.
By believing in some Republican party narcissistic leaders, you become whatever they tell you to become. And people who deceive you, and many others to follow their ideals, are preparing you for a huge downfall into an abyss that is similar to what happened to the German people, unless you learn to think, question, ask and realize what the truth is that will stop your downward spiral.
Should you continue to defend these horrendous people and help vote them into power, you help destroy American ideals of integrity in local, national, and international governance that always error on the side of hope.
If you do not care and want to remain foolish. The choice is yours. We will end this political chaos with the facts of truth.
Talmadge...well written responses. I was aware of the Bush family history in Nazi Germany, and where a huge portion of their original wealth came from, which is one of the driving forces behind my making of the video.
Don, you best enjoy that majority while you can....all the polls seem to be pointing in favor of Democrats winning back the house, and a dark horse at taking the Senate....we'll see in just over a week.
Talmadge - George H W Bush is the president's father. I am so glad you can keep your facts straight in a debate.
Porgie - there is no doubt that you are talented at the technical aspects of making a video. What you are lacking is the ability to make a logical and compelling argument or even to illustrate a cogent thought.
Given that both were leaders of their nations, it would be miraculous if you couldn't find enough film clips and sound bites to make this video. I bet you could do the same thing with ALL of our Presidents.
Being a person of faith applies to billions of people worldwide. How that makes a person the equivalent of Hitler is beyond me.
Given time, I bet someone could pull your posts and then pull equivalent quotes from Charles Manson. Does that mean you are a mass murderer?
Nanci.....first, it's common knowledge that the Bush family wealth was amassed on profits from Nazi Germany, and a special bill passed through our own Congress all those years ago. Another major portion of the Bush family wealth came from some rather disturbing involvements with the Bin Laden Family, and a 50 million dollar loan.
Curious, have you ever actually checked out the Bush family...every one of Jebb Bush's children have had run ins with the law, Jebb himself was involved in some shady business dealings during his time in Latin America. Both of George's girls had their own brushes with the law, only difference is, all this children were handled with KID GLOVES because of who their parents were. Even George Bush himself is rumored to have paid for the abortion of a girl he impregnated while attending Yale. I know for a fact, that George Bush twice was found passed out under a street lamp on the Campus, drunk as a skunk....family values...give me a break.
Have you looked into the North American Union that Bush is trying to get formed by the year 2010? Did you know it's laws and tribunals would SUPERCEDE our laws, and that George Bush is slated to be it's FIRST PRESIDENT, with NO TERM LIMITS, and no elections.....SWEET DEAL HUH?
Porgie- what on God's green earth does any of that have to do with the video you made.
The President is not his brother's keeper. Gee, brothers that allegedly do stupid things. It's a large fraternity - Hilary Rodham Clinton's brother was involved in shady dealings. Jimmy Carter's brother had his own brushes with the law.
If Bush's ancestors amassed their wealth as you say, what is your point? It doesn't make Bush the American Hitler.
Nor does the vision you described make him the American Hitler.
Nanci....curious here how much you have actually studied Nazi Germany, Adolf Hitler, and the build up to the Holocaust? Are you aware that Hitler claimed to be of the Lutheran faith, that much of the early success of Hitler and his minions was through faith based organizations? A great deal of the Nazi medals hold a great deal of religious symbolism to them, be more than happy to post up some pictures that might awaken your intellectual desire to research this topic more before you come into this thread and discredit my facts and theories. Are you aware of George's belonging to a secret fraternity, or a very special group that gathers once a year out west that the Bush family is intimately involved in?
George Bush's status as a deserter, failing to fulfill his military duty is the LEAST of what concerns me about him, and the Bush clan. I did not vote for them in 2000, nor in 2004, and history will show that one of the darkest moments of our democracy will have been his time as President of the United States...he, and his entire family are evil personified.
Actually yes I am. My grandfather was a freedom fighter who was forced to flee the country or be killed. My grandmother spent two years in hiding with my aunt and uncle until Poppa could raise the money to bring them here.
