Tag: vanity press
|
February 02, 2008 01:00 PM EST --
It doesn't take long after the contests close with other winners, and the rejections for work come in from the commercial publishing pipeline, a slow boat even if you get on with a ticket, for the . . .
more
|
|
July 28, 2008 03:03 PM EDT --
I have watched with dismay over the years as the once trustworthy and noble Writer's Digest has become a thin shell of what it used to be. WD seems to have completely shunned . . .
more
|
|
February 11, 2008 04:02 PM EST --
Announcing the Gather vanity press!
After thousands of manuscripts were submitted for the various writing contests we've held, we knew we had to do something to help these unknown writers in . . .
more
|
|
February 09, 2008 12:31 PM EST --
A while back, I used Lulu.com to self-publish some collections of short stories. My experience there was quite smooth and without any problems. I know a lot of these print-on-demand places catch a lot . . .
more
|
|
January 16, 2008 10:42 AM EST --
I was standing in the kitchen last night, frying chicken, when my daughter walked in and told me that she was going to have a baby. I thought she was kidding. She handed me the stick that . . .
more
|
|
February 27, 2007 10:09 PM EST --
I kicked myself in the butt recently and dug around in the closet for a sturdy leather folder that holds a number . . .
more
|
|
June 29, 2008 03:31 PM EDT --
Some of you here at Gather must have used or are in the process of using a POD service. Getting published probably isn't as tough as getting an agent, because most publishers won't even . . .
more
|
|
February 23, 2007 11:26 PM EST --
Money goes FROM the publisher TO you, and never the other way around.
I can't say that often enough. Real publishers make their money from producing and selling quality books, not from charging "reading . . .
more
|
|
September 24, 2008 07:53 PM EDT --
First, let's talk about Vanity Presses. Used to be a stigma attached to Vanity Press --probably there still is. The idea being you couldn't find a publisher but you think your . . .
more
|
|
|
|
