I saw this today and wanted to share it with you all (below). Perhaps you read it in the paper...I think this is taking it a bit too far. What if they were treated well after caught and then the people who bought them by the pound decided to torture them so they died
s l o w l y
?
=============================================
Sellers shrug at lobster ban
Decision by Whole Foods is a 'PR move,' chef says
By Kim-Mai Cutler and Joe Yonan, Globe Correspondent And Globe Staff | June 17, 2006
A day after Whole Foods Market stopped the sale of live lobsters in its stores, local chefs and wholesalers brushed off worries that New England's iconic crustacean would go the way of fur or foie gras.
The upscale natural foods chain said that lobsters are not treated humanely enough en route from the boat to the dinner plate. The company said for now it would only sell frozen lobster products that meet standards for humane treatment.
Chef Jasper White, whose four Summer Shack restaurants sell $4 million to $5 million worth of lobster each year, called the decision ``pure silliness" and a ``PR move" to appease animal-rights activists. Some 10,000 families in New England and maritime Canada depend on lobstering for income, he says, and Whole Foods should be more concerned about them than about an animal that he called ``basically an insect."
``People first, lobsters second," White said. ``Lobsters are for dinner."
Locals scoffed at Whole Foods' ban, saying the decision would barely make a dent in sales. Over at downtown wholesaler James Hook & Co., business was brisk yesterday as customers streamed in and out of the store buying lobsters for Father's Day. Near the display window, a large tank housed dozens of the critters, some as old as 40 or 50 years and weighing up to 15 pounds.
``We've been doing this for hundreds of years, and the world is supposed to jump up and take notice if Whole Foods stops selling lobsters? They can march to the beat of their own drum," said Eddie Hook, whose family has run the business for 80 years.
Whole Foods said it performed an eight-month review, testing everything from lobster ``condos" to specially designed holding crates to see whether there were more ethical ways of treating the animals, which sometimes stay in storage for months before being sold.
``This is about quality of life," said Margaret Wittenberg, vice president of quality standards for the Austin-based chain, noting that long before it turned its attention to lobster, Whole Foods applied the same standards to meat and poultry. ``Whether it's you, me, a dog, a cat, sheep, cow, or lobster, it's about giving them the ability to express their normal behavior, to really support who they are as a creature. It's the right thing to do." Whole Foods would not disclose its revenue from lobster sales.
The decision comes about a month after Safeway Inc. said it would phase out lobster tanks because the ``business was in decline."
That isn't the case in New England, the heart of the country's industry. Last year, fishermen caught nearly 12 million pounds in Massachusetts, worth more than $52 million before any mark-up. In Maine, the biggest lobster-fishing state in the country, lobstermen caught more than 65 million pounds in a record-breaking year in dollar terms.
During the peak season in the summer, lobsters can stay in storage for as little for a few days. But to keep prices even throughout the year, lobstermen often hold the animals for months before releasing them onto the market.
``They're taken from the ocean and kept for months. Then they end up in grocery tanks and stew in their own excrement. Their claws are banded, not just to protect people but because it's so stressful for them that they end up attacking each other. It's sadistic cruelty," said Matt Prescott, a spokesman for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, which runs a Lobster Liberation campaign.
The European Food Safety Authority recently concluded that lobsters and crabs have ``a pain system and considerable learning ability," in a finding that led to Whole Foods' decision.
But some marine biologists don't see it that way. Professor Jelle Atema, director of the Boston University Marine Program, said he has seen no evidence that a lobster feels anything akin to pain.
Whole Foods had started developing standards for humane cooking of lobster -- calling for customers to freeze them first to avoid causing any possible pain. But some customers, like Jean Piantedosi O'Brien who was shopping at James Hook, don't see the need to go through that trouble.
``If they ban the lobsters, what's next?" she said, ``I boil them and I'll eat them until the day I die."
Sellers shrug at lobster ban
Decision by Whole Foods is a 'PR move,' chef says
By Kim-Mai Cutler and Joe Yonan, Globe Correspondent And Globe Staff | June 17, 2006
A day after Whole Foods Market stopped the sale of live lobsters in its stores, local chefs and wholesalers brushed off worries that New England's iconic crustacean would go the way of fur or foie gras.
The upscale natural foods chain said that lobsters are not treated humanely enough en route from the boat to the dinner plate. The company said for now it would only sell frozen lobster products that meet standards for humane treatment.
Chef Jasper White, whose four Summer Shack restaurants sell $4 million to $5 million worth of lobster each year, called the decision ``pure silliness" and a ``PR move" to appease animal-rights activists. Some 10,000 families in New England and maritime Canada depend on lobstering for income, he says, and Whole Foods should be more concerned about them than about an animal that he called ``basically an insect."
``People first, lobsters second," White said. ``Lobsters are for dinner."
Locals scoffed at Whole Foods' ban, saying the decision would barely make a dent in sales. Over at downtown wholesaler James Hook & Co., business was brisk yesterday as customers streamed in and out of the store buying lobsters for Father's Day. Near the display window, a large tank housed dozens of the critters, some as old as 40 or 50 years and weighing up to 15 pounds.
``We've been doing this for hundreds of years, and the world is supposed to jump up and take notice if Whole Foods stops selling lobsters? They can march to the beat of their own drum," said Eddie Hook, whose family has run the business for 80 years.
Whole Foods said it performed an eight-month review, testing everything from lobster ``condos" to specially designed holding crates to see whether there were more ethical ways of treating the animals, which sometimes stay in storage for months before being sold.
``This is about quality of life," said Margaret Wittenberg, vice president of quality standards for the Austin-based chain, noting that long before it turned its attention to lobster, Whole Foods applied the same standards to meat and poultry. ``Whether it's you, me, a dog, a cat, sheep, cow, or lobster, it's about giving them the ability to express their normal behavior, to really support who they are as a creature. It's the right thing to do." Whole Foods would not disclose its revenue from lobster sales.
