We need to stop this gay agenda and the problems its causign our great nation. IT MUST BE STOPPED! All God-Fearing men and their families must come togather and fight for our county. We are on a slipery road to becoming the next Sodom. All of us must stop this menice before America is detroyed by hellfire and brimstone.
Stop the homosexuals, save our children and future.
We Need a Coalition of the God-willing to Defeat Gay Conspiracy
by Rick Mercier
RESPONDING TO a grave and gathering danger to the American family, President Bush reportedly has decided to back a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.
Thank the Lord. We are blessed to have a president who has the courage and wisdom to set right what the drafters of our Constitution got so grievously wrong.
I must confess, though, that I am a bit disillusioned. I just don't understand how the Founding Fathers could have failed to defend the sanctity of marriage.
Maybe they had a hidden agenda. They did seem to be dandies of sorts who liked to spend a lot of time in the company of other men. Have historians considered this angle?
Whatever the case, I'm grateful for the president's willingness to bring this constitutional shortcoming to the nation's attention, even if the whole thing will be tough on the Old Dominion. Will we still be able to hold famous Virginians James Madison and George Mason--the main architects of our Constitution and Bill of Rights--in high esteem?
At least Virginians have the consolation of knowing that such tenacious defenders of the family as Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell dwell among us.
Those who are out to destroy the family are currently making a slick pitch to mainstream America. The leading homosexual lobbying group, the Human Rights Campaign, is saying that the marriage amendment, if ratified, would be the first one in the Constitution "that would deny rights to a group of Americans."
"Since the Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791, the Constitution has only been amended 17 times," the group says. "Those amendments have overwhelmingly been used to expand rights."
Yeah, yeah, yeah. No one needs a civics lesson at this critical juncture in our nation's history. We need to focus on preventing homosexuals from gaining special treatment, such as having guaranteed equal access to health insurance, parenting privileges, and Social Security survivor benefits.
Some family-haters have suggested that the president's support for a marriage amendment would be yet another example of his pandering to the fundamentalist right.
It may be true (as Kevin Phillips notes in his new book) that about 40 percent of the votes cast for Bush in 2000 came from the Religious Right, but the president himself is a committed Christian. So when he does something like visit Bob Jones University to give his candidacy a little boost, or appoint a faith healer to a Food and Drug Administration committee on reproductive health, or nominate for an AIDS advisory panel a man who once called the disease a "gay plague," he simply is acting out of conviction.
I guess elitist, anti-Christian liberals just can't stand that fact.
I do have one piece of advice for the president: Consider the international dimension of this struggle to defend the American family.
Just think about where most of this weirdness concerning gay rights is taking place in our country (excluding California, because California is pathologically weird). It's going on in Vermont, where they allow civil unions for gay couples; in New Hampshire, where they have an openly gay Episcopal bishop; and in Massachusetts, where an activist court is trying to force gay marriage on a fearful public.
Now think about what country is up there near those three states. That's right--Canada. The same Canada where gays can legally marry.
I urge the president to form a coalition of the God-willing to fight the growing international homosexual conspiracy. We could start with the Vatican and maybe some of our Muslim friends--like Saudi Arabia. Maybe we can also encourage a few allies from the New Europe--for example, Bulgaria and Latvia--to line up with us against decadent Old Europe nations such as France.
Meanwhile, let's see if we can't scare up some intelligence showing that those madmen in Ottawa are involved in weapons of mass destruction-related program activities.
Oh, Canada, you'll make a lovely 51st state.


Comments: 57
This Rick Mercer seems like a real thinker, Bob.
What were they thinking?!?
Really now, don't you have better things to do with your time than worry about the 10% of the population that is gay, and perchance might want some of the same rights given to our heterosexual brothers and sisters.
I know, right?
I know, right?"
arrr
You have got to be kidding me. Yet another uninformed and motive driven rant. Please, just be real and say you think homosexuality is "icky". Stop trying to cover up your homophobia by caring about families, because gay marriages wouldn't do a damn thing to families.
The sanctity of marriage? Puh-lease! What is the divorce rate in the US? I don't think it's the gays causing divorces in these sactified marriages.
Save families by PUNISHING DEAD BEAT FATHERS. Save families by ending poverty. Save families by supporting dug and alcohol abuse centers. Save families by requiring parenting education in schools. Save families by allowing counselling to be accessible for all.
Nah, let's just go after the gays...
How do you plan to stop the "gay agenda" are you going to babysit everyman in the USA. Or do you have some sort of spray or something.
Stop ranting about things that can't happen and read history book . look what happens when a society trys to restrict too many human rights.
