Countdown Special Comment: Death of Habeas Corpus: "Your words are lies, Sir."
Keith Olbermann has been calling it like it is. His "Special Comments" are indeed special because no other talking head outside of Cafferty is willing to step up to the plate and say what needs to be said on 24/7. "Your words are lies, Sir." They are lies, that imperil us all.' Sounds about right to me.
Olbermann: And lastly, as promised, a Special Comment tonight on the signing of the Military Commissions Act and the loss of Habeas Corpus.
We have lived as if in a trance. We have lived… as people in fear.
And now — our rights and our freedoms in peril — we slowly awake to learn that we have been afraid… of the wrong thing.
Therefore, tonight, have we truly become, the inheritors of our American legacy. For, on this first full day that the Military Commissions Act is in force, we now face what our ancestors faced, at other times of exaggerated crisis and melodramatic fear-mongering:
And lastly, as promised, a Special Comment tonight on the signing of the Military Commissions Act and the loss of Habeas Corpus.
We have lived as if in a trance.
We have lived… as people in fear.
And now — our rights and our freedoms in peril — we slowly awake to learn that we have been afraid… of the wrong thing.
Therefore, tonight, have we truly become, the inheritors of our American legacy.
For, on this first full day that the Military Commissions Act is in force, we now face what our ancestors faced, at other times of exaggerated crisis and melodramatic fear-mongering:
A government more dangerous to our liberty, than is the enemy it claims to protect us from.
We have been here before — and we have been here before led here — by men better and wiser and nobler than George W. Bush.
We have been here when President John Adams insisted that the Alien and Sedition Acts were necessary to save American lives — only to watch him use those Acts to jail newspaper editors.
American newspaper editors, in American jails, for things they wrote, about America.
We have been here, when President Woodrow Wilson insisted that the Espionage Act was necessary to save American lives — only to watch him use that Act to prosecute 2,000 Americans, especially those he disparaged as "Hyphenated Americans," most of whom were guilty only of advocating peace in a time of war.
American public speakers, in American jails, for things they said, about America.
And we have been here when President Franklin D. Roosevelt insisted that Executive Order 9-0-6-6 was necessary to save American lives — only to watch him use that Order to imprison and pauperize 110-thousand Americans…
While his man-in-charge…
General DeWitt, told Congress: "It makes no difference whether he is an American citizen — he is still a Japanese."
American citizens, in American camps, for something they neither wrote nor said nor did — but for the choices they or their ancestors had made, about coming to America.
Each of these actions was undertaken for the most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons.
And each, was a betrayal of that for which the President who advocated them, claimed to be fighting.
Adams and his party were swept from office, and the Alien and Sedition Acts erased.
Many of the very people Wilson silenced, survived him, and…
…one of them even ran to succeed him, and got 900-thousand votes… though his Presidential campaign was conducted entirely… from his jail cell.
And Roosevelt's internment of the Japanese was not merely the worst blight on his record, but it would necessitate a formal apology from the government of the United States, to the citizens of the United States, whose lives it ruined.
The most vital… the most urgent… the most inescapable of reasons.
In times of fright, we have been, only human.
We have let Roosevelt's "fear of fear itself" overtake us.
We have listened to the little voice inside that has said "the wolf is at the door; this will be temporary; this will be precise; this too shall pass."
We have accepted, that the only way to stop the terrorists, is to let the government become just a little bit like the terrorists.
Just the way we once accepted that the only way to stop the Soviets, was to let the government become just a little bit like the Soviets.
Or substitute… the Japanese.
Or the Germans.
Or the Socialists.
Or the Anarchists.
Or the Immigrants.
Or the British.
Or the Aliens.
The most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons.
And, always, always… wrong.
"With the distance of history, the questions will be narrowed and few: Did this generation of Americans take the threat seriously, and did we do what it takes to defeat that threat?"
Wise words.
And ironic ones, Mr. Bush.
Your own, of course, yesterday, in signing the Military Commissions Act.