The decision comes about a month after Safeway Inc. said it would phase out lobster tanks because the ``business was in decline."
That isn't the case in New England, the heart of the country's industry. Last year, fishermen caught nearly 12 million pounds in Massachusetts, worth more than $52 million before any mark-up. In Maine, the biggest lobster-fishing state in the country, lobstermen caught more than 65 million pounds in a record-breaking year in dollar terms.
During the peak season in the summer, lobsters can stay in storage for as little for a few days. But to keep prices even throughout the year, lobstermen often hold the animals for months before releasing them onto the market.
``They're taken from the ocean and kept for months. Then they end up in grocery tanks and stew in their own excrement. Their claws are banded, not just to protect people but because it's so stressful for them that they end up attacking each other. It's sadistic cruelty," said Matt Prescott, a spokesman for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, which runs a Lobster Liberation campaign.
The European Food Safety Authority recently concluded that lobsters and crabs have ``a pain system and considerable learning ability," in a finding that led to Whole Foods' decision.
But some marine biologists don't see it that way. Professor Jelle Atema, director of the Boston University Marine Program, said he has seen no evidence that a lobster feels anything akin to pain.
Whole Foods had started developing standards for humane cooking of lobster -- calling for customers to freeze them first to avoid causing any possible pain. But some customers, like Jean Piantedosi O'Brien who was shopping at James Hook, don't see the need to go through that trouble.
``If they ban the lobsters, what's next?" she said, ``I boil them and I'll eat them until the day I die."


Comments: 26
Someone needs to remind us that we have a choice.
But why are lobsters so special? Don't shrimp, fish, snails, and all of the fuzzy animals have feelings too.
The reason I think it's silly is because we're going to KILL them anyway. Does it matter how they are treated on Death Row if they are dead to us the minute we pull them out of the ocean?
My husband said to me: "First food for slaves coming over chained in ships, and now pets" Funny you mention slaves in an article about lobster!! :)
Today in Whole Paycheck I spent $40 and got some really great stuff. The man in the meat section acted like the ones in Stop & Shop...so I was shocked. I just wanted a pound of steak and he did not even understand and kept grabbing steaks that were over a pound. *sigh* If I had asked him if the cow was treated well, if it got to smile at the sunlight...before it was killed...he may say "sure all of our cow is treated well. then the farmer has one of those butcher-on-wheels come by and kill the cow so he does not have to see the blood"
Do lobsters really scream when they hit the water? Because if I was a lobster I would not go quietly into the night. I know some people believe it's the shells with air in them.
I think Lobsters are upset they don't get to wallow in their own waste at Whole Foods instead of S&S. Goodness knows I'd bask in the fresh, healthy water on Death Row before the dirty S&S water. :)
Animals are people too...but lobsters are kinda bug-like. :)
We are intelligent human beings, and we consider ourselves humane. Thus, while yes, we kill them to eat, this does not mean we need to make them suffer while they are alive.
I am not asking people to give up meat or seafood. I won't. But I do expect humanity .........
This is why I no longer eat veal. Do you know what veal is? Baby cows are put in small "cells", are allowed no daylight, are not allowed to move about, thus never developing any muscle (toughness). When they reach the correct weight they are slaughtered. I do not consider this humane.
My point is that we are carnivores, but we do not have to be ruthless.
I was just reading an article about this in Yoga Journal - it called for yogis to be "conscious carnivores" if they do choose to eat meat - I personally don't eat meat, but I do eat seafood, and while I have found myself eating lobster occasionally (once in Maine - YUM!!!), the minute I see that tank overloaded with them, I walk away. I just can't bring myself to eat it.
Anyway, I'm hoping that those who do choose to eat lobster will contribute to a cause
Yep I know all about veal and I prefer Elk anyway...I never have been able to eat veal or baby lamb. (hence the sheep icon)
The way cow and sheep are tended to in Iceland is amazing. All that fresh air and fresh water...and plenty of room. The way we treat our livestock in America often sucks.
Yes the over-fishing is a huge huge problem! So yet Whole Paycheck still buys all that fish!!
The whole tank thing has always freaked me out. All of those sad eyes. I hate to see Farm animals in this area (or any area) treated wrong. I understand that farms don't often name the animals because "you don't name your food" I remember on one episode of Wife Swap (perhaps the only episode I ever saw) where their pet turkey got run over by a truck and they cooked 'er up and ate it.
I love meat, but I love veggies more. Veggies at my house are a labor of love, we can them and eat them year-round. Nothing is more rewarding than growing your own veggies. I imagine growing your own meat is rewarding too. I just really like to know where my food comes from.
after a long spell in the tank
so true! Anything is like that...like the beef that comes on rail cars from Texas fed only oats (which gives them a tummy ache)...cows were not designed to eat oats so by the time they get to the East Coast slaughter house they must be like "kill me now!" Can you imagine that rail ride cross country with nothing to eat but the stuff you hate the most?
Like others above, I do draw the line between mammals and crustaceans (forgive me on the spelling there). Veal is one thing, but lobster, what's next, , not eating vegetables because we are killing a "life force"?
I agree! Plus, there's good honest folks from Maine, MA, Nova Scotia etc. that make a good hard honest living off these things!
With companies like MBNA pulling out of Maine pretty much Lobster remains a good hard honest way to make a living. I used to work with a high powered executive who had a husband who is a lobster fisherman. I spend so much time in Maine...I feel strongly for those people.
And yes, Katrina, as I go out to pick the strawberries this morning they will scream "no, don't pick me, for I am the berry of the yard!"
Nice! Good for you being in Maine. :) LOVE Maine.