Homosexuals deserve the same civil rights as heterosexuals. I am for "civil unions," which can confer all of the rights of "marriage," without changing the biblical meaning of the word. The US already endorses the concept of "common-law" marriage, and many churches and temples will perform same-sex marriage ceremonies. This "battle" is lost for true believers, but they have the right to speak out against it, all the same.
I consider gay marriage bad public policy, and sinful, but our government has also legalized abortion. All any of us can do is to try to make a reasoned argument against the policies we disagree with. Personally, I'd rather not explain my arguments against gay marriage in a comment, because of the complexity of the issue.
Hopefully, I'll post about it sooner or later.
I. Call to order
A. Shut off alarm
B. Make Bed
II. Hygiene
A. Brush Teeth
B. Shower
C. Shave
III. Health
A. Breakfast
B. Exercise
IV. The Crappy Stuff
A. Sit in traffic
B. Work
C. Sit in traffic again
V. Better Stuff
A. Dinner
B. Dishes
C. Television or music
D. Talk to a friend on phone
E. Read book until bed time
And another thing. Attention Gather homos. I'm not getting the memos and it's not fair. Point of order. I want to place Captain Travis on the agenda.
" Here's what sickens me: people who eat Miracle Whip."
eewwww and to think I married one! blech
Sandy, I'll be skipping II.C. and III.B.
Hey dude, that spell checker has helped a lot, really.
Your rally doesn't seem to be going so well though...
19 nay, zippo yeah,... not so gay.
Folks, we've really got to quit hanging around him.
I know it's fun, but the thrill is gone, as is his mind.
(Makes about the same amount of sense.)
Oh, and on the MIRACLE whip thing? Gimme the HELLman's, thank you. The religous right has already damned me, so why not eat well on the way?
2. What do you expect to acheive when you call upon men and their families? How dare you assume that God fearing men and their families are automatically threatened by homosexuals in society. "All God-Fearing men and their families must come togather and fight for our county. "
3. Someone please explain to me how it is that Christians can logically choose gay marriage as an issue to get crazy about, but you all still play footbal with dead pig's skins, wear clothing made of two different materials, and you don't stone your daughters for having sex prematurely....?
What were we talking about?
Hey Bob,
As a feminist,
I am happy we have been replaced as the great satan of anti-americanism.
Have you FORGOTTEN the FEMINIST AGENDA,
I think I might get mine out and flog you.
But first I want you to post some details of the Gay Agenda.
Would you do that, Post the details of the Gay Agenda,
I can't find one anywhere.
I could be wrong?
Oh, I have a copy of the feminist agenda, just not the gay agenda. I think Bon detailed the lesbian agenda in a different article...
stop coming onto us you know asking us if we want to go out
last night I had sex with Jane Fonda's book while my husband slept in the same bed. When he woke up in the morning I told him it was all over and that I was going to marry Jane.
He burned my book. Then he burned all of our books in the house, saying that I am having sex with too many books.
I am now afraid of books.
Will I go blind?
Do you think Bob is making me gay?
Oh wait, Bob, did you think he was serious?
At first I thought it was satire, but then he never cracked a smile. So you know the guy's writing?
But I don't think that Bob's kidding. Which makes his choice of Mercer even better. ;-)
But Mercer is still a scream...
Fascinating.
How many also think Stephen Colbert is a protégé of Bill O'Reilly?
The Gay Bride
Immigrants, liberals, and gays… OH MY!
Know Your Wingnuts: The Martyr
This post has to be a joke. No person who could spell 'togather' can be all bad, right?
And Jackie, I do admire you for staying on track.
I live in Massachusetts, and I have witnessed (from afar) a gay marriage or ten. They all seemed perfectly dignified to me. I have not for an instant felt threatened or coerced or frightened by this 'agenda'.
the objective of every gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered person is to take over the world by having sex with members of the same gender. we must be DAMN good in bed!
The people who most actively and violently fight against the people who disagree with them, in this country at least, are fundamentalist Christians: if you do or are something with which they disagree, they are quick to condemn and attempt to stamp out your difference. I realize that there are some fundamentalist Christians to whom this does not apply, but the ones to whom it does apply are the ones we hear from most often. They believe that everyone MUST be Christian and must read and interpret the Bible exactly as they do.
It seems to me that it boils down to a matter of control disguised as love...if he can control what everyone else does and make them do what he does, then the fundamentalist knows he will go to heaven, or so he believes. If everyone else conforms and sees the right of what he does, then he must indeed be right and not have to fear condemnation to hell. Often, he is so certain that his way is the right and only way that his heart aches for the poor, misguided sinner who refuses to conform.
In my own opinion, there is only one sin, and that sin is to intentionally harm someone or something unnecessarily. Do I think you have to agree with me? No. Do I hope you'll respect my belief? I do hope so. Would I try to force you to respect it? Of course not.