You spoke so much more than you know, Sir.
Sadly — of course — the distance of history will recognize that the threat this generation of Americans needed to take seriously… was you.
We have a long and painful history of ignoring the prophecy attributed to Benjamin Franklin that "those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
But even within this history, we have not before codified, the poisoning of Habeas Corpus, that wellspring of protection from which all essential liberties flow.
You, sir, have now befouled that spring.
You, sir, have now given us chaos and called it order.
You, sir, have now imposed subjugation and called it freedom.
For the most vital… the most urgent… the most inescapable of reasons.
And — again, Mr. Bush — all of them, wrong.
We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who has said it is unacceptable to compare anything this country has ever done, to anything the terrorists have ever done.
We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who has insisted again that "the United States does not torture. It's against our laws and it's against our values" and who has said it with a straight face while the pictures from Abu Ghraib Prison and the stories of Waterboarding figuratively fade in and out, around him.
We have handed a blank check drawn against our freedom to a man who may now, if he so decides, declare not merely any non-American citizens "Unlawful Enemy Combatants" and ship them somewhere — anywhere — but may now, if he so decides, declare you an "Unlawful Enemy Combatant" and ship you somewhere - anywhere.
And if you think this, hyperbole or hysteria… ask the newspaper editors when John Adams was President, or the pacifists when Woodrow Wilson was President, or the Japanese at Manzanar when Franklin Roosevelt was President.
And if you somehow think Habeas Corpus has not been suspended for American citizens but only for everybody else, ask yourself this: If you are pulled off the street tomorrow, and they call you an alien or an undocumented immigrant or an "unlawful enemy combatant" — exactly how are you going to convince them to give you a court hearing to prove you are not? Do you think this Attorney General is going to help you?
This President now has his blank check.
He lied to get it.
He lied as he received it.
Is there any reason to even hope, he has not lied about how he intends to use it, nor who he intends to use it against?
"These military commissions will provide a fair trial," you told us yesterday, Mr. Bush. "In which the accused are presumed innocent, have access to an attorney, and can hear all the evidence against them."
'Presumed innocent,' Mr. Bush?
The very piece of paper you signed as you said that, allows for the detainees to be abused up to the point just before they sustain "serious mental and physical trauma" in the hope of getting them to incriminate themselves, and may no longer even invoke The Geneva Conventions in their own defense.
'Access to an attorney,' Mr. Bush?
Lieutenant Commander Charles Swift said on this program, Sir, and to the Supreme Court, that he was only granted access to his detainee defendant, on the promise that the detainee would plead guilty.
'Hearing all the evidence,' Mr. Bush?
The Military Commissions act specifically permits the introduction of classified evidence not made available to the defense.
Your words are lies, Sir.
They are lies, that imperil us all.
"One of the terrorists believed to have planned the 9/11 attacks," …you told us yesterday… "said he hoped the attacks would be the beginning of the end of America."
That terrorist, sir, could only hope.
Not his actions, nor the actions of a ceaseless line of terrorists (real or imagined), could measure up to what you have wrought.
Habeas Corpus? Gone.
The Geneva Conventions? Optional.
The Moral Force we shined outwards to the world as an eternal beacon, and inwards at ourselves as an eternal protection? Snuffed out.
These things you have done, Mr. Bush… they would be "the beginning of the end of America."
And did it even occur to you once sir — somewhere in amidst those eight separate, gruesome, intentional, terroristic invocations of the horrors of 9/11 — that with only a little further shift in this world we now know — just a touch more repudiation of all of that for which our patriots died —
Did it ever occur to you once, that in just 27 months and two days from now when you leave office, some irresponsible future President and a "competent tribunal" of lackeys would be entitled, by the actions of your own hand, to declare the status of "Unlawful Enemy Combatant" for… and convene a Military Commission to try… not John Walker Lindh, but George Walker Bush?
For the most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons.
And doubtless, sir, all of them — as always — wrong.
