It's only Tuesday, and already a heavy week for prayer requests. I've been asked to pray for a dead woman, for a couple of people going to surgery, for a favorable outcome in a competition, for love, and for a third party I don't know, with details of the specific outcome the second party wants me to request for the third.
It doesn't matter that I have said I would feel presumptuous or ridiculous praying for most of what they request, and would prefer they didn't ask. Prayer requesters assume the right to disregard my beliefs, and to decide for me and everyone else what, how, and when we should pray.
I started asking questions at the age of seven. The list grows over time, and so far, no one has provided reasonable answers to any of them. I'm assuming, from the looks on the faces of those I ask, they probably run out to ask their other friends to pray for my confusion.
· Why would any god listen to me over the person I am praying for?
· Why would an all-knowing god require groveling, or my direction, before bestowing his graces?
· Why aren't the prayers of one person enough?
· Is this really a popularity contest, where the person with the most praying friends receives the most gifts?
· If this is a popularity contest, should I worry less about living a good life and more about making the right friends?
· Will my afterlife change, depending on how many of those left behind continue to pray for me?
· If so, is there no need for me to lead a good life so long as I leave behind people who will pray for me?
· I believe there are many things worse than death, so when people ask me to pray for sick friends to recover, will they be offended if I pray for them to die instead?
· Does the team with the most prayers always win?
· Should I pray for doctors to do their jobs well, or patients to accept treatment and comply with the doctors orders, or for a god to control the outcome?
As an afterthought, possibly related, I'd prefer to see bumper stickers that say 'Smile, I Love You' because that infers personal responsibility and dedication.


Comments: 70
I believe in randomness. I envy those who think their prayers will be answered, for they must be comforted by this.
It's so politically incorrect to say you don't believe in god (I did NOT say that), but it's just fine to assume that others beliefs are the same as yours.
I'll probably lose half my connections over this one.
However, I know in India they believe that group prayer is more effective than individual prayer because your voice is louder and it stands out in the multitude of voices that God hears all the time. Whenever there's a drought, the whole community prays together, in little clusters if they're different religions, but still for the same thing. I'm not sure if it works any better than individual prayer but I know that's what they do.
The e-mailed requests bother me the most: I don't think forwarding eighty e-mails within 5 minutes accomplishes anything -- even if there's a pretty picture or a moving cookie attached.
We have different religious beliefs, as they are much more conservative than I am. As long as the right to have a different belief is respected, I don't have an issue with a request. I can then decide myself whether I choose to accept it or not.
Religious beliefs are very personal to me, and I don't like anybody telling me what I should or should not believe or that I'll go to hell because I don't go to church. It's a personal choice.
I believe in the power of intention, to have good will toward the world as a whole in sending good vibes, thoughts, from myself out to all.
It means that I have to be at peace and love the world.
i did have an occasion where i was familiar with the situation of a young man lost in the woods, about few hundred acres of forest at night and I did wish for him to have light , and I was thinking about him all night, when he emerged somehow the next day he said that at one point a metheor light up the skies and burst in all kinds of colors and he decided to stop and spend the night there.
Coincidence I suppose but a good one.
Prayer is an individual preference. I believe that God listens to each and every person who prays. However, I don't believe in praying to win a competition or for someone who has already died. It is too late after they've passed into the hereafter. Prayer should be selective and people should remember to be careful for what they pray for. Their prayers may come true.
I pray for everybody in the world.
AMEN
Does that cover it?
SF
PS: Just FYI, my name is spelt "Stephen Frug".
EB, your comment is hysterical.
Your comment about the bumper sticker echos something I've been saying for years. Indeed I would love to see a lot more personal responsibility and love between all people.
Now, given that, I believe that there are certain situations where a request for good vibes are appropriate - for example, if I'm worried about a particular thing, like a job or a tough situation I'm going through, I will send a generic request for positive mojo to come my way. However, I wouldn't expect said mojo to come from strangers, and I wouldn't ask for it from them.
I don't know - I'm torn. If I get a prayer request, I'll usually send a quick positive thought in their direction. I do, however, find it a little offputting when I get the mass e-mails asking me to pray for this that or whoever's operation, illness, or competition.
Damian's point about being able to pray any time any where is one I preach often when people misconstrue the 'prayer in school' issue. No one that I know of has asked anyone not to pray, they've only asked that they not ask everyone else to pray with them, listen to them, stop and bow their heads while they pray, or in any way participate. Prayer can and should be private, in my opinion.
First, I absolutely love what John A. said -- beautifully stated and very much what I would have attempted to say, so, thanks, John!
Secondly, I'd expand on the idea of the God image. As a child, I was shown humanoid, grandfatherly images of God and those were friendly, familiar images to get me started on the God concept.
As I matured, however, those images no longer suited my concept of a being capable of creating all the wonders around us.