I haven't argued the truth or falsity of your assertions. I have maintained throughout that these 'facts' you rely on do not support your thesis that Hitler and Bush are alike.
You have great passion. I have no doubt that you believe deeply in what you say. But even if everything you say is 100% true, your video still lacks a cogent thesis, explanation and end. It is unfortunately a trend of the left to equate Bush to Hitler but you cannot make a silk purse from a sow's ear.
Nanci...you make it obvious that you DO NOT understand the medium being worked within.....on you tube, at best you have 10 minutes. Reality is, those viewing on You Tube are not going to give you half that time. Even then, at five minutes, your video is not going to be widely seen, as it is STILL TOO LONG. The tipping point for great distribution/hits seems to be 90 seconds, or less. My most popular video on You Tube runs 87 seconds. The idea (from my perspective) with the videos I produce is to wake people up, to get them to think....I would say the discussion here, the comments there, the number of people who have so far viewed this video make it successful in its goal.
Talmadge, no offense meant, but you will have to do better than some crackpot web site...Do you really believe everything you read from any source? If you are that gullible then you are not worth debating...I would agree with one point, that site is about as crdeible as the video, derived from the same hate at least, not actual facts.
Prescott Bush did not stop doing business with Nazi Germany until a special bill was introduced that REWARDED him handsomely for doing so.....case closed.
Peter....we'll see who laughs last....Bush was looking pretty PASTY in Indiana today.
You think he's aged so far, wait to see how haggard he'll look with Democrats in control, and investigations openned up on a host of Republican wrong doings.
Oh for God's sake. You don't think that a hallmark of the Nazi and fascist regimes was to attack everyone that held a different opinion than theirs and to opine that theirs was the valid view point?
"You don't think that a hallmark of the Nazi and fascist regimes was to attack everyone that held a different opinion than theirs and to opine that theirs was the valid view point? "
Are you F ING kidding me. I am sorry, I guess I did not read in the Gather Bylaws that the 1st person to get their point into print wins, no matter if it is true or not. The truth is that Nanci has nailed the Democratic platform.
Bruce.....hardly....Nanci's words very specifically identify the rabid foaming of the mouth radical right wing born again religious wacko's of the Republican Party....zealots of there ever were any.
There is a theme that recurs over and over among "Bush supporters", I tried to ask Charles about it, as I have others several times. Though he speaks of:
"Source? Reference? Link? Verifiable evidence of any kind?"
He and many others are compelled to see all criticism of our President as based on "hate", without any perceivable evidence for this claim. It is used to refute any and all assertions that something is amiss with our republic. This is itself a form of evidence that comparisons to previous despotic rulers is worth exploring.
This reaction is not even close to rational, or persuasive, unless one is already convinced that we are under the rule of trustworthy leaders, and therefor it is automatically slanderous to even think about the possibility that they could behave in any way similar to a Hitler or Saddam.
To discount the possibility that others are concerned for our freedom, and not personally interested in a single figurehead, is a great way to avoid the issues they raise. But is in fact indulgence in the very thing they accuse their opponents of doing: Basing their debate on personal assessment of Mr Bushes character. If their judgement about this man happens to be in error, there is no reason not to wonder about his attitude toward checks on his power. He has demonstrated on numerous occasions that he wishes to share power with no one. That is why many are suspicious of him, not their hatred.
Charles...people like you always amuse me. You expect everyone else to do your HOMEWORK for you, make it easy for you. You disagree with what I have to say about Prescott Bush, do some homework, rather than expect me to hold your hand while you shat all over this thread.
There have been countless instances of rulers that sought and achieved absolute power over their countries. We all know this to be an irrefutable fact. We all know that our governmental form is based primarily on preventing this very real possibility from occurring to us. Why is it now time to cease being vigilant about this common development?