Joe Scarborough is next.
Good night, and good luck.


Comments: 31
We all are, even the dumbest-assed Republican collaborator, in a world of shit.
"Mother of Mercy, is this the end of Rico?"
What I'd like to see is when someone inevitability gets on this thread trashing Mr. Olbermann as a "lefty" etc., I'd like to see if they can actually come up with verifiable inaccuracies in his statements. I've done my homework, and I've found that Olbermann's team has certainly done theirs. I couldn't come up with anything that is patently inaccurate.
Although I was never a supporter of Bush, a year ago I wouldn't have supported the impeachment of Bush. Not necessarily because I didn't feel he hadn't done some very wrong things, but because I didn't want to go the route of the Republicans. I truly feel we need more consensus and less backstabbing in order to get things done. I have changed my mind. This President not only deserves impeachment, I find it to be a duty at this point. George W. Bush has violated his Oath Of Office by violating our Constitution and subjugating our Bill Of Rights. I'd love to hear from anyone that supported Clinton's impeachment try to defend Bush from his. That will be the the ultimate in hypocrisy.
The main reason I feel Bush should be impeached now is to show the world that we, as a people, are still who we have claimed to be. THE beacon of democracy in the world. I'm afraid we have lost that over the last three years.
Peace
The beacon is still just barely flickering. Hopefully we can do something about it after November. That is, unless the fiendish Diebold machines strike again.
why has this article been flagged by the community? anyone know?
is this tied into the email that i got about copyright and cnn?
is someone on gather trying to silence opinion?
http://www.gather.com/viewArticle.jsp?articleId=281474976819510
i am neither a liberal nor a rightwinger. i'm a moderate. i don't agree with anyone but me. i am polar opposites with everyone.
i try to respect people's opinions. i don't name call.
but if someone wants me gone, gather could remove me. i'm not staff. just set up a group like most of the other people that did.
i am at a loss.
and i'm particularly not feeling like commenting on gather editorial team's current "topic" until this thing is resolved. they gave me 24 hours. so i'm giving them 24 hours to answer exactly what they're talking about in their form letter to me.
Heidi, I wondered the same thing when I first saw the tag...who knows if that was it or if someone reported the article becasue they didn't like it or agree with it..
More and more these days, either on the internet or the radio or the television, commentators are coming out against the war, against our freedoms being taken away and against the 'liberalistic Americanization' and the 'forward thinking and political correctness' that is running rampant in our culture of free people. WE must STAND and take a stand against the destructive progress that is guised in support for a Free America. WE must STAND to combat the 'enemy at the door', which would be the goose-stepping, night stick carrying, political war machine that current stomps a mud hole in our individual and collective civil and personal rights. For what it's worth . . . WE MUST STAND. Why?
WE THE PEOPLE HAVE THE POWER!
Barbara, thank you for passing this along. Every time I hear Mr. Olbermann deliver a Special Comment lately I have been aware of our place in time, and wonder if future generations will ask me if I was there when Mr. Olbermann spoke out.
God bless you and God bless the United States of America.
Strange thing, for some reason this article is not featured first on my profile page but hidden on the next page even though it's the most recent one....
Of course, the 7th of November is circled with a big red circle in my mind..;)
The Reich-wingers hate 'em though. ;-)
Peace
And..the enemy wins when they divide and conquer
Susie, I understand your father's thinking and believe that might have been true 20 years ago...but times change and this Bushmeister doesn't deserve our respect...the office of the President does, it's just that he doesn't belong there..and I'm not the only one to think that...even his generals are agreeing this war should be ended and that we went into it for the wrong reasons...even his cabinet members have admitted something is wrong in the "land of Oz."..that is our nations capital and the people that are running our nation...
respect for the office yes, but I have no respent for the man sitting in the big chair or his co-horts.
I do respect your opinion though, just don't understand it
I agree about dividing and conquering somewhat but we have no choice now..our country is truly split , whether good or bad, it's happened and we need to change for the betterment of all..
Thanks for your thoughts.
Thanks to everyone for stopping by and sharing what they think...whether I agree or not...I do believe we need a change...a big change
You stated, "And..the enemy wins when they divide and conquer", that very statement holds true, but to the opposite of what you might think. Practically the whole world, and the VAST majority of Democrats, stood firmly behind this President after 9/11. It is Bush himself that has played the divide and conquer tactics that has us in the position we are in today. He has done it in foreign policy, social issues, economic issues, et-al. It is the "Rove Doctrine", and it has worked well. The problem with it is that eventually people wake up and smell the coffee, and unfortunately for this nation, the coffee is burnt and strong.
And for you Ron, I must quote a much more prolific man that I concerning your statement, " The world is a very different place than it was just 20 years ago." History shows we are no different...
{A government more dangerous to our liberty, than is the enemy it claims to protect us from.
We have been here before — and we have been here before led here — by men better and wiser and nobler than George W. Bush.
We have been here when President John Adams insisted that the Alien and Sedition Acts were necessary to save American lives — only to watch him use those Acts to jail newspaper editors.
American newspaper editors, in American jails, for things they wrote, about America.
We have been here, when President Woodrow Wilson insisted that the Espionage Act was necessary to save American lives — only to watch him use that Act to prosecute 2,000 Americans, especially those he disparaged as "Hyphenated Americans," most of whom were guilty only of advocating peace in a time of war.
American public speakers, in American jails, for things they said, about America.
And we have been here when President Franklin D. Roosevelt insisted that Executive Order 9-0-6-6 was necessary to save American lives — only to watch him use that Order to imprison and pauperize 110-thousand Americans…
While his man-in-charge…
General DeWitt, told Congress: "It makes no difference whether he is an American citizen — he is still a Japanese."
American citizens, in American camps, for something they neither wrote nor said nor did — but for the choices they or their ancestors had made, about coming to America.
Each of these actions was undertaken for the most vital, the most urgent, the most inescapable of reasons.
And each, was a betrayal of that for which the President who advocated them, claimed to be fighting.
Adams and his party were swept from office, and the Alien and Sedition Acts erased.
Many of the very people Wilson silenced, survived him, and…
…one of them even ran to succeed him, and got 900-thousand votes… though his Presidential campaign was conducted entirely… from his jail cell.
And Roosevelt's internment of the Japanese was not merely the worst blight on his record, but it would necessitate a formal apology from the government of the United States, to the citizens of the United States, whose lives it ruined.
The most vital… the most urgent… the most inescapable of reasons.
In times of fright, we have been, only human.
We have let Roosevelt's "fear of fear itself" overtake us.
We have listened to the little voice inside that has said "the wolf is at the door; this will be temporary; this will be precise; this too shall pass."
We have accepted, that the only way to stop the terrorists, is to let the government become just a little bit like the terrorists.
We have a long and painful history of ignoring the prophecy attributed to Benjamin Franklin that "those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."}
So yes Ron, we Democrats, "lefty's", and more and more Independents and some honest Republicans are becoming fearful, but not of the pussy terrorist's. We have become fearful of the foolish that seem to ignore history, so we can continually repeat it. We have a great and rich history in this country. You'd be best served if you could pull your head out of your ass and learn it, live it, and love it.
Peace
Once captured and sent to prison, an enemy combatant goes before a preliminary tribunal to see if he is being accused of crimes properly. If they say he is, he can appeal that to the DC Circuit Court of appeals. If he isn't happy with that he can go to the Supreme Court.
OK, now let's assume he went on trial at the actual Tribunal and is found guilty. He can appeal that to the DC Court of Appeals, and on to the Supreme Court if wanted.
So, supposedly you can't just be picked up off the street and sent anywhere into obscurity without due process. This is also I hear, more options of appeal than a US soldier gets if accused of a crime, or found guilty, while on active duty.
So does Keith give the whole story?
Peace