Additionally, there was an element of God that could allow "evil" to exist/happen, and I realized much of my definition of "evil" was based upon viewpoint. A forest fire that consumes millions of acres could be an evil, if caused by a careless tourist or even a malicious arsonist. When I was younger, my heart would break over a forest fire.
As I got older and learned more science, I came to understand the earth-cleansing properties of fire, and I came to witness firsthand (down on Long Island and on Hawaii) the astonishing regrowth that takes place in the wake of such a fire. Instead of an ending, the fire was a renewal of the forest. From a God's-eye view, there was no evil in the picture, just the steady changing flow of earth processes. (This did not arouse any sympathy for stupid tourists, however.)
By the time I was raising boys, I'd explain that God was not limited by human form the way we are, and thus 'being made in his image' was more about *our* being created just as God wanted us to be, not by us defining him. (hope I'm making sense...)
The God I understood was too vast for a small human mind to grasp, ever. I'd tell the boys God was both bigger than the hugest concept they could ever imagine and smaller than the smallest, because our minds and imaginations were limited, but God was not.
And to bring this back to prayer, I would echo Sandy -- that we are all a part of something larger and our positive energy, goodwill, and compassion are never lost or wasted unless we refuse to express them for others.
A co-worker has a bumper sticker that reads "A candle loses nothing by lighting another candle."
Cheryl, I truly appreciate yours because I now how different our beliefs are.
Dannielle, I used that candle quote as my email signature line for many years. Thank you for taking time out of the
Libraryathon to come back and leave such a thoughtful comment.
HO'OPONOPONO
by Joe Vitale
"Two years ago, I heard about a therapist in Hawaii who cured a complete ward of criminally insane patients--without ever seeing any of them. The psychologist would study an inmate's chart and then look within himself to see how he created that person's illness. As he
improved himself, the patient improved.
"When I first heard this story, I thought it was an urban legend. How could anyone heal anyone else by healing himself? How could even the best self-improvement master cure the criminally insane? It didn't
make any sense. It wasn't logical, so I dismissed the story.
"However, I heard it again a year later. I heard that the therapist had used a Hawaiian healing process called ho 'oponopono. I had never heard of it, yet I couldn't let it leave my mind. If the story was at all true, I had to know more. I had always understood "total
responsibility" to mean that I am responsible for what I think and do. Beyond that, it's out of my hands. I think that most people think of total responsibility that way. We're responsible for what we do, not what anyone else does--but that's wrong.
"The Hawaiian therapist who healed those mentally ill people wouldteach me an advanced new perspective about total responsibility. His name is Dr. Ihaleakala Hew Len. We probably spent an hour talking on our first phone call. I asked him to tell me the complete story of his
work as a therapist.
He explained that he worked at Hawaii State Hospital for four years. That ward where they kept the criminally insane was dangerous.
Psychologists quit on a monthly basis. The staff called in sick a lotor simply quit. People would walk through that ward with their backs against the wall, afraid of being attacked by patients. It was not a pleasant place to live, work, or visit.
"Dr. Len told me that he never saw patients. He agreed to have an office and to review their files. While he looked at those files, he would work on himself. As he worked on himself, patients began to heal.
"'After a few months, patients that had to be shackled were being allowed to walk freely,' he told me. 'Others who had to be heavily medicated were getting off their medications. And those who had no chance of ever being released were being freed.' I was in awe.'Not only that,' he went on, 'but the staff began to enjoy coming to work.
Absenteeism and turnover disappeared. We ended up with more staff than we needed because patients were being released, and all the staff was showing up to work. Today, that ward is closed.'
"This is where I had to ask the million dollar question: 'What were you doing within yourself that caused those people to change?'
"'I was simply healing the part of me that created them,' he said. I didn't understand. Dr. Len explained that total responsibility foryour life means that everything in your life- simply because it is in your life--is your responsibility. In a literal sense the entire world is your creation.
"Whew. This is tough to swallow. Being responsible for what I say or do is one thing. Being responsible for what everyone in my life says or does is quite another. Yet, the truth is this: if you take complete responsibility for your life, then everything you see, hear, taste, touch, or in any way experience is your responsibility because it is
in your life. This means that terrorist activity, the president, the economy or anything you experience and don't like--is up for you to heal. They don't exist, in a manner of speaking, except as projections from inside you. The problem isn't with them, it's with you, and to
change them, you have to change you.
"I know this is tough to grasp, let alone accept or actually live. Blame is far easier than total responsibility, but as I spoke with Dr. Len, I began to realize that healing for him and in ho 'oponopono means loving yourself.
"If you want to improve your life, you have to heal your life. If you want to cure anyone, even a mentally ill criminal you do it by healing you.
"I asked Dr. Len how he went about healing himself. What was he doing, exactly, when he looked at those patients' files?
"'I just kept saying, 'I'm sorry' and 'I love you' over and over again,' he explained.
"That's it?
"That's it.
