Some months ago, I spent a week in Houston on business. Along the freeways, among billboard ads for gentlemen's clubs and vasectomy reversal surgery, I noticed signs plugging ministers and large churches.
Never having had much desire to hang out in bars, (possible exception, Willie G's in Houston's Post Oak district), I spent most of my evening free time surfing through the cable TV offerings in my room. When CNN and MSNBC had been once through their offerings and begun to repeat stories, I scrolled through the other networks and discovered something I thought to be bizarre. Of the thirty or so channels available, nine were devoted entirely to religious Christian programming. There were fire-and-brimstone shouting preachers, quiet conversational preachers, flamboyantly dressed preachers in blue tuxedoes and preachers wearing Dockers and sport shirts. All had their choir, their stunningly beautiful wives (family values, you know) and their calls for donations to help spread their message of love/peace/salvation/Jesus/whatever. All played up-tempo modern music; some even played Christian rock.
Then, on the half hour when secular stations run four minutes of advertising, the Christian ones began their own ads. "Are you seeking spiritual guidance in these troubling times? Tune in to Reverend Doctor James Something-or-Other." Another featured an attractive white family enthusiastically praising the First Holy Roller Church of Christ the Savior or some such fanciful name. Each family member, including the cute eight year-old, told how spiritual and loving and invigorated in Christ's word they felt since joining the Reverend So-and-so at FHRCCS. Clips of the facilities at FHRCCS ran behind them, showing the gym, the playground, tennis courts and packed auditorium where Reverend So-and-so and his lovely wife led the several hundred members in enthusiastic song praising Jesus. Meanwhile, the 800- telephone number flashed at the bottom of the screen. The pitch finished up by urging viewers to call today and join the fastest growing congregation in the area. Not only is religion big business in Houston, but it seems to be a bit competitive as well, notwithstanding the whining from the political Christian right about being persecuted.
More recently, I attended church services in the small town of Greenwich in rural upstate New York. These services were held in huge, beautiful stone or brick churches built in the 1800s with tall steeples covered with slate tiles. Elaborately carved arches support ceilings thirty feet high; stained glass windows light the meeting halls, each able to easily seat two hundred or more worshipers. These architectural wonders were built in a time when the mills along the Battenkill River competed with the area's many large farms for workers. It was a prosperous time in the town's history.
Today the farms and elaborate church buildings remain, but most of the mills have long since shut down. Tiny congregations numbering in the low double digits struggle to maintain their individual legacy buildings while also paying the minister and "doing the Lord's work" contributing to local charities and the requisite national organization and international missionary aid. They are universally losing the struggle as their mostly elderly congregations dwindle.
It strikes me that the small town churches are analogous to the corner grocery stores of a bygone time. They each maintain a proud tradition, keeping the rituals that distinguish them in a small way from the other denominations. Like the small corner grocery, they keep a little of this and a little of that and hope, usually in vain, to retain loyal customers through their proximity.
But Hannaford's and Wal-Mart inexorably shut down the neighborhood stores. Are small town churches likewise doomed to the encroaching supermarket churches of the Swaggerts (yes, that creep is still going strong) and Osteens? What must they do to survive? Consolidation seems the logical path, but will their history and the pride they take in that history allow it? (What did Jesus say about pride?) A few years ago, Greenwich protestants began combining services in summer, rotating weekly from church to church. This first step may lead to more extensive ones, but the arguments against it from national denominational organizations as well as local historical societies will be intense. How the arguments play out will have a huge effect on the religious community, not just of Greenwich, but, I suspect, of small towns throughout the country.
And what are the political implications of the demise of small churches? Religious activism in politics is surely more likely when 2,000 like-minded people gather at least once a week to hear a powerful speaker. And only powerful speakers have a following of thousands. It's no coincidence that the influence of the religious right has coincided with the swell in the size of individual churches.
As J. Cash once sang, "If you ever go to Houston, boy, you better walk right."




Comments: 35
I wonder what the Puritans would have thought.
I suspected a few years ago they got a Hawaii vacation from dragging in the most visitors, since everywhere I went someone tried to strong arm me into 'visiting'.
All kidding aside, what I truly believe they 'get' is a sad sense of having thirty thousand phoney friends who will support any bigoted idea they come up with.
The highest praise I can offer is...I have had the same thoughts, and as soon as I read it, I wished that I had written it!
Sandy's comments pretty much cover any comments that I would have made if I had seen this earlier.
Here's about all I can think of to add:
If you think about how religions are "marketed" in the rest of the world, and contrast that to what is happening here, it seems to me that the American approach to religion has become the same as the American approach to business. Mass marketing, relentless promotion of images that generate "sales." We're the experts when it comes to capitalism. Isn't this just capitalism applied to religion? The "businesses" are the churches, and the profits that they are accumulating tax-free are being used to advance a political agenda. Just like big oil...or the mining or lumbering interests.