Always this despotic condition is fostered by the desire of the people to be protected. Saying that we our under threat is no reason to become blind to the danger of despotism, particularly when our leaders are themselves intentionally amplifying the nature of that threat. Of course it is more expedient to have a single source for deciding how to deal with a threat, but we as a people have since the beginning elected to forgo that expediency in favor of protection from tyranny. Please stop trying to stifle the voices of those that may be an early warning of something terrible happening, just because you have not yet arrived at the conclusion that those warnings are accurate. Obviously, if we don't listen to warnings with an open mind, they are useless...even if accurate.
It is your very disdain for those warnings that male you vulnerable to them turning into something you will not be able to dismiss.
"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance", not derision of the vigilant.
You have accused people of this hatred many, many times. You are well aware of that. Please address what I said or don't pretend you're talking to me. I have seen you reason well enough to know you are ducking my assertion.
Conspiracy theories." "Fringe nuts." "Lies." "Myths." These are the words being used by officials of the Bush Administration and others to brand those who oppose him. He seeks to discredit those who oppose him and fortify those who follow him out of fear of supposed "terrorism"....all the while sneaking in the back door his policies of forming a trilateral commission and forming a North American Union, to which he will be the "First President" of this union. This would, in effect, dissolve our Constitution, as we would no longer BE the United States of America. This would, in effect, dissolve our laws. This would, in effect, dissolve our rights, liberties, and freedom as a people. There would BE no longer, America as we know it. Bush would be the "new" president of a "new" country, formed behind our backs, without even Congress' permission.
President Bush was heard saying, when questioned about the Constitution: "It's only a g-damned piece of paper".
Do we not see the diversionary tactics of this "war on terror"?? Do we not see the REAL reason behind what is going on? The pact of the North American Union been signed. President Bush, it was agreed, would be the "new" president of this NAU. Did no one pay attention to March of 2005???
Is there REALLY a Republican party? Is there truly a Democratic party? Or are we left with a war between the peoples of our nation and diversionary tactics to prevent us, through our own fears and ignorance, to see the TRUTH...that Bush is to be the "next president" of a very large, and very powerful, continent!??
The United States is the most unique nation on earth. We were created out of a radical idea that free people, with their freedoms protected by the government would be happy and prosper beyond imagination. The idea worked. Now, the Bush Administration is ignoring this historic fact to obtain a dictatorship, stripping the citizens of this country of every liberty, every freedom, every right.....for his own agenda of supreme power and control.
While we are masticating the cud fed to us, we are seriously missing what is occuring behind the scenes.
Cheri....well written and stated. Sadly, much of the diatribe in this thread, the low score of this article shows that most Americans are asleep at the wheel.
rate
email
print
link to this page
Comments: 141
Niether enlightening nor correct and definitely non-constructive.
Let's see who are this guys favorite leaders Hitler, Chavez,Stalin, Lenin, Mao,Hussein,Bin Laden, Men Ta LEE Ill, the Iranian midget....anybody that says I hate America and have killed many of my own people...
How quaint to hurl epithets at our President, a man who has kept our economic ship afloat in these trying times and defended our nation from these terrorists
Silly politics...since when is almost three thousand dead American Troops silly? Since when is it silly to make fair comparisons relating how both Hitler and Bush used/co-opted religion for their own goals and agenda?
There was no point; your comparisons were so weak that I believe nearly all of them could have been related to any of our past presidents as well.
Tony: "Truth hurts, doesn't it" What truth??? Now I understand why you are as ignorant as you appear...then ""Porgie, another great find. Keep'em comin'." Great what? A radio news clip from a Hitler speech with pics of GW thrown in...I think both of you have truly lost your minds...
'Night of the long Knives' the 'purging' of the SA members of the Nazi party, basically killing everyone in his own organization that the SS did not feel met their standards.
The Nazi's arrested or murdered many their political rivals, ensuring that their party would take complete control of the government: "In the November 1933 one-party Elections, Nazism gained 92.2% of the Electorate."