"Turns out that loving yourself is the greatest way to improve yourself, and as you improve yourself, you improve your world.
"Let me give you a quick example of how this works: one day, someone sent me an email that upset me. In the past I would have handled it by working on my emotional hot buttons or by trying to reason with the person who sent the nasty message.
"This time, I decided to try Dr. Len's method. I kept silently saying, 'I'm sorry' and 'I love you,' I didn't say it to anyone in particular.
I was simply evoking the spirit of love to heal within me what was creating the outer circumstance.
"Within an hour I got an e-mail from the same person. He apologized for his previous message. Keep in mind that I didn't take any outward action to get that apology. I didn't even write him back. Yet, by saying 'I love you,' I somehow healed within me what was creating him.
"I later attended a ho 'oponopono workshop run by Dr. Len. He's now 70 years old, considered a grandfatherly shaman, and is somewhat reclusive.
He praised my book, The Attractor Factor. He told me that as I improve myself, my book's vibration will raise, and everyone will feel it when they read it. In short, as I improve, my readers will improve.
"'What about the books that are already sold and out there?' I asked.
"'They aren't out there,' he explained, once again blowing my mind with his mystic wisdom. 'They are still in you.' In short, there is no out there. It would take a whole book to explain this advanced technique with the depth it deserves.
"Suffice It to say that whenever you want to improve anything in your life, there's only one place to look: inside you. When you look, do itwith love."
As I mentioned at the beginning of this thread, I envy those with strong beliefs; it helps them get thru some very trying times.
I just don't share the beliefs. And that's okay, too.
The request to pray for someone often has a "strings attached" feeling, and I dislike that.
And the email thing - UGH. If little Johnny needs my prayers and for me to send the email to 17 friends, and around the world 23 times, then he better hang it up right now, cause I ain't gunna do it!
May you (all beings) be well and happy.
May you (all beings) be free from anger.
May you (all beings) be free from suffering.
Amen.
It reminds me of something my psycholgist once told me. He said "If we know about something, we become responsible for it". I think I was struggling at the time with the horror going on in Bosnia, and I said I couldn't stand it that there was such cruelty, and I could not fix it.
Then I started thinking that I didn't want to know these things. Ignorance is bliss, and all that. But he just laughed and said "But you do know".
So how am I responsible? What can I do? Send money? Say prayers? Go to Bosnia and kill bad guys?
I decided that all I can do is be as good a person as it is possible for me to be, to help when I can, to do no harm, as is said in Wicca, and to be the best "me" that there is.
Lisa, it makes sense to me. Your private thought prayer is probably the same as what I consider sending positive energy into the world.
And I'm still thinking about Jan's comment ;-)
Thought provoking topic, and what a thread! So very much to think about.
I personally offer to keep people "in my thoughts" rather than to pray for them. (Perhaps too many forced novenas in my youth....)
For me, that more often than not entails positive thoughts or wishes that the recipient will be able to draw from their own strength to deal with whatever the future holds.
I do believe in the power of positive energy and that well wishes and comfort can help from a distance though.
What I don't believe in is going through the motions of prayer without sincerity.
Prayer is not for God but for us - its very essence is INCLUSION and ACCEPTANCE of those we think of being, 'others' - others implies separation and distance. Prayer helps close the gap in our own awareness and experience.
Or so I believe.
Magi
Everyone else -- I'd love to hear more reactions to the piece I wrote (which Sandy links to right at the start of his), if anyone has any. I'm going to post a group reply to the comments I've gotten thus far, but I would love some more perspectives before I do so...
I can remember being 5 and in sunday school and thinking, "What a load of crap. Loaves and fishes, walking on water, noah's ark, do people really believe this stuff?"
Even then and all the way through forced confirmation, questions like the ones you've outlined above popped into my mind. Many people find church a relaxing experience, but my logical mind can't help reading the bible verse they are speaking about and analyzing how people in the 21st century put so much stock into a book written so long ago.
My favorite quote comes from Homer Simpson, when he is discussing Jews and older religions. He says, "Thank God we've come to our senses and worship a carpenter that lived 2000 years ago." Makes me laugh every time.
I'll attempt to answer some of your questions for you:
You see, heaven, just like every other place, requires a form of government to run 'efficiently'. And prayers are the currency upon which that government is run. And just like, for example, our government, s/he who has the most currency is first in line for all the perks!
As to the notion that your prayers are worth less than somebody else's who is, say, more pious than you, I say pshaw! It's currency. It doesn't matter where it came from or how it was obtained. All that matters is havin' it!
Nobody told you? God is a Republican.
amen
I totally agree. I believe strongly in universal knowledge, and that we can tap into that collection as long as we have contributed as much as we intend to take back out.
The problem with that is when one tries to share (contribute) understanding of the Universal Mind, one is castigated, vilified and preached at. Evidently, there is only one acceptable Thought, and it sure as hell cannot be the one that denies the existence of an anthorpomorphic deity.