Political figures like to remind us they're working for us.
Yeah, sure.
Very seldom do they mention they also work for themselves.
Let's all, collectively, realize the huge mistake we're allowing to continue by letting a few decide for the destiny of so many.
Democracy is "one man, one vote".
In theory.
But since we don't vote so often, let's say we currently enjoy a sort of monarchy with planned "king swappings" along the way.
No country in the world enjoys true democracy, at this moment in time.
Maybe it's impossible to do better.
Who knows?
But still, I wonder.
What caused us to abandon such an amazing "democratic" ideal?
Was it the cynical people? Those who can't share and spend their life over-accumulating... for their personal pleasure (read: illness) of "amassing mountains of stuff"? Or was it the thieves and those who never care about whoever "completes" them (wether they realize it or not)?
Yes... and no.
Perhaps it's us.
And everybody else.
But if we made this choice, maybe we can swing it around.
For the sake of true, effective, distributed and adapted democracy.
Let's attack the current status quo head on.
It's going to be imperfect but nevertheless, let's try the following.
First off, not every human being is created equal.
Yes, we're all pink inside, I know.
But there's a lot more to this.
Case in point: denying the gifts of the gifted (among us) by forcing them to a life of mediocrity because some other, equally human but unfortunately less gifted, is a situation that is equally prejudicial as failing to provide proper attention to those who's gifts may be lesser.
Secondly, the humans who lead need to find a different pattern of equilibrium with those who prefer to be lead than plain and simple domination. That pattern, in and of itself, has ruined so many generations, namely by denying the "dominated" the ability to draw up a different (and probably more diverse) future.
Stated simply: "Me, myself and I" doesn't work, socially speaking (or "democratically" speaking).
Distributed power to decide empowers everyone, instantly.
Centralized power empowers the "leaders" even more.
As a consequence of centralization, the small problems that need to be dealt with easily get lost, litterally crushed under the grandiose dreams only "the leaders" get to decide upon.
In this kind of logic, the one we're experiencing in our "pseudo-democracy", the small problems become issues and inevitably switch to emergencies and probably died off as catastrophes.
Major ouch!
Think: environment.
Okay, you get the idea.
Lastly, the justification for action, for all humans (except for the various flavours sociopaths) should come from within.
If your conscience tell you it's right, it probably is.
If it's a bigger deal, discussing it with trusted friends and perhaps complete strangers could help but ultimately, the glue that holds it all together is when every human being takes full responsibility for his actions.
He and only he can (and should) stand before his peers and justify his actions. After a while, not relying on others to "suggest" our every move will win us back our own power to decide, to assume and to eventually justify.
This enables us to live empowered lives.
Perhaps a tad more complicated to grasp but so much more fulfilling, gratifying and reflective of the best we're capable of.
Democracy, as a concept (the ideals depicted in so many books), probably isn't perfect but what we have right now ("pseudo-democracy") doesn't work too well either.
For instance...
National debt is out of control.
Personal debt reaches unprecented levels.
Environmental issues go unwatched.
People spend more time in traffic than making love, by spectacular multiples.
Thus creating unbelievable social tension (in countless forms).
Parents send their children, their flesh, to relative strangers to have them watched (at the kindergarten) while they work their life away to make someone else financially independent.
They basically dump their most precious gift, in life, every morning in a "facility" where they learn part of the most important values in their lives.
Parents want to do the right thing but frankly, is this what's best for their children? Seriously. Think about it.
Then, at the other end of the age spectrum, old people die alone every minute, in America, while their kids (turned into busy adults) try to make enough money to pay the interest (not the capital) on their mortgage.
Everybody's trying their best and yet, we all have that little thought, once in a while, that there has to be a better way.
Democracy can surely be expressed in a more "granular", "precise", "compassionate" and "human" way.
Right?
Voting every four years doesn't cut it for me... anymore.
I've tasted democracy and found it very inspiring.
Now, I want more of it... way more.
Do you feel likewise?
by
Claude Gelinas
Member since:
June 8, 2006 The future of -real- democracy
August 26, 2006 02:02 AM UTC
views: 0
|
comments: 19
Please provide details below to help Gather review this content. If it is found to be inappropriate and in violation of the Gather Terms of Service, action will be taken.
You have successfully submitted a report for this post.
|
|
|
||||
About Gather |
Engagement Marketing |
Gather Points |
Advertise on Gather |
Gather Press |
Privacy |
Terms of Service |
Community Guidelines
Books | Business | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Giveaways | Health | Money | Moms | News | Politics | Sports | Style | Technology | Travel | Writing
Books | Business | Celebs | Entertainment | Family | Food | Giveaways | Health | Money | Moms | News | Politics | Sports | Style | Technology | Travel | Writing
Version , "Zach"; Copyright © 2012 Gather Inc. All rights reserved.




Comments: 19
The most frightning statement I have ever heard is "I'm from the government and I am here to help you"
Personally the idea of unchecked 'democracy' is more scary to me than a "benevolent" dictator. Unchecked democracy will either descend into anarchy/mob rule or/& the power vaccuum will inspire someone crafty to make a power play to become absolute ruler.
We delegate by default, too much perceived power to the executive, even when it is about things he/she has no control over. Anything happens, and the first words are what is the President going to do. If it is perceived, there will be an attempt to use it. If you want to see real change, see about what your Congressman or Senator is up to first. They represent you and your state. They create and approve laws. Pay attention to them and what they are, or are not doing to your liking, then bitch or praise the President. All this blind party loyalty for one or the other, and what party (instead of who) is going to be in the White House in 2008 won't change a thing.
I agree most with this:
"Parents send their children, their flesh, to relative strangers to have them watched (at the kindergarten) while they work their life away to make someone else financially independent.
They basically dump their most precious gift, in life, every morning in a "facility" where they learn part of the most important values in their lives.
Parents want to do the right thing but frankly, is this what's best for their children? Seriously. Think about it."
vote buying is rampant and that is how you are elected in here. election education is needed where most of the people are illiterate and lack information. but who will do this? the governement? who are runned by politicians?