Hitler never won the presidential election, after forcing a run off with Hindenburg a political deal was made that made him Chancellor. Two years later Hindenburg died and HItler succeeded him, all the while spewing his anti-Semitic and anti-communist views, making him a polarizing figure from the outset.
Poland was NOT Hitler's first military move, it was the first contested however. He 'annexed' Austria and the Sunderland a year earlier. Once he invaded Poland, he was immediately at war with France and Britain, and then invaded the Soviet Union just over a year later, making his desire for world domination abundantly clear.
This could go on forever, but the comparisons are ludicrous, disingenuous and nothing more than the extreme left grasping at another way to attack the current administration.
2000 election, get over it. All the recounts, even thoes done by various media outlets and universities have all concluded that while it was close, GW did win.
Daschle, D-South Dakota, said the threat of Iraq's weapons programs "may not be imminent. But it is real. It is growing. And it cannot be ignored."
""I believe we have an obligation to protect the United States by preventing him from getting these weapons and either using them himself or passing them or their components on to terrorists who share his destructive intent," said Gephardt, who helped draft the measure.
126 House Democrats who voted for the Iraq war
"....over 600 SIGNING STATEMENTS and growing....yes, he is bypassing the Congress. "--could you state your source please..THX
As to Democrats supporting the war...it's been proved conclusively that the Bush administration COOKED the intel that Congress saw...in short, they voted on data that had been deliberately skewed and altered by Bush.
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
- Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002
"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002
Think that is check, and MATE.
"The (Clinton) administration has said, 'Look, we have exhausted virtually our diplomatic effort to get the Iraqis to comply with their own agreements and with international law. Given that, what other option is there but to force them to do so?' That's what they're saying. This is the key question. And the answer is we don't have another option. We have got to force them to comply, and we are doing so militarily."
Bill Clinton > February 17, 1998
"We have to defend our future from these predators of the 21st Century.... They will be all the more lethal if we allow them to build arsenals of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. We simply cannot allow that to happen. There is no more clear example of this threat than Saddam Hussein."
Bill Clinton > December 17, 1998
"Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq.... Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors."
I guess George was even at it in '98?
On that same note, would Iran or North Korea's nuclear facilities qualify as 'legitimate military targets'?
http://www.iraqwatch.org/wmd/timetable.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1X-I-38lrU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSmJcSw3bg0
THREE SECONDS LONG... wow... are you kidding me? That's your proof?
The weapons have not been found after the surveillance lies were shown to the world. The Bush administration embarassed many who believed their fabrications, including leaders worldwide. Bush and others lied about terrorist being Iraq who assisted in the attacks on 9/11. ALL LIES!!!!!!!
Truth is the antidote to deceit, conceit, and arrogance.
Bush lied about capturing or killing Bin Laden. They, still have not accomplished the number one purpose of the "War on Bin Laden." Bush lies about conditions in Iraq improving, while the war rages into chaos and you still defend him?
People are dead because of Bush's negligence, arrogance, and deceit. Ask the dead veterans, New Orlean's citizens, innocent Iraqi citizens, and the 3000 souls who died on 9/11. If their lives have meaning, Bush and his hegemony of cronies must no longer occupy leadership roles in the executive branch of American Government.
It is time for change!
Is it possible that some day an American President could become demented and delusional like Hitler? Yes. Is it possible that it will work for that president? No it could never happen because we can boot them out of office before any damage is done.
You have wasted everyone's time with your ill-conceived video Shame on you.
Tony:
"I can call him Hitler right now. Watch!
"Bush is just like Hitler. He's Hitler Jr. He's more Hitler to all that which is Hitler than Hitler himself""
LOL...dude you need serious help
Why it's the identical twins Tony S and Hitler.
You seem very anxious to see all motivation against moving further toward despotism as "hate". Why can't a person simply be against such a thing because they feel it's wrong? If you thought it was happening, would you not try to do something to stop it?
"Why can't a person simply be against such a thing because they feel it's wrong? "
John you have every right to your opinions, and to express them. But articles such as this cross the line. When faced with the actual FACTS, they are shown to be what they really are, a farce. Express yourselves, by all means, but when you cross the line you will be called on it.
