And by the way, Abraham did not sacrifice his son on the mountain. The point of this passage of scripture that Dan Merritt makes mention of (Genesis 22:1-19) is about Abraham's devotion to God. A devotion to God that is so complete that Abraham would not even hold back from God that which he valued so much, his own son. When God realized that Abraham was willing, then He provided a ram to take the place of Isaac.
Genesis 22:11-12
But the Angel of the LORD called to him from heaven and said, "Abraham, Abraham!"
So he said, "Here I am."
And He said, "Do not lay your hand on the lad, or do anything to him; for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me."
Genesis 22:11-12
But the Angel of the LORD called to him from heaven and said, "Abraham, Abraham!"
So he said, "Here I am."
And He said, "Do not lay your hand on the lad, or do anything to him; for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me."
I am well aware of the bible story believe me and well aware the he did not actually sacrfice Issac, but apparently this very dangerous man, this lunatic, was actually going to do so until 'God' told him otherwise! And we are to take this kind of unthinking devotion to voices in your head as a good thing? All I can say is it seems to me that Issac was mighty lucky his paranoid schizophrenic father changed his mind in time.
Oh I know many people who interpret the story as you do, but since I was 7 or 8 years old I have never figured out nor heard any rational explaination of why doing such a vile act could be considered a good thing. And I must say that any God that would order such a thing and then reward his follower for being willing to carry it out is not a God I want counselling my country's leaders. We have quite enough of that sort of unthinking willingness to be cruel and viscious 'in god's name' stuff coming from the other side of this current conflict. If your god isn't better than that please leave him home.
0


Comments: 10
The point I would make, and that I think Dan would agree with is not so much that Abraham was willing to sacrifice his son to an "almighty god," but that the same mindless theological beliefs are rampant today, 4000 years later! John's point is well taken, but why are we still celebrating those things which happend so long a go and were in a better context with people who lived then than with people who live now?
Had Abraham or someone like him performed that act of attempted murder, abduction, and assault today, even though the son was not killed, he would be put away in prison or in a hospital for the criminally insane, as should be the case.
My personal feeling is that the Biblical story, like all the other stories in holy books of all religions, is allegorical. These stories are myths to teach us spiritual truths (truths within that particular religion, mind you).
I am not trying to condem Abraham. In all likelyhood if such a person ever actually existed and he were around today he would be flabergasted at this riduculous story being told about him. What I am condemning is the mindset that says his willngness to do this despicable act was a 'good thing'. And that is not occurring 4000 years ago, it is occuring right now.
Take or leave it, the bible and its moral codes are shot through our daily lives, government and personal relations. The roots are deep. Perhaps someday we will mature enough to achieve an Aristole-like humanism, but don't hold your breath.
you are free to accept or reject God. You are free to believe or not believe the Holy Bible.
I won't hold your choice against you. Please don't persecute me or hold my choice against me. But please allow me the free expression of my faith, for my faith in God is not just what I believe. It is a part of who I am.
I don't know what kind of experiences you have had with other Christians or religious people. Being a minister's wife, I have met some Christians that would turn anybody away from the Christian faith. I have met some Christians who didn't act very Christian at all.
I don't want to beat people over the head with my faith, but I do want the freedom to express and share it. I would hope that people would listen politely and indulgently to me, then go off and make up their own mind as to what they choose to believe.
I feel your article on this website is somewhat inappropriate, and is a personal attack on me for a simple comment that I made.
I don't wish to come to the defense of Abraham or God. The premise throughout the bible is God's continuing drive to purify his chosen people. Why send an entire generation of slaves to wander in the desert till they die and leave their children to achieve the promised land? Why deny Moses, a guy who went through quite a bit of trouble, entry into the promised land because he spoke to a rock and not strike it? (Or vs, I don't remember). A little harsh. But that is the structure of a faith which distains man's ability to profitalbly regiment his life and seeks to impose a moral and personal code that hinges on worship of a unchallangable God. You have to admit, we don't have a good track record of self-restraint. There is an obvious argument that mankind could profit from some moral code.
The absurdity of the story is manifest. Even if it's symbolic, it's symbolism is gruesome and rustic. I wonder why the Lord never knew that Abraham feared Him (a male God?) and was he playing mouse and cat with a person he made a prophet (if there is something like this)?