There is no difference. Their aim is to promote their agenda, whether it involves the exploitation of the land or the advancement of Christian dogma. Religion is business, and like everything else in this country, the most successful businesses are BIG!
Competeting business merged and played take over
The lagest corporations are now "larger" by value than many countries.
Why not the churches?
Oh my I don't even want to think about it
lil ole godless me.
This is an observant and well written article.
But, while we poke fun at the megas, they have a huge potential for mischief.
George, I'm intrigued by your comment about the 20th Century being an anomaly in the way religious leaders were perceived. And you are right about the level of religious education in America, despite the huge numbers who claim to be religious. Everyone who wants to call himherself a Christian should have to read "Misquoting Jesus" by Bart Ehrman before they're allowed to do so.
It would help if they would just read the Bible...and understand it. Then maybe they would take notice when their religious leaders misquote or misapply it.
John, what ever happened to "Judge not lest ye be judged"?
My suggestion would be to appreciate the fact that people actually profess a belief in God and peace and go to church at all, as opposed to the many who do not. After all, the Islamic terrorists are showing the world what happens when fundamentalism takes over.
That's exactly the point of reading Ehrman's book: understanding the bible as a book put together and copied hundreds of times over by all too fallible scribes often with their own agenda. Taken as a literal, historical, supernatural set of laws, it's subject to subversion by any ambitious power grabber.
Simply professing belief in God and peace is no more beneficial than going to a political rally, any political rally, with any message. You want examples? History is full of them - the Crusades, the Inquisition, Rev Jim Jones, David Koresh etc, etc. Your own comment: terrorists profess a belief in god, and the standard Arabic greeting "Salam Alaykum" means roughly "Peace be with you". Religion is too easily turned to evil purposes to take your attitude, which is a platitude that's been used to excuse horrors.
I don't see how I made your point. "Judge not lest ye be judged." You cannot be saying that that means we may not distinguish between evil and good. You cannot believe that that means we must not condemn evil, even when it is done in the name of some "god". In that case, maybe I don't know what your point is.
If I have an ability to reason and I am able to distinguish between good and evil (to "judge" evil), then should I not do so?
My point was that we should be glad for those of whatever religious pursuasion who honestly believe in good, in love, in peace, and in the freedom to pursue those ideals, rather than condemning those whose viewpoint differs from our own.
That said, I have to agree with your point, and I admit to sitting in judgement myself on those who would disrupt civilization and deny by death those who do not adopt their radical agendas the right to pursue their own peaceful ends. That is definitely evil.
Unfortunately, as long as we as a world society continue to restrain the victims and coddle the agressors (read: Israel and Hezbollah), we are failing to provide a disincentive to disruptive and murderous behavior.
Loosely translated, I hope Israel kicks their collective asses.
OK, I gotcha. and I totally agree re Hezbollah. BUT - until the entire Muslim world decides to take back their hijacked religion, I'm afraid the sane world is doomed.
"That's exactly the point of reading Ehrman's book: understanding the bible as a book put together and copied hundreds of times over by all too fallible scribes often with their own agenda."
Quite true; IF there is no God.
The behavior of the american people as a whole have changed dramatically from the 50s -60s to this century. The media has made the world a much smaller place where the conflicts of distant lands can now easily excite emotion in the smallest of rural america virtually within minutes of an event. Travel is so much simpler today, commuting 60 miles to work more common than not, extra curricular interest abound, availability of prepared food 24x7 diminishes the need for setting down to 2-3 family meals per day. Life is very different. Jeez-200+ tv channels 24x7!
So with all the changes to societal behaviors, why be alarmed that large congregational churches exist and flourish? The elements which provided strength and loyalty to the local family church have perhaps eroded or been replaced by different lifestyles.
As lifestyles change, so must the service offerings of the small church to compete for a slice of time from their congregation. I'll bet that successful small churches have altered their methods of integration into their community and support sports, special interests groups, and other social programs... as opposed to competing with them.
Also I am not sure americans as a whole "feel" the obligation at least socially, to be seen in church or face accountability in their community later in the week. Thus the anonymity of a large congregational church can be a benefit for some.
And finally, I truly don't believe that church attendance any longer represents a measure of what americans may feel in their heart. Just a measure of their willingness to make their beliefs public.
I remember going to a large church for an Easter Play/pageant/spectacle one year. It was huge. It was a full stage show with dance numbers and solos and live animals. At the end, they locked the doors so that people couldn't leave until after the call to come forward to be saved. I found it very disturbing.
The problem I see with the mega churches the potential for political mischief which doesn't exist with the small congregations.