Porgie:
"Republicans expect us to sit meekly by as we labeled and marched off to camps"
Who has been marched off? Actually, name me one American who has been detained and questioned without merit? If you are going to compare the US to Nazi Germany, and reference it as such, then be prepared to back it up or just back off.
Tony:
"Careful John, you're asking him to exercise rational thought."
You don't know the meaning, so you really shouldn't make such statements.
Bush was elected twice. He's two terms. We've got the majority in both houses, the executive and a conservative majority in the judical. Liberals need to figure out why this has happened. Stop bashing conservatives and look in the mirror.
The URL for this article is www.emperors-clothes.com/articles/randy/swas5.htm
Click here for a printable version
Join our email list at http://emperor.vwh.net/MailList/index.php
Receive about one article/day.
Click here to email the link to a friend.
This article may be reproduced in any non-commercial medium but please include the entire text and the URL. For commercial use contact Emperor's Clothes.
www.tenc.net * [Emperor's Clothes]
Nazis in the attic, part 6
By Randy Davis
GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH
...Like Nixon, George Bush was deeply involved with supporting the Nazis in the Republican's closet. In fact, support for the Nazis was a Bush family tradition which goes back more than six decades and, once again, to Allen Dulles.
Loftus and Aarons write: "The real story of George Bush starts well before he launched his own career. It goes back to the 1920s, when the Dulles brothers and the other pirates of Wall Street were making their deals with the Nazis. . . ." Check out the link.
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/randy/swas5.htm
By believing in some Republican party narcissistic leaders, you become whatever they tell you to become. And people who deceive you, and many others to follow their ideals, are preparing you for a huge downfall into an abyss that is similar to what happened to the German people, unless you learn to think, question, ask and realize what the truth is that will stop your downward spiral.
Should you continue to defend these horrendous people and help vote them into power, you help destroy American ideals of integrity in local, national, and international governance that always error on the side of hope.
If you do not care and want to remain foolish. The choice is yours. We will end this political chaos with the facts of truth.
Porgie - there is no doubt that you are talented at the technical aspects of making a video. What you are lacking is the ability to make a logical and compelling argument or even to illustrate a cogent thought.
Given that both were leaders of their nations, it would be miraculous if you couldn't find enough film clips and sound bites to make this video. I bet you could do the same thing with ALL of our Presidents.
Being a person of faith applies to billions of people worldwide. How that makes a person the equivalent of Hitler is beyond me.
Given time, I bet someone could pull your posts and then pull equivalent quotes from Charles Manson. Does that mean you are a mass murderer?
Curious, have you ever actually checked out the Bush family...every one of Jebb Bush's children have had run ins with the law, Jebb himself was involved in some shady business dealings during his time in Latin America. Both of George's girls had their own brushes with the law, only difference is, all this children were handled with KID GLOVES because of who their parents were. Even George Bush himself is rumored to have paid for the abortion of a girl he impregnated while attending Yale. I know for a fact, that George Bush twice was found passed out under a street lamp on the Campus, drunk as a skunk....family values...give me a break.
Have you looked into the North American Union that Bush is trying to get formed by the year 2010? Did you know it's laws and tribunals would SUPERCEDE our laws, and that George Bush is slated to be it's FIRST PRESIDENT, with NO TERM LIMITS, and no elections.....SWEET DEAL HUH?
The President is not his brother's keeper. Gee, brothers that allegedly do stupid things. It's a large fraternity - Hilary Rodham Clinton's brother was involved in shady dealings. Jimmy Carter's brother had his own brushes with the law.
If Bush's ancestors amassed their wealth as you say, what is your point? It doesn't make Bush the American Hitler.
Nor does the vision you described make him the American Hitler.
The proof is in the putting? That's scary.
