Black Holes

    A black hole is a whirling mass of dense light in space. It is a black hole because the aspects of space in space are named for recognition of them, when it is possible to recognize that there is something about a particular aspect that can be given a name. Therefore, if we agree recognizable aspects in space belong to the category: "the universe" and those of nature, such as the grass, trees, and stars, then it would also be to understand a category for the things that exist and show to us. Therefore, as well, a black hole is in a category that man has yet to understand all the things about, by which he can refer to the recognizable masses in space. Existence is something. Existence explained, or the explanation for existence, might be out in space really far away, so really it is its infinite possibilities for a value because of the black hole, instead of simply saying things we do not understand yet. The values can be diverse; such as really exist in the earthly world matter.

     When I see a black hole, I think of the inside of a skull in relation to a philosopher's mind, and then I see the two ears of his head. This seems to me to open the world of trying to locate a way of proving there is a use for the explanation and also for the explanation that all recognizable aspects in space are actually their distant relationship to something real and tangible on earth. For example, if we compressed the atmosphere on earth, we would have argon, carbon dioxide, oxygen, nitrogen, and other minuscule traces of gases. We do not see this very well, but considering it is like water and it is cold or warm, in order to see it, the next closest thing we can name is its weight. Therefore, the heavier a compressed substance is, the more we are able to imagine a vision of it, such as the weight of a celluloid. This makes the nature of the substance viscose. The viscosity helps us to imagine the place where the whirling mass of dense light is located. Also, the Doppler Effect tells us that things farther away and receding are red and things closer and getting closer are blue. The hue indicates the velocity of the light source. A shift in the hue indicates what direction the light source is moving, hence Doppler Shift. Inside the hole we can imagine a tunnel of astral colors where time travel is beyond the speed of light. The speed of light is infinite speed. Nothing is faster. Therefore, as nothing, a somewhere can have existence. The someplace of the speeding light reveals there is knowing light captures our picture of when we see things, being able to travel at great speeds has told us leaving these things is the astounding fact that things age away from distant points of travel. This is because, in arriving on a distant point in space by space travel, we have traveled faster than time on earth. This is because the Doppler Effect applies to all types of waves, including water, sound, and light waves. It can be understood as only the Doppler Effect, so it must approach or recede; however, in the case of the black hole, where, as I have said the density can refer to the conceptual relationship to tangible matter, the nothing is something called distance and the in-between is time. However, by traveling away from the object of earth, the speed is with respect to the observer who sees the ship becoming smaller.

     This considered, consider I have said "light captures our picture of when we see things" means sight. Because we covered the meaning for water, sound, and light waves, we must discern the light waves as either the ability to see or the light waves that we see. As the ability to see, we know sight with which to see. As the light waves that place tangible objects at distance or in motion, it is the comprehension of the sight, or of "light captures our picture of when we see things" (remember that sound waves are capturing our hearing when we hear things). Therefore, it is just as logical to say 'light captures our picture of when we see,' leaving out the word "things." Although the meaning for us is still selective, the point I am trying to make is the case for sight belongs clearly to the biological science in the universe and the case for light belongs to the science of physics in the universe. Given these are self encompassing, what is left to the imagination is whether or not to include tangibility of matter. From there, we would explore the other forms of existence, and, considering comprehension need not be one of the great things we need in leaving behind the element of assuredness of aptitudes, we can see existence of purpose. The mosaic is everything to see, know, and feel, but it is also here to shape. The black hole is whirling; it is dense light, which is energy. The sight of energy is an intriguing thought about a black hole. Then, I suppose, as the description of the density validates the viscose matter, we could also determine that the celluloid is like the eye's membrane and take a look into biology with the protean fact. By our parallax, we would of course learn what is harmful and what is beneficial. However, I was only intrigued here with illustration of the concept (or concepts) and whether, demonstrated, this too might reveal logic for the journey through the universe.

     It interests me to see the categories related to each special relatedness, when, in varying, they are used to say: