The House approved the bill, 409-2, while the Senate passed it on a voice vote.
"This legislation takes immediate action to heighten the security of our nation's seaports, which could be exploited by terrorists for delivering weapons of mass destruction to the United States," said Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., whose Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations led a three-year investigation into maritime security vulnerabilities. "Through this bill, we will be better prepared to address national security concerns that could arise in port cities."
Because the bill was one of the last pieces of legislation to be approved by lawmakers before they return home for the elections, House and Senate leaders tried to add several provisions unrelated to port security. In the end, the only extraneous provision added is one that would crack down on the $12 billion online gambling industry.
The bill authorizes $3.4 billion over five years for maritime security programs. It requires the Homeland Security Department to issue regulations on container security standards, and to create a plan for resuming trade in the event of an attack.
The bill authorizes a $400 million port security grant program, although the final version of the fiscal 2007 Homeland Security appropriations bill, which the House and Senate both approved late Friday night, only provides $210 million for port security grants.
Notably, the bill also requires the Homeland Security Department to establish a test program at three foreign ports to evaluate an integrated technology system to scan all U.S.-bound cargo. The department would be required to implement systems for scanning U.S. bound cargo at all foreign ports "as soon as possible."
The bill also requires the nation's 22 largest ports handling 98 percent of all cargo entering the country to install radiation monitors by the end of 2008.
Democrats were upset, however, that they were not allowed to propose amendments to the bill that would have provided billion in dollars for rail, transit, freight and passenger security, and lifted the cap on how many screeners the Transportation Security Administration can employ.
"This bill lacks important rail and transit protections passed by the Senate, but it does retain the right balance between trade and security," said Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont. "It ensures that the trade so essential to the U.S. economy will still thrive under stronger security measures."


Comments: 18
Interesting point. When I first started following this story, I thought that the Port Security Bill would be great, it would secure our ports, it would stop illegal immigrants who arrive in shipping conatiners, it would stop potential terrorists, but who would have ever thought that the Feds would use it to monitor online gambling? For Christ's sake what does online gambling using a credit card issued by a U.S. bank have to do with port security ?
yes, homeland security. they got around to this 6 years later? now what kind of a signing statement will bush write? maybe he can attach his own legislative priorities to it. we don't need a congress. we got bush and his signing statements.
What really scares me about bills such as this is the fact that they can be used against American citizens, even though they seem on the surface to be intended to protect us.
Based on history ,it is INCREDIBLE that this bill should pass thru with only one substantive rider attached.Yet that is the single component you guys are choosing to comment on?
I also notice how the article ignores the sop to unions in the background check provision for port employees.
I would be the first to agree that this is not the whole solution,but at least it is a step in the right direction.
Yes it's a step in the right direction. Only 1% of shipping containers arriving in U.S. ports are inspected, and that's just sad. Illegal immigrants, drugs and God only knows what or who is coming to our country via those shipping containers. But again, just what the heck does online gambling have to do with port security ? This is exactly the kind of rider that shouldn't be attached to such a bill.
And this has what to do with Port Security ?
Richard,
What ???
Don't forget about the illegal Chinese who crawl out of those shipping containers.
Perhaps some of them are working at a Chinese restaurant near you.
I'm glad that you understand Richard. I think that he is a good guy, but sometimes I have a hard time understanding what he writes.
Your article does state that the online gambling issue is "unrelated" the port issue...
"Because the bill was one of the last pieces of legislation to be approved by lawmakers before they return home for the elections, House and Senate leaders tried to add several provisions unrelated to port security. In the end, the only extraneous provision added is one that would crack down on the $12 billion online gambling industry."
I'm thinking perhaps they want to address the issue of gambling still being illegal in some areas, or perhaps they want to obtain some of the lost revenue due to online gambling. Just a guess!