Prisons are reflective of a system that promotes arrogance in a very brutal way towards the powerless ones. Approximately 2 million in chains, while a substantial amount of people are subjected to parole, probation or some form of judicial supervision. The restraints are being applied by white males to an overwhelming population of color, without traditional safeguards or professional standards. There was a recent incident in New York City, in which a person was shot at 41 times by law enforcement personnel because he looked like a typical suspect, another black youth in the city.
A correctional officer, about 20 years old, was monitoring the flow of prisoners entering and exiting the chow hall. He motioned towards an older lifer to step out of line and empty his pockets for a pat search. As the handkerchief, an ID card and a comb was being placed on the desk top, the guard appeared disinterested and began moving away from the area. "What is it? Did you not want to search these items?" inquired the prisoner. The guard continued to ignore him until the voice was right there vibrating the eardrum. "Then why did you stop me?" The response came with textbook clarity. "Because I can do anything I want to you."
This attitude is not solely instilled at the training academy for prison guards. What about the appellate judge who, while considering constitution violations of due process and equal protection, questions the guilt or innocence of the defendant. The message is that, regardless of trial or tactical errors, the most significant issue is to have the (guilty) right person in the cell.
In the last 12 decisions by the Massachusetts Parole Board of lifers at Bay State prison, only one was (partially) successful. The individual was granted conditional parole to a long term intensive substance-abuse program. The other eleven men were denied parole review for up to 5 years and have served from 15 to 26 years in the prison system. They are not serial killers or mass murderers. Some had limited participation in the actual crime and were first-time offenders. They have completed college degree programs, worked with troubled teenagers and have maintained networks with families and friends.
So why would the Massachusetts Parole Board, made up of an ex-federal agent and former prosecutors, reject the bids of accomplished men?
Just because they can ….


Comments: 2