George Bush's status as a deserter, failing to fulfill his military duty is the LEAST of what concerns me about him, and the Bush clan. I did not vote for them in 2000, nor in 2004, and history will show that one of the darkest moments of our democracy will have been his time as President of the United States...he, and his entire family are evil personified.
I haven't argued the truth or falsity of your assertions. I have maintained throughout that these 'facts' you rely on do not support your thesis that Hitler and Bush are alike.
You have great passion. I have no doubt that you believe deeply in what you say. But even if everything you say is 100% true, your video still lacks a cogent thesis, explanation and end. It is unfortunately a trend of the left to equate Bush to Hitler but you cannot make a silk purse from a sow's ear.
Or maybe if we all yell loud enough we can get your puppet masters to move your other arm and leg.
You think he's aged so far, wait to see how haggard he'll look with Democrats in control, and investigations openned up on a host of Republican wrong doings.
Sounds VERY REPUBLICAN to me.
Are you F ING kidding me. I am sorry, I guess I did not read in the Gather Bylaws that the 1st person to get their point into print wins, no matter if it is true or not. The truth is that Nanci has nailed the Democratic platform.
"Source? Reference? Link? Verifiable evidence of any kind?"
He and many others are compelled to see all criticism of our President as based on "hate", without any perceivable evidence for this claim. It is used to refute any and all assertions that something is amiss with our republic. This is itself a form of evidence that comparisons to previous despotic rulers is worth exploring.
This reaction is not even close to rational, or persuasive, unless one is already convinced that we are under the rule of trustworthy leaders, and therefor it is automatically slanderous to even think about the possibility that they could behave in any way similar to a Hitler or Saddam.
To discount the possibility that others are concerned for our freedom, and not personally interested in a single figurehead, is a great way to avoid the issues they raise. But is in fact indulgence in the very thing they accuse their opponents of doing: Basing their debate on personal assessment of Mr Bushes character. If their judgement about this man happens to be in error, there is no reason not to wonder about his attitude toward checks on his power. He has demonstrated on numerous occasions that he wishes to share power with no one. That is why many are suspicious of him, not their hatred.
Always this despotic condition is fostered by the desire of the people to be protected. Saying that we our under threat is no reason to become blind to the danger of despotism, particularly when our leaders are themselves intentionally amplifying the nature of that threat. Of course it is more expedient to have a single source for deciding how to deal with a threat, but we as a people have since the beginning elected to forgo that expediency in favor of protection from tyranny. Please stop trying to stifle the voices of those that may be an early warning of something terrible happening, just because you have not yet arrived at the conclusion that those warnings are accurate. Obviously, if we don't listen to warnings with an open mind, they are useless...even if accurate.
It is your very disdain for those warnings that male you vulnerable to them turning into something you will not be able to dismiss.
"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance", not derision of the vigilant.
You have accused people of this hatred many, many times. You are well aware of that. Please address what I said or don't pretend you're talking to me. I have seen you reason well enough to know you are ducking my assertion.
President Bush was heard saying, when questioned about the Constitution: "It's only a g-damned piece of paper".
Do we not see the diversionary tactics of this "war on terror"?? Do we not see the REAL reason behind what is going on? The pact of the North American Union been signed. President Bush, it was agreed, would be the "new" president of this NAU. Did no one pay attention to March of 2005???
Is there REALLY a Republican party? Is there truly a Democratic party? Or are we left with a war between the peoples of our nation and diversionary tactics to prevent us, through our own fears and ignorance, to see the TRUTH...that Bush is to be the "next president" of a very large, and very powerful, continent!??
The United States is the most unique nation on earth. We were created out of a radical idea that free people, with their freedoms protected by the government would be happy and prosper beyond imagination. The idea worked. Now, the Bush Administration is ignoring this historic fact to obtain a dictatorship, stripping the citizens of this country of every liberty, every freedom, every right.....for his own agenda of supreme power and control.
While we are masticating the cud fed to us, we are seriously missing what is occuring behind the scenes.
WAKE UP, people. WAKE UP.